The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article

Background: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven non-inferior or superior against surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients at high, intermediate or low surgical risk. However, transfemoral access is not always feasible in patients with severely atherosc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andries Herremans, Dylan Thomas Stevesyns, Hicham El Jattari, Michaël Rosseel, Liesbeth Rosseel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2023-05-01
Series:Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/24/5/10.31083/j.rcm2405150
_version_ 1827936295117127680
author Andries Herremans
Dylan Thomas Stevesyns
Hicham El Jattari
Michaël Rosseel
Liesbeth Rosseel
author_facet Andries Herremans
Dylan Thomas Stevesyns
Hicham El Jattari
Michaël Rosseel
Liesbeth Rosseel
author_sort Andries Herremans
collection DOAJ
description Background: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven non-inferior or superior against surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients at high, intermediate or low surgical risk. However, transfemoral access is not always feasible in patients with severely atherosclerotic or tortuous iliofemoral arteries. For these cases, alternative access techniques have been developed, such as transcarotid, transcaval, direct aortic or transaxillary access. In recent years, growing preference towards the transaxillary access has emerged. To provide a summary of data available on transaxillary TAVI and compare this approach to other alternative access techniques. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed by two independent reviewers. Studies reporting the outcome of at least 10 patients who underwent transaxillary TAVI, either in case series or in comparative studies, were included in this review. Articles not reporting outcomes according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 1–3 definitions were excluded. Results: In total 193 records were found of which 18 were withheld for inclusion in this review. This review reports on the combined data of the 1519 patients who underwent transaxillary TAVI. Procedural success was achieved in 1203 (92.2%) of 1305 cases. Life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding occurred respectively in 4.5% (n = 50 in 1112 cases), 12.9% (n = 143 in 1112 cases) and 8.8% (n = 86 in 978 cases). Major and minor vascular complications were reported in respectively 6.6% (n = 83 in 1256 cases) and 10.0% (n = 105 in 1048 cases) of patients. 30-day mortality was 5.2% (n = 76 out of 1457 cases). At one year follow-up, the mortality rate was 1% (n = 184 out of 1082 cases). Similar 30-day and 1-year mortality is observed in studies that compare with transaxillary, transfemoral or other alternative access techniques (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A wide application of transaxillary access as an alternative approach for TAVI has emerged. This technique has an excellent procedural success rate up to 92.0%, with low procedural complication rates. Clinical outcome of transaxillary TAVI is comparable to the other alternative TAVI approaches. However, these conclusions are solely based on observational data.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:08:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bac898de146424c86fad65f605303f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1530-6550
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:08:03Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1bac898de146424c86fad65f605303f92023-06-01T01:35:07ZengIMR PressReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine1530-65502023-05-0124515010.31083/j.rcm2405150S1530-6550(23)00892-XThe Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review ArticleAndries Herremans0Dylan Thomas Stevesyns1Hicham El Jattari2Michaël Rosseel3Liesbeth Rosseel4Department of Cardiology, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, BelgiumBackground: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven non-inferior or superior against surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients at high, intermediate or low surgical risk. However, transfemoral access is not always feasible in patients with severely atherosclerotic or tortuous iliofemoral arteries. For these cases, alternative access techniques have been developed, such as transcarotid, transcaval, direct aortic or transaxillary access. In recent years, growing preference towards the transaxillary access has emerged. To provide a summary of data available on transaxillary TAVI and compare this approach to other alternative access techniques. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed by two independent reviewers. Studies reporting the outcome of at least 10 patients who underwent transaxillary TAVI, either in case series or in comparative studies, were included in this review. Articles not reporting outcomes according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 1–3 definitions were excluded. Results: In total 193 records were found of which 18 were withheld for inclusion in this review. This review reports on the combined data of the 1519 patients who underwent transaxillary TAVI. Procedural success was achieved in 1203 (92.2%) of 1305 cases. Life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding occurred respectively in 4.5% (n = 50 in 1112 cases), 12.9% (n = 143 in 1112 cases) and 8.8% (n = 86 in 978 cases). Major and minor vascular complications were reported in respectively 6.6% (n = 83 in 1256 cases) and 10.0% (n = 105 in 1048 cases) of patients. 30-day mortality was 5.2% (n = 76 out of 1457 cases). At one year follow-up, the mortality rate was 1% (n = 184 out of 1082 cases). Similar 30-day and 1-year mortality is observed in studies that compare with transaxillary, transfemoral or other alternative access techniques (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A wide application of transaxillary access as an alternative approach for TAVI has emerged. This technique has an excellent procedural success rate up to 92.0%, with low procedural complication rates. Clinical outcome of transaxillary TAVI is comparable to the other alternative TAVI approaches. However, these conclusions are solely based on observational data.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/24/5/10.31083/j.rcm2405150transcatheter aortic valve implantationtavitransaxillaryaortic valve stenosisinterventional cardiology
spellingShingle Andries Herremans
Dylan Thomas Stevesyns
Hicham El Jattari
Michaël Rosseel
Liesbeth Rosseel
The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
tavi
transaxillary
aortic valve stenosis
interventional cardiology
title The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
title_full The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
title_fullStr The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
title_full_unstemmed The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
title_short The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article
title_sort place of transaxillary access in transcatheter aortic valve implantation tavi compared to alternative routes a systematic review article
topic transcatheter aortic valve implantation
tavi
transaxillary
aortic valve stenosis
interventional cardiology
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/24/5/10.31083/j.rcm2405150
work_keys_str_mv AT andriesherremans theplaceoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT dylanthomasstevesyns theplaceoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT hichameljattari theplaceoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT michaelrosseel theplaceoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT liesbethrosseel theplaceoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT andriesherremans placeoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT dylanthomasstevesyns placeoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT hichameljattari placeoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT michaelrosseel placeoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle
AT liesbethrosseel placeoftransaxillaryaccessintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationtavicomparedtoalternativeroutesasystematicreviewarticle