Testing team reasoning: Group identification is related to coordination in pure coordination games
Games of pure mutual interest require players to coordinate their choices without being able to communicate. One way to achieve this is through team-reasoning, asking ‘what should we choose’, rather than just assessing one’s own options from an individual perspective. It has been suggested that team...
Main Authors: | James Matthew Thom, Uzma Afzal, Natalie Gold |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18603/jdm18603.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Testing team reasoning: Group identification is related to coordination in pure coordination games
by: James Matthew Thom, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
“Forceful links make strong chains” – When using on-pitch challenges to develop team resilience in elite football
by: Ole Erik Grinde, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
How do jurors argue with one another?
by: Joshua Warren, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01) -
An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate
by: Chloe L. Swirsky, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01) -
Assessing the Duration of the Lead Appointed Party Coordination Tasks and Evaluating the Appropriate Team Composition on BIM Projects
by: Pavol Mayer, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)