Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model

Valved conduits are often required to replace pulmonary arteries (PA). A widely used Contegra device is made of bovine jugular vein (BJV), preserved with glutaraldehyde (GA) and iso-propanol. However, it has several drawbacks that may be attributed to its chemical treatment. We hypothesized that the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nataliya R. Nichay, Anna A. Dokuchaeva, Yuriy Yu. Kulyabin, Evgeniy V. Boyarkin, Elena V. Kuznetsova, Yanina L. Rusakova, Ivan S. Murashov, Andrey A. Vaver, Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev, Irina Yu. Zhuravleva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/11/11/3101
_version_ 1797460019881443328
author Nataliya R. Nichay
Anna A. Dokuchaeva
Yuriy Yu. Kulyabin
Evgeniy V. Boyarkin
Elena V. Kuznetsova
Yanina L. Rusakova
Ivan S. Murashov
Andrey A. Vaver
Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev
Irina Yu. Zhuravleva
author_facet Nataliya R. Nichay
Anna A. Dokuchaeva
Yuriy Yu. Kulyabin
Evgeniy V. Boyarkin
Elena V. Kuznetsova
Yanina L. Rusakova
Ivan S. Murashov
Andrey A. Vaver
Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev
Irina Yu. Zhuravleva
author_sort Nataliya R. Nichay
collection DOAJ
description Valved conduits are often required to replace pulmonary arteries (PA). A widely used Contegra device is made of bovine jugular vein (BJV), preserved with glutaraldehyde (GA) and iso-propanol. However, it has several drawbacks that may be attributed to its chemical treatment. We hypothesized that the use of an alternative preservation compound may significantly improve BJV conduit performance. This study aimed to compare the macroscopic and microscopic properties of the BJV treated with diepoxide (DE) and GA in a porcine model. Twelve DE-BJVs and four Contegra conduits were used for PA replacement in minipigs. To assess the isolated influence of GA, we included an additional control group—BJV treated with 0.625% GA (n = 4). The animals were withdrawn after 6 months of follow-up and the conduits were examined. Explanted DE-BJV had a soft elastic wall with no signs of thrombosis or calcification and good conduit integration, including myofibroblast germination, an ingrowth of soft connective tissue formations and remarkable neoangiogenesis. The inner surface of DE-BJVs was covered by a thin neointimal layer with a solid endothelium. Contegra grafts had a stiffer wall with thrombosis on the leaflets. Calcified foci, chondroid metaplasia, and hyalinosis were observed within the wall. The distal anastomotic sites had hyperplastic neointima, partially covered with the endothelium. The wall of GA-BJV was stiff and rigid with degenerative changes, a substantial amount of calcium deposits and dense fibrotic formations in adventitia. An irregular neointimal layer was presented in the anastomotic sites without endothelial cover in the GA BJV wall. These results demonstrate that DE treatment improves conduit integration and the endothelialization of the inner surface while preventing the mineralization of the BJV, which may reduce the risk of early conduit dysfunction.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:59:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bd05bbc86d84aa0b9350b7f2fd55828
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9059
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:59:15Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomedicines
spelling doaj.art-1bd05bbc86d84aa0b9350b7f2fd558282023-11-24T14:31:31ZengMDPI AGBiomedicines2227-90592023-11-011111310110.3390/biomedicines11113101Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig ModelNataliya R. Nichay0Anna A. Dokuchaeva1Yuriy Yu. Kulyabin2Evgeniy V. Boyarkin3Elena V. Kuznetsova4Yanina L. Rusakova5Ivan S. Murashov6Andrey A. Vaver7Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev8Irina Yu. Zhuravleva9E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630055, RussiaValved conduits are often required to replace pulmonary arteries (PA). A widely used Contegra device is made of bovine jugular vein (BJV), preserved with glutaraldehyde (GA) and iso-propanol. However, it has several drawbacks that may be attributed to its chemical treatment. We hypothesized that the use of an alternative preservation compound may significantly improve BJV conduit performance. This study aimed to compare the macroscopic and microscopic properties of the BJV treated with diepoxide (DE) and GA in a porcine model. Twelve DE-BJVs and four Contegra conduits were used for PA replacement in minipigs. To assess the isolated influence of GA, we included an additional control group—BJV treated with 0.625% GA (n = 4). The animals were withdrawn after 6 months of follow-up and the conduits were examined. Explanted DE-BJV had a soft elastic wall with no signs of thrombosis or calcification and good conduit integration, including myofibroblast germination, an ingrowth of soft connective tissue formations and remarkable neoangiogenesis. The inner surface of DE-BJVs was covered by a thin neointimal layer with a solid endothelium. Contegra grafts had a stiffer wall with thrombosis on the leaflets. Calcified foci, chondroid metaplasia, and hyalinosis were observed within the wall. The distal anastomotic sites had hyperplastic neointima, partially covered with the endothelium. The wall of GA-BJV was stiff and rigid with degenerative changes, a substantial amount of calcium deposits and dense fibrotic formations in adventitia. An irregular neointimal layer was presented in the anastomotic sites without endothelial cover in the GA BJV wall. These results demonstrate that DE treatment improves conduit integration and the endothelialization of the inner surface while preventing the mineralization of the BJV, which may reduce the risk of early conduit dysfunction.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/11/11/3101bovine jugular veinContegradiepoxideglutaraldehydepulmonary conduitright ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
spellingShingle Nataliya R. Nichay
Anna A. Dokuchaeva
Yuriy Yu. Kulyabin
Evgeniy V. Boyarkin
Elena V. Kuznetsova
Yanina L. Rusakova
Ivan S. Murashov
Andrey A. Vaver
Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev
Irina Yu. Zhuravleva
Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
Biomedicines
bovine jugular vein
Contegra
diepoxide
glutaraldehyde
pulmonary conduit
right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
title Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
title_full Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
title_fullStr Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
title_short Epoxy- versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Morphological Changes in a Pig Model
title_sort epoxy versus glutaraldehyde treated bovine jugular vein conduit for pulmonary valve replacement a comparison of morphological changes in a pig model
topic bovine jugular vein
Contegra
diepoxide
glutaraldehyde
pulmonary conduit
right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/11/11/3101
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliyarnichay epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT annaadokuchaeva epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT yuriyyukulyabin epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT evgeniyvboyarkin epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT elenavkuznetsova epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT yaninalrusakova epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT ivansmurashov epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT andreyavaver epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT alexandervbogachevprokophiev epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel
AT irinayuzhuravleva epoxyversusglutaraldehydetreatedbovinejugularveinconduitforpulmonaryvalvereplacementacomparisonofmorphologicalchangesinapigmodel