Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya

Abstract Objectives Self-collection of genital specimens for high-risk types of human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection may increase cervical cancer screening uptake. We hypothesized that women would prefer self-collection to clinician-collection of genital specimens. To test this hypothesis, and wom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Griffins O. Manguro, Linnet N. Masese, Kishor Mandaliya, Susan M. Graham, R. Scott McClelland, Jennifer S. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:Reproductive Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-018-0651-z
_version_ 1818390366254006272
author Griffins O. Manguro
Linnet N. Masese
Kishor Mandaliya
Susan M. Graham
R. Scott McClelland
Jennifer S. Smith
author_facet Griffins O. Manguro
Linnet N. Masese
Kishor Mandaliya
Susan M. Graham
R. Scott McClelland
Jennifer S. Smith
author_sort Griffins O. Manguro
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Self-collection of genital specimens for high-risk types of human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection may increase cervical cancer screening uptake. We hypothesized that women would prefer self-collection to clinician-collection of genital specimens. To test this hypothesis, and women’s preference between two different self-collection approaches, a total of 199 women were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in Mombasa, Kenya. Materials and methods Participants provided self-collected specimens using the Evalyn cytobrush (Rovers) stored in a dry tube and the Viba cytobrush (Rovers) stored in wet Aptima media (Hologic). A clinician also collected cervical specimens for hrHPV testing and for cytology, and performed visual inspection using acetic acid. A post-examination questionnaire assessed preferences for the different methods of specimen collection. To test the difference in proportions for each collection method, we performed an exact binomial probability test, under the null hypothesis that women would prefer each specimen-collection method equally. Results Most women preferred clinician-collection over self-collection (68% versus 32%, p < 0.01). For self-collection, dry-self collection with the Evalyn brush was preferred over the wet-selection with the Viba brush (53% versus 27%, p < 0.01). There was no association between preference for self-collection and preference for a particular self-collection cytobrush. Conclusion Further research to understand and address obstacles to self-collection of genital specimens may be needed to improve the uptake of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, especially in settings with poor access to trained healthcare providers.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:56:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bd6a9acf9b746f19fd3e5740cace53d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1742-4755
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:56:29Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Reproductive Health
spelling doaj.art-1bd6a9acf9b746f19fd3e5740cace53d2022-12-21T23:16:21ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552018-12-011511810.1186/s12978-018-0651-zPreference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, KenyaGriffins O. Manguro0Linnet N. Masese1Kishor Mandaliya2Susan M. Graham3R. Scott McClelland4Jennifer S. Smith5Kenyatta National HospitalDepartment of Epidemiology, University of WashingtonPathcare LaboratoriesDepartments of Epidemiology, Global Health, and Medicine, University of WashingtonDepartments of Epidemiology, Global Health, and Medicine, University of WashingtonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillAbstract Objectives Self-collection of genital specimens for high-risk types of human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection may increase cervical cancer screening uptake. We hypothesized that women would prefer self-collection to clinician-collection of genital specimens. To test this hypothesis, and women’s preference between two different self-collection approaches, a total of 199 women were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in Mombasa, Kenya. Materials and methods Participants provided self-collected specimens using the Evalyn cytobrush (Rovers) stored in a dry tube and the Viba cytobrush (Rovers) stored in wet Aptima media (Hologic). A clinician also collected cervical specimens for hrHPV testing and for cytology, and performed visual inspection using acetic acid. A post-examination questionnaire assessed preferences for the different methods of specimen collection. To test the difference in proportions for each collection method, we performed an exact binomial probability test, under the null hypothesis that women would prefer each specimen-collection method equally. Results Most women preferred clinician-collection over self-collection (68% versus 32%, p < 0.01). For self-collection, dry-self collection with the Evalyn brush was preferred over the wet-selection with the Viba brush (53% versus 27%, p < 0.01). There was no association between preference for self-collection and preference for a particular self-collection cytobrush. Conclusion Further research to understand and address obstacles to self-collection of genital specimens may be needed to improve the uptake of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, especially in settings with poor access to trained healthcare providers.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-018-0651-zHrHPVSelf-collectionClinician-collectionCervical cancerScreeningKenya
spellingShingle Griffins O. Manguro
Linnet N. Masese
Kishor Mandaliya
Susan M. Graham
R. Scott McClelland
Jennifer S. Smith
Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
Reproductive Health
HrHPV
Self-collection
Clinician-collection
Cervical cancer
Screening
Kenya
title Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
title_full Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
title_fullStr Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
title_short Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya
title_sort preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening a cross sectional study of high risk women in mombasa kenya
topic HrHPV
Self-collection
Clinician-collection
Cervical cancer
Screening
Kenya
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-018-0651-z
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinsomanguro preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya
AT linnetnmasese preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya
AT kishormandaliya preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya
AT susanmgraham preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya
AT rscottmcclelland preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya
AT jenniferssmith preferenceofspecimencollectionmethodsforhumanpapillomavirusdetectionforcervicalcancerscreeningacrosssectionalstudyofhighriskwomeninmombasakenya