True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steels (SS) possess much more complex surfaces than their wrought counterparts which affects the corrosion behavior. Surface roughness, a typical metric for assessing corrosion of conventionally manufactured metals, is often...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seongkoo Cho, Steven F. Buchsbaum, Monika Biener, Justin Jones, Michael A. Melia, Jamie A. Stull, Hector R. Colon-Mercado, Jonathan Dwyer, S. Roger Qiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Materials & Design
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127523009759
_version_ 1797347797436989440
author Seongkoo Cho
Steven F. Buchsbaum
Monika Biener
Justin Jones
Michael A. Melia
Jamie A. Stull
Hector R. Colon-Mercado
Jonathan Dwyer
S. Roger Qiu
author_facet Seongkoo Cho
Steven F. Buchsbaum
Monika Biener
Justin Jones
Michael A. Melia
Jamie A. Stull
Hector R. Colon-Mercado
Jonathan Dwyer
S. Roger Qiu
author_sort Seongkoo Cho
collection DOAJ
description Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steels (SS) possess much more complex surfaces than their wrought counterparts which affects the corrosion behavior. Surface roughness, a typical metric for assessing corrosion of conventionally manufactured metals, is often ineffective as an independent parameter in characterizing corrosion of the AM metals for their higher surface roughness ranging from 5 to 50 µm. This study experimentally shows that the true active surface area (ATA) is a proper parameter for quick assessment of localized corrosion response of AM 316L SS. Through the potentiodynamic polarization testing on surrogates under full immersion in 0.6 M NaCl solution, the pitting corrosion susceptibility was evaluated. While no consistent correlation to surface roughness was displayed, the pitting breakdown potential (Ep) showed a clear statistical trend at 1/ATA0.5. In addition, normalization of the polarization resistance with the ATA reveals the corresponding surface roughness did not significantly affect the change in open-circuit corrosion phenomenon. This correlation fits well with a previously reported stochastic pitting model on metal surfaces. The results suggest that the importance of ATA as a predictor for predisposition to corrosion in AM 316L SS extends far beyond what has been established for wrought materials.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:54:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bb3b0f3f6154b12ad093f6e5d51eddc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0264-1275
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:54:04Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Materials & Design
spelling doaj.art-1bb3b0f3f6154b12ad093f6e5d51eddc2024-01-24T05:16:23ZengElsevierMaterials & Design0264-12752024-01-01237112559True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steelSeongkoo Cho0Steven F. Buchsbaum1Monika Biener2Justin Jones3Michael A. Melia4Jamie A. Stull5Hector R. Colon-Mercado6Jonathan Dwyer7S. Roger Qiu8Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550, United StatesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550, United StatesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550, United StatesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550, United StatesSandia National Laboratories, 1515 Eubank Blvd., SE, Albuquerque, NM 87123, United StatesLos Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545, United StatesSavannah River National Laboratory, 999-2W, Aiken, SC 29808, United StatesKansas City National Security Campus, 14520 Botts Rd, Kansas City, MO 64147, United StatesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550, United States; Corresponding author.Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steels (SS) possess much more complex surfaces than their wrought counterparts which affects the corrosion behavior. Surface roughness, a typical metric for assessing corrosion of conventionally manufactured metals, is often ineffective as an independent parameter in characterizing corrosion of the AM metals for their higher surface roughness ranging from 5 to 50 µm. This study experimentally shows that the true active surface area (ATA) is a proper parameter for quick assessment of localized corrosion response of AM 316L SS. Through the potentiodynamic polarization testing on surrogates under full immersion in 0.6 M NaCl solution, the pitting corrosion susceptibility was evaluated. While no consistent correlation to surface roughness was displayed, the pitting breakdown potential (Ep) showed a clear statistical trend at 1/ATA0.5. In addition, normalization of the polarization resistance with the ATA reveals the corresponding surface roughness did not significantly affect the change in open-circuit corrosion phenomenon. This correlation fits well with a previously reported stochastic pitting model on metal surfaces. The results suggest that the importance of ATA as a predictor for predisposition to corrosion in AM 316L SS extends far beyond what has been established for wrought materials.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127523009759True active surfaceAdditive manufacturing316L stainless steelSurface roughnessCorrosion
spellingShingle Seongkoo Cho
Steven F. Buchsbaum
Monika Biener
Justin Jones
Michael A. Melia
Jamie A. Stull
Hector R. Colon-Mercado
Jonathan Dwyer
S. Roger Qiu
True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
Materials & Design
True active surface
Additive manufacturing
316L stainless steel
Surface roughness
Corrosion
title True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
title_full True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
title_fullStr True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
title_full_unstemmed True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
title_short True active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
title_sort true active surface area as a key indicator of corrosion behavior in additively manufactured 316l stainless steel
topic True active surface
Additive manufacturing
316L stainless steel
Surface roughness
Corrosion
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127523009759
work_keys_str_mv AT seongkoocho trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT stevenfbuchsbaum trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT monikabiener trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT justinjones trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT michaelamelia trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT jamieastull trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT hectorrcolonmercado trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT jonathandwyer trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel
AT srogerqiu trueactivesurfaceareaasakeyindicatorofcorrosionbehaviorinadditivelymanufactured316lstainlesssteel