Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama

Abstract Surveys assessing attitudes and values about the environment can help predict human behavior toward wildlife and develop effective conservation goals alongside local communities. Coastal Alabama, in the southeastern United States, is a hotspot for biodiversity and endemism and needs protect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Weber Hertel, Jana Stupavsky, Kristine Alford, Hannah R. Hicks, Andrew Heaton, Nathan Katlein, Brandon T. Hastings, Adam Stern, Stephanie Jett, Andrew Y. Wang, Bin Wang, Scott Glaberman, Ylenia Chiari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-08-01
Series:Conservation Science and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12957
_version_ 1797754564826365952
author Sarah Weber Hertel
Jana Stupavsky
Kristine Alford
Hannah R. Hicks
Andrew Heaton
Nathan Katlein
Brandon T. Hastings
Adam Stern
Stephanie Jett
Andrew Y. Wang
Bin Wang
Scott Glaberman
Ylenia Chiari
author_facet Sarah Weber Hertel
Jana Stupavsky
Kristine Alford
Hannah R. Hicks
Andrew Heaton
Nathan Katlein
Brandon T. Hastings
Adam Stern
Stephanie Jett
Andrew Y. Wang
Bin Wang
Scott Glaberman
Ylenia Chiari
author_sort Sarah Weber Hertel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Surveys assessing attitudes and values about the environment can help predict human behavior toward wildlife and develop effective conservation goals alongside local communities. Coastal Alabama, in the southeastern United States, is a hotspot for biodiversity and endemism and needs protection. Land and wildlife management practices in Alabama have moved from indigenous‐led, which is more in harmony with the environment, to larger‐scale exploitative uses for agriculture and plantations. We therefore predicted that a large proportion of the population has a dominant view of the environment in which land and wildlife are primarily for human benefit. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed over 1300 residents in Mobile and Baldwin counties—the two southernmost counties in Alabama—to assess attitudes toward local vertebrate wildlife, knowledge of the region's biodiversity, and whether individuals value protected areas where they live and/or work. As hunting is generally considered a dominant behavior, we used self‐identified hunters versus non‐hunters to examine the relationship between humans and the environment. Overall, hunters would kill or kill to eat more often than non‐hunters, and would kill even when it is not for food. Furthermore, regardless of hunting status, most participants in our survey would kill a snake, indicating that targeted environmental education is needed for this group. Both hunters and non‐hunters, independently of demographic differences including education and income levels, were not familiar with the especially rich biodiversity of the area and would not be willing to invest money to protect it. Our results indicate that targeted education about the unique and rich biodiversity of southern Alabama compared to the rest of the United States is needed to support successful environmental management, conservation actions, and local participation.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:35:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b98630a0bdb4573a4207b787c30d61e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2578-4854
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:35:16Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Science and Practice
spelling doaj.art-1b98630a0bdb4573a4207b787c30d61e2023-08-04T11:36:29ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542023-08-0158n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12957Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal AlabamaSarah Weber Hertel0Jana Stupavsky1Kristine Alford2Hannah R. Hicks3Andrew Heaton4Nathan Katlein5Brandon T. Hastings6Adam Stern7Stephanie Jett8Andrew Y. Wang9Bin Wang10Scott Glaberman11Ylenia Chiari12Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USASouth Alabama Center for Business Analytics, Real Estate, and Economic Development University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USADepartment of Biology University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USADepartment of Biology University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USAGrand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Moss Point Mississippi USADepartment of Biology George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USADepartment of Biology George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USAGenetic Diversity Bank Milledgeville Georgia USADepartment of Psychological Science Georgia College & State University Milledgeville Georgia USAOakton High School Vienna Virginia USADepartment of Mathematics and Statistics University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USADepartment of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USADepartment of Biology George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USAAbstract Surveys assessing attitudes and values about the environment can help predict human behavior toward wildlife and develop effective conservation goals alongside local communities. Coastal Alabama, in the southeastern United States, is a hotspot for biodiversity and endemism and needs protection. Land and wildlife management practices in Alabama have moved from indigenous‐led, which is more in harmony with the environment, to larger‐scale exploitative uses for agriculture and plantations. We therefore predicted that a large proportion of the population has a dominant view of the environment in which land and wildlife are primarily for human benefit. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed over 1300 residents in Mobile and Baldwin counties—the two southernmost counties in Alabama—to assess attitudes toward local vertebrate wildlife, knowledge of the region's biodiversity, and whether individuals value protected areas where they live and/or work. As hunting is generally considered a dominant behavior, we used self‐identified hunters versus non‐hunters to examine the relationship between humans and the environment. Overall, hunters would kill or kill to eat more often than non‐hunters, and would kill even when it is not for food. Furthermore, regardless of hunting status, most participants in our survey would kill a snake, indicating that targeted environmental education is needed for this group. Both hunters and non‐hunters, independently of demographic differences including education and income levels, were not familiar with the especially rich biodiversity of the area and would not be willing to invest money to protect it. Our results indicate that targeted education about the unique and rich biodiversity of southern Alabama compared to the rest of the United States is needed to support successful environmental management, conservation actions, and local participation.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12957behaviorconservationenvironmental educationhuman dimensionshuntingsnakes
spellingShingle Sarah Weber Hertel
Jana Stupavsky
Kristine Alford
Hannah R. Hicks
Andrew Heaton
Nathan Katlein
Brandon T. Hastings
Adam Stern
Stephanie Jett
Andrew Y. Wang
Bin Wang
Scott Glaberman
Ylenia Chiari
Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
Conservation Science and Practice
behavior
conservation
environmental education
human dimensions
hunting
snakes
title Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
title_full Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
title_fullStr Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
title_full_unstemmed Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
title_short Dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal Alabama
title_sort dominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal alabama
topic behavior
conservation
environmental education
human dimensions
hunting
snakes
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12957
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahweberhertel dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT janastupavsky dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT kristinealford dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT hannahrhicks dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT andrewheaton dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT nathankatlein dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT brandonthastings dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT adamstern dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT stephaniejett dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT andrewywang dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT binwang dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT scottglaberman dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama
AT yleniachiari dominantattitudesandvaluestowardwildlifeandtheenvironmentincoastalalabama