Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract Background Female genital cutting (FGC) may cause a series of health problems that require specialized healthcare. General practitioners (GPs) are gatekeepers to specialized healthcare services in Norway. To refer girls and women subjected to FGC to appropriate services, GPs need to assess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mai Mahgoub Ziyada, R. Elise B Johansen, Mona Berthelsen, Inger-Lise Lien, Bothild Bendiksen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09085-4
_version_ 1811175923927482368
author Mai Mahgoub Ziyada
R. Elise B Johansen
Mona Berthelsen
Inger-Lise Lien
Bothild Bendiksen
author_facet Mai Mahgoub Ziyada
R. Elise B Johansen
Mona Berthelsen
Inger-Lise Lien
Bothild Bendiksen
author_sort Mai Mahgoub Ziyada
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Female genital cutting (FGC) may cause a series of health problems that require specialized healthcare. General practitioners (GPs) are gatekeepers to specialized healthcare services in Norway. To refer girls and women subjected to FGC to appropriate services, GPs need to assess whether the health problems reported by these patients are related to FGC. However, we do not know to what degree GPs assess FGC as a potential cause of the patients' health problems. We also know little about the GPs' patterns of training and knowledge of FGC and their effect on the GPs' assessment of FGC as a potential cause of health problems. Method We employed a cross-sectional online survey among GPs in Norway to examine: 1) patterns of received training on FGC, self-assessed knowledge, and experiences with patients with FGC-related problems and 2) the association between these three factors and the GPs' assessment of FGC as a potential cause of patients' health problems. A total of 222 GPs completed the survey. Data were analysed using binary logistic regression, where we also adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Two-third of the participants had received training on FGC, but only over half received training on FGC-related health problems. Over 75% of the participants stated a need for more knowledge of FGC typology and Norwegian legislation. While the majority of the participants assessed their knowledge of FGC medical codes as inadequate, this was not the case for knowledge of the cultural aspects of FGC. Female GPs were more likely to have experience with patients with FGC-related health problems than male GPs. Among GPs with experience, 46% linked health problems to FGC in patients unaware of the connection between FGC and such health problems. GPs were more likely to assess FGC as a potential cause of health problems when they had experience with patients having FGC-related problems and when they assessed their knowledge of FGC typology and FGC-related medical codes as adequate. Conclusion To improve their assessment of FGC as a potential cause of patients' health problems, GPs should receive comprehensive training on FGC, with particular emphasis on typology, health problems, and medical codes.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:43:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bb28068fdaa4d07a625a4c2cfd2e368
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:43:51Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-1bb28068fdaa4d07a625a4c2cfd2e3682023-01-29T12:07:49ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632023-01-0123111310.1186/s12913-023-09085-4Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional surveyMai Mahgoub Ziyada0R. Elise B Johansen1Mona Berthelsen2Inger-Lise Lien3Bothild Bendiksen4Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesAbstract Background Female genital cutting (FGC) may cause a series of health problems that require specialized healthcare. General practitioners (GPs) are gatekeepers to specialized healthcare services in Norway. To refer girls and women subjected to FGC to appropriate services, GPs need to assess whether the health problems reported by these patients are related to FGC. However, we do not know to what degree GPs assess FGC as a potential cause of the patients' health problems. We also know little about the GPs' patterns of training and knowledge of FGC and their effect on the GPs' assessment of FGC as a potential cause of health problems. Method We employed a cross-sectional online survey among GPs in Norway to examine: 1) patterns of received training on FGC, self-assessed knowledge, and experiences with patients with FGC-related problems and 2) the association between these three factors and the GPs' assessment of FGC as a potential cause of patients' health problems. A total of 222 GPs completed the survey. Data were analysed using binary logistic regression, where we also adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Two-third of the participants had received training on FGC, but only over half received training on FGC-related health problems. Over 75% of the participants stated a need for more knowledge of FGC typology and Norwegian legislation. While the majority of the participants assessed their knowledge of FGC medical codes as inadequate, this was not the case for knowledge of the cultural aspects of FGC. Female GPs were more likely to have experience with patients with FGC-related health problems than male GPs. Among GPs with experience, 46% linked health problems to FGC in patients unaware of the connection between FGC and such health problems. GPs were more likely to assess FGC as a potential cause of health problems when they had experience with patients having FGC-related problems and when they assessed their knowledge of FGC typology and FGC-related medical codes as adequate. Conclusion To improve their assessment of FGC as a potential cause of patients' health problems, GPs should receive comprehensive training on FGC, with particular emphasis on typology, health problems, and medical codes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09085-4Female Genital Mutilation/cuttingHealthcareGeneral practitionersManagementTrainingKnowledge
spellingShingle Mai Mahgoub Ziyada
R. Elise B Johansen
Mona Berthelsen
Inger-Lise Lien
Bothild Bendiksen
Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
BMC Health Services Research
Female Genital Mutilation/cutting
Healthcare
General practitioners
Management
Training
Knowledge
title Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort factors associated with general practitioners routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting a cross sectional survey
topic Female Genital Mutilation/cutting
Healthcare
General practitioners
Management
Training
Knowledge
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09085-4
work_keys_str_mv AT maimahgoubziyada factorsassociatedwithgeneralpractitionersroutinesandcomfortabilitywithassessingfemalegenitalcuttingacrosssectionalsurvey
AT relisebjohansen factorsassociatedwithgeneralpractitionersroutinesandcomfortabilitywithassessingfemalegenitalcuttingacrosssectionalsurvey
AT monaberthelsen factorsassociatedwithgeneralpractitionersroutinesandcomfortabilitywithassessingfemalegenitalcuttingacrosssectionalsurvey
AT ingerliselien factorsassociatedwithgeneralpractitionersroutinesandcomfortabilitywithassessingfemalegenitalcuttingacrosssectionalsurvey
AT bothildbendiksen factorsassociatedwithgeneralpractitionersroutinesandcomfortabilitywithassessingfemalegenitalcuttingacrosssectionalsurvey