Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia

HyeJin Shi,1 Jin Seo Lee,2 So Yeon Park,2 Yousang Ko,2 Joong Sik Eom1 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea; 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shi H, Lee JS, Park SY, Ko Y, Eom JS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-12-01
Series:Infection and Drug Resistance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/colistin-plus-carbapenem-versus-colistin-monotherapy-in-the-treatment--peer-reviewed-article-IDR
_version_ 1818287444208910336
author Shi H
Lee JS
Park SY
Ko Y
Eom JS
author_facet Shi H
Lee JS
Park SY
Ko Y
Eom JS
author_sort Shi H
collection DOAJ
description HyeJin Shi,1 Jin Seo Lee,2 So Yeon Park,2 Yousang Ko,2 Joong Sik Eom1 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea; 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Jin Seo LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, 150 Sungan-Ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul 06351, South KoreaTel +82-2-2224-2895Fax +82-2-488-0119Email rem324@naver.comPurpose: Colistin alone may not be sufficient for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB); thus, efforts are needed to increase treatment success rates. We compared the effects of colistin plus carbapenem therapy versus colistin monotherapy in treating pneumonia caused by CRAB and attempted to identify specific populations or factors that could benefit from combination therapy.Methods: We retrospectively collected data on cases of CRAB pneumonia. The patients were divided into colistin plus carbapenem therapy and colistin monotherapy groups. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, clinical improvement at days 2 and 14, and microbiological improvement at day 14.Results: Of 160 cases meeting criteria for CRAB pneumonia, 83 (52%) and 77 (48.0%) were treated with carbapenem combination therapy or colistin monotherapy, respectively. Among these patients, 50 (63.3%) in the combination group and 27 (39.7%) in the monotherapy group had Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores >24 points (p=0.010). Overall, there was no significant difference in 14-day mortality between the combination and monotherapy groups (24.1% vs 20.8%, p=0.616). Clinical improvement and sputum-negative conversion also showed no significant difference. After adjusting for disease severity according to APACHE II score, the 14-day mortality was significantly lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group among patients with APACHE II scores of 25–29 points (9.1% vs 53.8%, P=0.020).Conclusion: Despite more severe conditions, compared with colistin monotherapy, colistin plus carbapenem combination therapy showed equivalent primary mortality outcome in treating CRAB pneumonia. Combination therapy was more effective in patients with APACHE II score ranging from 25 to 29 points.Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, CRAB, pneumonia, colistin, combination therapy, risk factor
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:40:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b929d66669440b2a63a6c944e4d2445
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6973
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:40:35Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Infection and Drug Resistance
spelling doaj.art-1b929d66669440b2a63a6c944e4d24452022-12-22T00:03:46ZengDove Medical PressInfection and Drug Resistance1178-69732019-12-01Volume 123925393450667Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii PneumoniaShi HLee JSPark SYKo YEom JSHyeJin Shi,1 Jin Seo Lee,2 So Yeon Park,2 Yousang Ko,2 Joong Sik Eom1 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea; 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Jin Seo LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, 150 Sungan-Ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul 06351, South KoreaTel +82-2-2224-2895Fax +82-2-488-0119Email rem324@naver.comPurpose: Colistin alone may not be sufficient for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB); thus, efforts are needed to increase treatment success rates. We compared the effects of colistin plus carbapenem therapy versus colistin monotherapy in treating pneumonia caused by CRAB and attempted to identify specific populations or factors that could benefit from combination therapy.Methods: We retrospectively collected data on cases of CRAB pneumonia. The patients were divided into colistin plus carbapenem therapy and colistin monotherapy groups. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, clinical improvement at days 2 and 14, and microbiological improvement at day 14.Results: Of 160 cases meeting criteria for CRAB pneumonia, 83 (52%) and 77 (48.0%) were treated with carbapenem combination therapy or colistin monotherapy, respectively. Among these patients, 50 (63.3%) in the combination group and 27 (39.7%) in the monotherapy group had Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores >24 points (p=0.010). Overall, there was no significant difference in 14-day mortality between the combination and monotherapy groups (24.1% vs 20.8%, p=0.616). Clinical improvement and sputum-negative conversion also showed no significant difference. After adjusting for disease severity according to APACHE II score, the 14-day mortality was significantly lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group among patients with APACHE II scores of 25–29 points (9.1% vs 53.8%, P=0.020).Conclusion: Despite more severe conditions, compared with colistin monotherapy, colistin plus carbapenem combination therapy showed equivalent primary mortality outcome in treating CRAB pneumonia. Combination therapy was more effective in patients with APACHE II score ranging from 25 to 29 points.Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, CRAB, pneumonia, colistin, combination therapy, risk factorhttps://www.dovepress.com/colistin-plus-carbapenem-versus-colistin-monotherapy-in-the-treatment--peer-reviewed-article-IDRcarbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii (crab)pneumoniacolistincombination therapyrisk factor
spellingShingle Shi H
Lee JS
Park SY
Ko Y
Eom JS
Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
Infection and Drug Resistance
carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii (crab)
pneumonia
colistin
combination therapy
risk factor
title Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
title_full Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
title_fullStr Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
title_short Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
title_sort colistin plus carbapenem versus colistin monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem resistant acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia
topic carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii (crab)
pneumonia
colistin
combination therapy
risk factor
url https://www.dovepress.com/colistin-plus-carbapenem-versus-colistin-monotherapy-in-the-treatment--peer-reviewed-article-IDR
work_keys_str_mv AT shih colistinpluscarbapenemversuscolistinmonotherapyinthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniipneumonia
AT leejs colistinpluscarbapenemversuscolistinmonotherapyinthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniipneumonia
AT parksy colistinpluscarbapenemversuscolistinmonotherapyinthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniipneumonia
AT koy colistinpluscarbapenemversuscolistinmonotherapyinthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniipneumonia
AT eomjs colistinpluscarbapenemversuscolistinmonotherapyinthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniipneumonia