Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse

The stringency in effluent discharge and reuse standards has made it extremely expensive to discharge the effluents safely or reuse them. Therefore, existing wastewater treatment plants should be evaluated and improved or augmented. With this aim, five existing common effluent treatment plants (CETP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muntjeer Ali, Abdulaziz Ibrahim Almohana, Abdulrhman Fahmi Alali, Mohab Amin Kamal, Abbas Khursheed, Anwar Khursheed, A. A. Kazmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.741343/full
_version_ 1818460441452478464
author Muntjeer Ali
Abdulaziz Ibrahim Almohana
Abdulrhman Fahmi Alali
Mohab Amin Kamal
Abbas Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
A. A. Kazmi
author_facet Muntjeer Ali
Abdulaziz Ibrahim Almohana
Abdulrhman Fahmi Alali
Mohab Amin Kamal
Abbas Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
A. A. Kazmi
author_sort Muntjeer Ali
collection DOAJ
description The stringency in effluent discharge and reuse standards has made it extremely expensive to discharge the effluents safely or reuse them. Therefore, existing wastewater treatment plants should be evaluated and improved or augmented. With this aim, five existing common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) in North India were evaluated, including: the State infrastructure Development Corporation Uttrakhand Limited (SIDCUL) Haridwar, which processes 4.5 Million Liters per day (MLD); the Industrial Model Township (IMT) Manesar Gurgaon, 55 MLD (comprising two streams of 25 and 30 MLD each); the Lawrence Road Industrial Area (LRIA), Delhi, 12MLD (12MLD LRIA); Mayapuri Industrial Area (MIA), Delhi, 12MLD; and the Integrated Industrial Estate (IIE) SIDCUL Pantnagar, 4.0 MLD. These plants were designed to produce treated effluent for non-potable reuse. Results showed that the integrated efficiency (IEa) of all CETPs was 10–20% larger than standard integrated efficiency (IEs), indicating the suitability of the technology, except for 12MLD at MIA CETP where the IEa was 20% lower than IEs, due to the absence of any biological unit in the process. Combined post-treatment of secondary effluent by coagulation, Ultrafiltration (UF), followed by ozonation for CETP SIDCUL Haridwar, was also conducted for its non-potable water reuse. This process was able to reduce Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) by 77%, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) by 76%, turbidity by 96%, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by 100%. All these parameters confirmed the effluent standards for non-potable reuse. The color was reduced to 4.0 from 42.0 Pt-Co units by the exposure ozone concentration of 8.3 mg/L for up to 4.0 min on the treated water from SIDCUL CETP, which reduced the color by 90% and complied with reuse standards. Hence Combined post treatment by coagulation, UF followed Ozonation of secondary treated effluent could be a better option for the potable reuse of treated water in various domestic and industrial applications.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:30:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b9a2c51e3ed40b599ccc5e00392ff3d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:30:18Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-1b9a2c51e3ed40b599ccc5e00392ff3d2022-12-21T22:43:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2021-12-01910.3389/fenvs.2021.741343741343Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable ReuseMuntjeer Ali0Abdulaziz Ibrahim Almohana1Abdulrhman Fahmi Alali2Mohab Amin Kamal3Abbas Khursheed4Anwar Khursheed5Anwar Khursheed6A. A. Kazmi7Environmental Engineering Group, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) Uttarakhand (India), Roorkee, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Z.H. College of Engineering and Technology, AMU, Aligarh, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Z.H. College of Engineering and Technology, AMU, Aligarh, IndiaEnvironmental Engineering Group, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) Uttarakhand (India), Roorkee, IndiaThe stringency in effluent discharge and reuse standards has made it extremely expensive to discharge the effluents safely or reuse them. Therefore, existing wastewater treatment plants should be evaluated and improved or augmented. With this aim, five existing common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) in North India were evaluated, including: the State infrastructure Development Corporation Uttrakhand Limited (SIDCUL) Haridwar, which processes 4.5 Million Liters per day (MLD); the Industrial Model Township (IMT) Manesar Gurgaon, 55 MLD (comprising two streams of 25 and 30 MLD each); the Lawrence Road Industrial Area (LRIA), Delhi, 12MLD (12MLD LRIA); Mayapuri Industrial Area (MIA), Delhi, 12MLD; and the Integrated Industrial Estate (IIE) SIDCUL Pantnagar, 4.0 MLD. These plants were designed to produce treated effluent for non-potable reuse. Results showed that the integrated efficiency (IEa) of all CETPs was 10–20% larger than standard integrated efficiency (IEs), indicating the suitability of the technology, except for 12MLD at MIA CETP where the IEa was 20% lower than IEs, due to the absence of any biological unit in the process. Combined post-treatment of secondary effluent by coagulation, Ultrafiltration (UF), followed by ozonation for CETP SIDCUL Haridwar, was also conducted for its non-potable water reuse. This process was able to reduce Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) by 77%, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) by 76%, turbidity by 96%, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by 100%. All these parameters confirmed the effluent standards for non-potable reuse. The color was reduced to 4.0 from 42.0 Pt-Co units by the exposure ozone concentration of 8.3 mg/L for up to 4.0 min on the treated water from SIDCUL CETP, which reduced the color by 90% and complied with reuse standards. Hence Combined post treatment by coagulation, UF followed Ozonation of secondary treated effluent could be a better option for the potable reuse of treated water in various domestic and industrial applications.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.741343/fullcommon effluent treatment plantperformance evaluationcoagulationultrafiltrationozonationnon-potable reuse
spellingShingle Muntjeer Ali
Abdulaziz Ibrahim Almohana
Abdulrhman Fahmi Alali
Mohab Amin Kamal
Abbas Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
Anwar Khursheed
A. A. Kazmi
Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
Frontiers in Environmental Science
common effluent treatment plant
performance evaluation
coagulation
ultrafiltration
ozonation
non-potable reuse
title Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
title_full Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
title_fullStr Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
title_full_unstemmed Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
title_short Common Effluent Treatment Plants Monitoring and Process Augmentation Options to Conform Non-potable Reuse
title_sort common effluent treatment plants monitoring and process augmentation options to conform non potable reuse
topic common effluent treatment plant
performance evaluation
coagulation
ultrafiltration
ozonation
non-potable reuse
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.741343/full
work_keys_str_mv AT muntjeerali commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT abdulazizibrahimalmohana commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT abdulrhmanfahmialali commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT mohabaminkamal commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT abbaskhursheed commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT anwarkhursheed commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT anwarkhursheed commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse
AT aakazmi commoneffluenttreatmentplantsmonitoringandprocessaugmentationoptionstoconformnonpotablereuse