To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples

Understanding learning processes in an example-based environment is of interest to scholars from various disciplines. This qualitative study presents the missing perspective: the emotional and motivational aspects that accompany learning in an example-based environment. The participants of our study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hava Greensfeld, Efrat Nevo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Cogent Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1323381
_version_ 1829531368795668480
author Hava Greensfeld
Efrat Nevo
author_facet Hava Greensfeld
Efrat Nevo
author_sort Hava Greensfeld
collection DOAJ
description Understanding learning processes in an example-based environment is of interest to scholars from various disciplines. This qualitative study presents the missing perspective: the emotional and motivational aspects that accompany learning in an example-based environment. The participants of our study were 70 students in four classes (2010–2013) of “The Learning Processes,” an academic course at a teacher-education college. Research tools were: An open questionnaire to expose the students’ preconceptions regarding the use of a library of examples in learning processes, three reflective journals, observations, and a designated library of examples. In this study we adopted a unique pedagogical strategy, both in constructing the library of examples and in determining when the examples would be studied. Content analysis revealed two contrasting approaches : the “objecting” versus the “agreeing”; these led to identification of six academic emotional types (three “objecting” types and three “agreeing” types) of users of the example-based environment. The processes that caused each student to behave in a particular way were found to be complex, with external-behavioral expressions (actual use of examples), and internal expressions. These were related to each type’s focused achievement goal, academic self-concept, and to social-academic emotions aroused in this environment. The present study broadens the implications of the theory of learning through examples, and emphasizes the widely varied preferences of learners in a an example-rich environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:20:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bc52f8204914f5aa11208c63a54f3a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1886
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:20:20Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1bc52f8204914f5aa11208c63a54f3a22022-12-21T22:21:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862017-01-013110.1080/23311886.2017.13233811323381To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examplesHava Greensfeld0Efrat Nevo1Michlalah Jerusalem CollegeMichlalah Jerusalem CollegeUnderstanding learning processes in an example-based environment is of interest to scholars from various disciplines. This qualitative study presents the missing perspective: the emotional and motivational aspects that accompany learning in an example-based environment. The participants of our study were 70 students in four classes (2010–2013) of “The Learning Processes,” an academic course at a teacher-education college. Research tools were: An open questionnaire to expose the students’ preconceptions regarding the use of a library of examples in learning processes, three reflective journals, observations, and a designated library of examples. In this study we adopted a unique pedagogical strategy, both in constructing the library of examples and in determining when the examples would be studied. Content analysis revealed two contrasting approaches : the “objecting” versus the “agreeing”; these led to identification of six academic emotional types (three “objecting” types and three “agreeing” types) of users of the example-based environment. The processes that caused each student to behave in a particular way were found to be complex, with external-behavioral expressions (actual use of examples), and internal expressions. These were related to each type’s focused achievement goal, academic self-concept, and to social-academic emotions aroused in this environment. The present study broadens the implications of the theory of learning through examples, and emphasizes the widely varied preferences of learners in a an example-rich environment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1323381academic emotionslearning through exampleachievement goalsacademic self-conceptsocial-academic emotions
spellingShingle Hava Greensfeld
Efrat Nevo
To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
Cogent Social Sciences
academic emotions
learning through example
achievement goals
academic self-concept
social-academic emotions
title To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
title_full To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
title_fullStr To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
title_full_unstemmed To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
title_short To use or not to use, that is the question: On students’ encounters with a library of examples
title_sort to use or not to use that is the question on students encounters with a library of examples
topic academic emotions
learning through example
achievement goals
academic self-concept
social-academic emotions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1323381
work_keys_str_mv AT havagreensfeld touseornottousethatisthequestiononstudentsencounterswithalibraryofexamples
AT efratnevo touseornottousethatisthequestiononstudentsencounterswithalibraryofexamples