Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment

The use of green roofs is demonstrated to improve the energy performance of buildings, increase biodiversity, reduce environmental impacts of urban areas, and mitigate climate change phenomena. Their use on a large scale is desirable in the coming years. Still, the choice of the most suitable green...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muscas Desirée, Frota De Albuquerque Landi Fabiana, Fabiani Claudia, Grohmann David, Rocchi Lucia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2022-01-01
Series:Environmental and Climate Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0072
_version_ 1811171353287458816
author Muscas Desirée
Frota De Albuquerque Landi Fabiana
Fabiani Claudia
Grohmann David
Rocchi Lucia
author_facet Muscas Desirée
Frota De Albuquerque Landi Fabiana
Fabiani Claudia
Grohmann David
Rocchi Lucia
author_sort Muscas Desirée
collection DOAJ
description The use of green roofs is demonstrated to improve the energy performance of buildings, increase biodiversity, reduce environmental impacts of urban areas, and mitigate climate change phenomena. Their use on a large scale is desirable in the coming years. Still, the choice of the most suitable green roof design solution should also consider the impacts of their production. Within this study, the Life Cycle Assessment methodology was used to evaluate the environmental impact of a particular typology of soil-less green roofs ideated by an Italian company. In this lightweight green roof, the growing medium is replaced by recycled felt layers, filtration is guaranteed by geotextile, and a closed-loop sub-irrigation system fertilises the pre-growth lawn placed on the top. The extremely low weight of this system suggests an optimal use in building retrofitting scenarios, but its environmental implication was not known. The environmental impact of this product has been assessed with an attributional cradle-to-gate approach through four different methodologies (ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint H V1.1, Ecological footprint V1.01, and IPCC 2013 GWP 100y V1.0) using the ecoinvent v3, Agri-footprint 1.0, and ELCD database on the SimaPro 8.4.4.0 software. The IPCC method has shown a Global Warming Potential of 7.66 kg of CO2 eq. for 1 m2 of Pratotetto® green roof; however, the reuse of waste materials from the textile industry must be considered.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:12:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b9b0ca9da8143d9924e1378fe9ae679
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2255-8837
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:12:34Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Environmental and Climate Technologies
spelling doaj.art-1b9b0ca9da8143d9924e1378fe9ae6792023-02-05T19:46:42ZengSciendoEnvironmental and Climate Technologies2255-88372022-01-0126195596710.2478/rtuect-2022-0072Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle AssessmentMuscas Desirée0Frota De Albuquerque Landi Fabiana1Fabiani Claudia2Grohmann David3Rocchi Lucia4International Doctoral Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93 – 06125Perugia, ItalyCIRIAF Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67 – 06125Perugia, ItalyCIRIAF Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67 – 06125Perugia, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74 – 06121Perugia, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74 – 06121Perugia, ItalyThe use of green roofs is demonstrated to improve the energy performance of buildings, increase biodiversity, reduce environmental impacts of urban areas, and mitigate climate change phenomena. Their use on a large scale is desirable in the coming years. Still, the choice of the most suitable green roof design solution should also consider the impacts of their production. Within this study, the Life Cycle Assessment methodology was used to evaluate the environmental impact of a particular typology of soil-less green roofs ideated by an Italian company. In this lightweight green roof, the growing medium is replaced by recycled felt layers, filtration is guaranteed by geotextile, and a closed-loop sub-irrigation system fertilises the pre-growth lawn placed on the top. The extremely low weight of this system suggests an optimal use in building retrofitting scenarios, but its environmental implication was not known. The environmental impact of this product has been assessed with an attributional cradle-to-gate approach through four different methodologies (ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint H V1.1, Ecological footprint V1.01, and IPCC 2013 GWP 100y V1.0) using the ecoinvent v3, Agri-footprint 1.0, and ELCD database on the SimaPro 8.4.4.0 software. The IPCC method has shown a Global Warming Potential of 7.66 kg of CO2 eq. for 1 m2 of Pratotetto® green roof; however, the reuse of waste materials from the textile industry must be considered.https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0072climate change mitigationecological footprintenvironmental impact analysisglobal warming potential (gwp)nature-based solutionsrecipesimapro
spellingShingle Muscas Desirée
Frota De Albuquerque Landi Fabiana
Fabiani Claudia
Grohmann David
Rocchi Lucia
Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental and Climate Technologies
climate change mitigation
ecological footprint
environmental impact analysis
global warming potential (gwp)
nature-based solutions
recipe
simapro
title Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
title_full Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
title_fullStr Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Zoysia Soil-Less Green Roof’s Performance: A Life Cycle Assessment
title_sort zoysia soil less green roof s performance a life cycle assessment
topic climate change mitigation
ecological footprint
environmental impact analysis
global warming potential (gwp)
nature-based solutions
recipe
simapro
url https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0072
work_keys_str_mv AT muscasdesiree zoysiasoillessgreenroofsperformancealifecycleassessment
AT frotadealbuquerquelandifabiana zoysiasoillessgreenroofsperformancealifecycleassessment
AT fabianiclaudia zoysiasoillessgreenroofsperformancealifecycleassessment
AT grohmanndavid zoysiasoillessgreenroofsperformancealifecycleassessment
AT rocchilucia zoysiasoillessgreenroofsperformancealifecycleassessment