The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research

The WellComm toolkit is used across many areas of the UK to identify and support early years children with their speech, language and communication. There is some evidence for positive outcomes for children who are assessed and supported using the toolkit. However, wider implications of implementing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Dysart, Aimee Code
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/3/263
_version_ 1797241358282391552
author Erin Dysart
Aimee Code
author_facet Erin Dysart
Aimee Code
author_sort Erin Dysart
collection DOAJ
description The WellComm toolkit is used across many areas of the UK to identify and support early years children with their speech, language and communication. There is some evidence for positive outcomes for children who are assessed and supported using the toolkit. However, wider implications of implementing the toolkit have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to explore the impact of implementing the WellComm toolkit on practitioners, practically and for their knowledge and skills. An additional aim was to reflect on the impact this may have on evaluation research. Early years practitioners (EYPs) in the UK completed an online survey asking about their experiences of using the WellComm toolkit, and a sub-sample participated in interviews. Survey and interview respondents spanned different early years settings. Practitioners described positive ways in which using the WellComm toolkit had impacted their knowledge of speech, language and communication, supported improvements in practice, and the quality and specificity of speech and language referrals. Negative implications, such as time costs and staffing burdens, were also discussed but were found not to outweigh the benefits of use. The positive implications of using the WellComm toolkit on practitioners’ own development and knowledge are likely to support the outcomes of children, though the usefulness of the WellComm toolkit for children who speak English as an additional language (EAL) and children with special educational needs (SEND) is questioned. Such findings have implications for the work of evaluation researchers, who need to be sensitive to the use of such toolkits in settings where interventions are being evaluated.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:22:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bc60bac0d0f48cbaa5d3b70b1b0aa71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:22:03Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1bc60bac0d0f48cbaa5d3b70b1b0aa712024-03-27T13:34:21ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022024-03-0114326310.3390/educsci14030263The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation ResearchErin Dysart0Aimee Code1Department of Education, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UKDepartment of Education, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UKThe WellComm toolkit is used across many areas of the UK to identify and support early years children with their speech, language and communication. There is some evidence for positive outcomes for children who are assessed and supported using the toolkit. However, wider implications of implementing the toolkit have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to explore the impact of implementing the WellComm toolkit on practitioners, practically and for their knowledge and skills. An additional aim was to reflect on the impact this may have on evaluation research. Early years practitioners (EYPs) in the UK completed an online survey asking about their experiences of using the WellComm toolkit, and a sub-sample participated in interviews. Survey and interview respondents spanned different early years settings. Practitioners described positive ways in which using the WellComm toolkit had impacted their knowledge of speech, language and communication, supported improvements in practice, and the quality and specificity of speech and language referrals. Negative implications, such as time costs and staffing burdens, were also discussed but were found not to outweigh the benefits of use. The positive implications of using the WellComm toolkit on practitioners’ own development and knowledge are likely to support the outcomes of children, though the usefulness of the WellComm toolkit for children who speak English as an additional language (EAL) and children with special educational needs (SEND) is questioned. Such findings have implications for the work of evaluation researchers, who need to be sensitive to the use of such toolkits in settings where interventions are being evaluated.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/3/263practitioner knowledgeevaluationresearch implications
spellingShingle Erin Dysart
Aimee Code
The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
Education Sciences
practitioner knowledge
evaluation
research implications
title The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
title_full The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
title_fullStr The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
title_full_unstemmed The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
title_short The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
title_sort wellcomm toolkit impact on practitioner skills and knowledge and implications for evaluation research
topic practitioner knowledge
evaluation
research implications
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/3/263
work_keys_str_mv AT erindysart thewellcommtoolkitimpactonpractitionerskillsandknowledgeandimplicationsforevaluationresearch
AT aimeecode thewellcommtoolkitimpactonpractitionerskillsandknowledgeandimplicationsforevaluationresearch
AT erindysart wellcommtoolkitimpactonpractitionerskillsandknowledgeandimplicationsforevaluationresearch
AT aimeecode wellcommtoolkitimpactonpractitionerskillsandknowledgeandimplicationsforevaluationresearch