Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline

Abstract Background To produce quality data that informs valid clinical trial results and withstands regulatory inspection, trial sites should adhere to many complex and dynamic requirements. Understanding non-conformance to requirements informs the emerging field of improvement science. We describe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatima Laher, Mookho Malahleha, Shelly Ramirez, William Brumskine, Kennedy Otwombe, Zoe Moodie, Mary Allen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01967-9
_version_ 1797795628314525696
author Fatima Laher
Mookho Malahleha
Shelly Ramirez
William Brumskine
Kennedy Otwombe
Zoe Moodie
Mary Allen
author_facet Fatima Laher
Mookho Malahleha
Shelly Ramirez
William Brumskine
Kennedy Otwombe
Zoe Moodie
Mary Allen
author_sort Fatima Laher
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To produce quality data that informs valid clinical trial results and withstands regulatory inspection, trial sites should adhere to many complex and dynamic requirements. Understanding non-conformance to requirements informs the emerging field of improvement science. We describe protocol deviations in South Africa’s largest HIV vaccine efficacy trial. Methods We analysed data from the HVTN 702 trial using mixed methods. We obtained descriptive statistics, from protocol deviation case report forms collected from 2016–2022, of deviation by participant, trial site, and time to site awareness. We thematically analysed text narratives of deviation descriptions, corrective and preventive actions, generating categories, codes and themes which emerged from the data. Results For 5407 enrollments, 4074 protocol deviations were reported (75 [95% CI: 73.0–77.6] deviations per 100 enrolments). There was a median of 1 protocol deviation per participant (IQR 1–2). Median time from deviation to site awareness was 31 days (IQR 0–146). The most common category of deviation type was omitted data and/or procedures (69%), and 54% of these omissions were stated to have arisen because of the national lockdown at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ratio of protocol deviations to cumulative enrolments was highest in the year 2020 (0.34). Major themes of deviations were: COVID-19 and climate disasters giving rise to deviation trends, subroutines introducing an opportunity for deviation, and document fragmentation (such as requirements dispersed across multiple guidance documents) as an obstacle. Preventive action categories were: no preventive measures; discipline, training and/or awareness; quality review, checking and verifying and changing the process and/or implementation tools. Major themes of preventive actions were that systems-based actions are unusual, with people-based actions dominating, and that root cause analysis was rarely mentioned. Conclusions In the age of infectious and climate disaster risks, trials may benefit from simple study designs and trial-related documents. To optimise protocol adherence, sponsors and sites should consider ongoing training, and routinely review deviation reports with a view to adjusting processes. These data quality lessons may inform future trial design, training and implementation. Trial registration HVTN 702 was registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Register (DOH-27–0916-5327) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02968849 ).
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:20:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1be99c806e25454cafdc9136ad67d926
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:20:52Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-1be99c806e25454cafdc9136ad67d9262023-06-25T11:20:35ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882023-06-0123111110.1186/s12874-023-01967-9Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with disciplineFatima Laher0Mookho Malahleha1Shelly Ramirez2William Brumskine3Kennedy Otwombe4Zoe Moodie5Mary Allen6Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the WitwatersrandSynergy Biomed Research InstituteVaccine and Infectious Disease DivisionThe Aurum Institute NPCPerinatal HIV Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the WitwatersrandVaccine and Infectious Disease DivisionVaccine Research Program, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of HealthAbstract Background To produce quality data that informs valid clinical trial results and withstands regulatory inspection, trial sites should adhere to many complex and dynamic requirements. Understanding non-conformance to requirements informs the emerging field of improvement science. We describe protocol deviations in South Africa’s largest HIV vaccine efficacy trial. Methods We analysed data from the HVTN 702 trial using mixed methods. We obtained descriptive statistics, from protocol deviation case report forms collected from 2016–2022, of deviation by participant, trial site, and time to site awareness. We thematically analysed text narratives of deviation descriptions, corrective and preventive actions, generating categories, codes and themes which emerged from the data. Results For 5407 enrollments, 4074 protocol deviations were reported (75 [95% CI: 73.0–77.6] deviations per 100 enrolments). There was a median of 1 protocol deviation per participant (IQR 1–2). Median time from deviation to site awareness was 31 days (IQR 0–146). The most common category of deviation type was omitted data and/or procedures (69%), and 54% of these omissions were stated to have arisen because of the national lockdown at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ratio of protocol deviations to cumulative enrolments was highest in the year 2020 (0.34). Major themes of deviations were: COVID-19 and climate disasters giving rise to deviation trends, subroutines introducing an opportunity for deviation, and document fragmentation (such as requirements dispersed across multiple guidance documents) as an obstacle. Preventive action categories were: no preventive measures; discipline, training and/or awareness; quality review, checking and verifying and changing the process and/or implementation tools. Major themes of preventive actions were that systems-based actions are unusual, with people-based actions dominating, and that root cause analysis was rarely mentioned. Conclusions In the age of infectious and climate disaster risks, trials may benefit from simple study designs and trial-related documents. To optimise protocol adherence, sponsors and sites should consider ongoing training, and routinely review deviation reports with a view to adjusting processes. These data quality lessons may inform future trial design, training and implementation. Trial registration HVTN 702 was registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Register (DOH-27–0916-5327) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02968849 ).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01967-9Protocol deviationPreventive actionClinical trial, Data qualityImprovement science
spellingShingle Fatima Laher
Mookho Malahleha
Shelly Ramirez
William Brumskine
Kennedy Otwombe
Zoe Moodie
Mary Allen
Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Protocol deviation
Preventive action
Clinical trial, Data quality
Improvement science
title Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
title_full Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
title_fullStr Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
title_full_unstemmed Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
title_short Data quality in an HIV vaccine efficacy clinical trial in South Africa: through natural disasters and with discipline
title_sort data quality in an hiv vaccine efficacy clinical trial in south africa through natural disasters and with discipline
topic Protocol deviation
Preventive action
Clinical trial, Data quality
Improvement science
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01967-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fatimalaher dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT mookhomalahleha dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT shellyramirez dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT williambrumskine dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT kennedyotwombe dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT zoemoodie dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline
AT maryallen dataqualityinanhivvaccineefficacyclinicaltrialinsouthafricathroughnaturaldisastersandwithdiscipline