Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law

In this study, rate and state Coulomb stress transfer model is adopted to forecast the seismicity rate of earthquakes (MW ≥ 5) in the north-west Himalaya region within the testing period 2011–2013. Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF), considered to be the most critical parameter in the model, exhibit stre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prasanta Chingtham, Sanjay K. Prajapati, Vineet K. Gahalaut, Sumer Chopra, Pareshnath Singha Roy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-12-01
Series:Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1369168
_version_ 1811330437869469696
author Prasanta Chingtham
Sanjay K. Prajapati
Vineet K. Gahalaut
Sumer Chopra
Pareshnath Singha Roy
author_facet Prasanta Chingtham
Sanjay K. Prajapati
Vineet K. Gahalaut
Sumer Chopra
Pareshnath Singha Roy
author_sort Prasanta Chingtham
collection DOAJ
description In this study, rate and state Coulomb stress transfer model is adopted to forecast the seismicity rate of earthquakes (MW ≥ 5) in the north-west Himalaya region within the testing period 2011–2013. Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF), considered to be the most critical parameter in the model, exhibit stress increase in the whole study region, excluding the Chaman fault of the Kirthar range where significant stress shadow has been observed. The estimated background seismicity rate varies in the range 0.0–0.7 in the region, which is preoccupied by low aftershock duration of <50 years. Furthermore, a low b-value that varies between 0.54 and 0.83 is observed in Kirthar ranges, Karakoram fault and Pamir-Hindukush region. However, areas like Hazara syntaxis of the northern Pakistan and northern Pamir of the Eurasian plate exhibit higher b-values in the range 1.23–1.74. Considering constant constitutive properties of the faults (i.e. Aσ = 0.05 MPa), our forecast model for variable ΔCFF and heterogeneous b-value successfully captures the observed seismicity rate of earthquakes. Results have been verified using statistical S-test. However, the model fails to capture the observed seismicity rate during the period when reconstructed for average b-value to be 0.86 and no change in ΔCFF (ΔCFF = 0).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:02:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bacd3daa3774ad28873f66392d1c56a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1947-5705
1947-5713
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:02:44Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
spelling doaj.art-1bacd3daa3774ad28873f66392d1c56a2022-12-22T02:40:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGeomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk1947-57051947-57132017-12-01821643166110.1080/19475705.2017.13691681369168Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction lawPrasanta Chingtham0Sanjay K. Prajapati1Vineet K. Gahalaut2Sumer Chopra3Pareshnath Singha Roy4National Center for SeismologyNational Center for SeismologyNational Center for SeismologyInstitute of Seismological ResearchIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)In this study, rate and state Coulomb stress transfer model is adopted to forecast the seismicity rate of earthquakes (MW ≥ 5) in the north-west Himalaya region within the testing period 2011–2013. Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF), considered to be the most critical parameter in the model, exhibit stress increase in the whole study region, excluding the Chaman fault of the Kirthar range where significant stress shadow has been observed. The estimated background seismicity rate varies in the range 0.0–0.7 in the region, which is preoccupied by low aftershock duration of <50 years. Furthermore, a low b-value that varies between 0.54 and 0.83 is observed in Kirthar ranges, Karakoram fault and Pamir-Hindukush region. However, areas like Hazara syntaxis of the northern Pakistan and northern Pamir of the Eurasian plate exhibit higher b-values in the range 1.23–1.74. Considering constant constitutive properties of the faults (i.e. Aσ = 0.05 MPa), our forecast model for variable ΔCFF and heterogeneous b-value successfully captures the observed seismicity rate of earthquakes. Results have been verified using statistical S-test. However, the model fails to capture the observed seismicity rate during the period when reconstructed for average b-value to be 0.86 and no change in ΔCFF (ΔCFF = 0).http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1369168himalayaseismicitycoulomb stressb-valueforecast
spellingShingle Prasanta Chingtham
Sanjay K. Prajapati
Vineet K. Gahalaut
Sumer Chopra
Pareshnath Singha Roy
Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
himalaya
seismicity
coulomb stress
b-value
forecast
title Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
title_full Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
title_fullStr Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
title_full_unstemmed Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
title_short Forecasting seismicity rate in the north-west Himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
title_sort forecasting seismicity rate in the north west himalaya using rate and state dependent friction law
topic himalaya
seismicity
coulomb stress
b-value
forecast
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1369168
work_keys_str_mv AT prasantachingtham forecastingseismicityrateinthenorthwesthimalayausingrateandstatedependentfrictionlaw
AT sanjaykprajapati forecastingseismicityrateinthenorthwesthimalayausingrateandstatedependentfrictionlaw
AT vineetkgahalaut forecastingseismicityrateinthenorthwesthimalayausingrateandstatedependentfrictionlaw
AT sumerchopra forecastingseismicityrateinthenorthwesthimalayausingrateandstatedependentfrictionlaw
AT pareshnathsingharoy forecastingseismicityrateinthenorthwesthimalayausingrateandstatedependentfrictionlaw