CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure

Abstract Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have had recent cardiac surgery, myocardial infarct or pulmonary hypertension. The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices before organ failure occurs can improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhishek Chaturvedi, Yonatan Rotman, Timothy Hoang, Greg Jew, Aniruddh Mandalapu, Craig Narins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-07-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01469-8
_version_ 1797778813938040832
author Abhishek Chaturvedi
Yonatan Rotman
Timothy Hoang
Greg Jew
Aniruddh Mandalapu
Craig Narins
author_facet Abhishek Chaturvedi
Yonatan Rotman
Timothy Hoang
Greg Jew
Aniruddh Mandalapu
Craig Narins
author_sort Abhishek Chaturvedi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have had recent cardiac surgery, myocardial infarct or pulmonary hypertension. The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices before organ failure occurs can improve outcomes in these patients. Imaging plays a key role in identifying appropriate positioning of MCS devices for supporting ventricle function. These devices can be used for left ventricle, right ventricle or biventricular support. Fluoroscopy, angiography and echocardiography are used for implanting these devices. Radiographs and CT can identify both intra- and extra-cardiac complications. The cardiothoracic imager will see increasing use of these devices and familiarity with their normal appearance and complications is important. Critical relevance statement Chest radiographs and CT are useful for assessing the position of the mechanical cardiac support device used for treatment of acute heart failure. CT can identify cardiac and extra-cardiac complications associated with these devices. Graphical abstract Key points IABP upper/distal marker should be 2–3 cm distal to the ostia of the left subclavian artery. Inlet of Impella CP should be 3.5 cm below the aortic valve. The Impella 5.5 does not have a pigtail portion. The inlet should be about 5 cm below the aortic annulus. Impella RP inlet port should be in the right atrium or inferior vena cava, the pigtail portion should be positioned in the main pulmonary artery. Protek Duo inflow is in the right atrium or right ventricle. The outflow is in the main pulmonary artery.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:22:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bb9facdcea24a5fb18e0d9cc1cc9f22
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-4101
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:22:58Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Insights into Imaging
spelling doaj.art-1bb9facdcea24a5fb18e0d9cc1cc9f222023-07-16T11:19:01ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012023-07-0114111410.1186/s13244-023-01469-8CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failureAbhishek Chaturvedi0Yonatan Rotman1Timothy Hoang2Greg Jew3Aniruddh Mandalapu4Craig Narins5Department of Imaging Science, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Rochester Medical CenterDepartment of Imaging Science, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Rochester Medical CenterDepartment of Imaging Science, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Rochester Medical CenterDepartment of Imaging Science, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Rochester Medical CenterDepartment of Imaging Science, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Rochester Medical CenterDepartment of Medicine, Interventional Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical CenterAbstract Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have had recent cardiac surgery, myocardial infarct or pulmonary hypertension. The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices before organ failure occurs can improve outcomes in these patients. Imaging plays a key role in identifying appropriate positioning of MCS devices for supporting ventricle function. These devices can be used for left ventricle, right ventricle or biventricular support. Fluoroscopy, angiography and echocardiography are used for implanting these devices. Radiographs and CT can identify both intra- and extra-cardiac complications. The cardiothoracic imager will see increasing use of these devices and familiarity with their normal appearance and complications is important. Critical relevance statement Chest radiographs and CT are useful for assessing the position of the mechanical cardiac support device used for treatment of acute heart failure. CT can identify cardiac and extra-cardiac complications associated with these devices. Graphical abstract Key points IABP upper/distal marker should be 2–3 cm distal to the ostia of the left subclavian artery. Inlet of Impella CP should be 3.5 cm below the aortic valve. The Impella 5.5 does not have a pigtail portion. The inlet should be about 5 cm below the aortic annulus. Impella RP inlet port should be in the right atrium or inferior vena cava, the pigtail portion should be positioned in the main pulmonary artery. Protek Duo inflow is in the right atrium or right ventricle. The outflow is in the main pulmonary artery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01469-8Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)Impella pumpImpella RPProtek DuoTandem Heart
spellingShingle Abhishek Chaturvedi
Yonatan Rotman
Timothy Hoang
Greg Jew
Aniruddh Mandalapu
Craig Narins
CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
Insights into Imaging
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
Impella pump
Impella RP
Protek Duo
Tandem Heart
title CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
title_full CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
title_fullStr CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
title_full_unstemmed CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
title_short CT and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
title_sort ct and chest radiography in evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices for acute heart failure
topic Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
Impella pump
Impella RP
Protek Duo
Tandem Heart
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01469-8
work_keys_str_mv AT abhishekchaturvedi ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure
AT yonatanrotman ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure
AT timothyhoang ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure
AT gregjew ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure
AT aniruddhmandalapu ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure
AT craignarins ctandchestradiographyinevaluationofmechanicalcirculatorysupportdevicesforacuteheartfailure