Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials

Introduction: The aim of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the parameters of exogenous evoked potentials (visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype of both neuromuscular junction disease and autoimmune disease. The study also seeks to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edyta Dziadkowiak, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Małgorzata Wieczorek, Joanna Bladowska, Sławomir Budrewicz, Maria Ejma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1057
_version_ 1827685695426134016
author Edyta Dziadkowiak
Marta Waliszewska-Prosół
Małgorzata Wieczorek
Joanna Bladowska
Sławomir Budrewicz
Maria Ejma
author_facet Edyta Dziadkowiak
Marta Waliszewska-Prosół
Małgorzata Wieczorek
Joanna Bladowska
Sławomir Budrewicz
Maria Ejma
author_sort Edyta Dziadkowiak
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The aim of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the parameters of exogenous evoked potentials (visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype of both neuromuscular junction disease and autoimmune disease. The study also seeks to isolate electrophysiological changes that may indicate disorders within the central and/or peripheral nervous system. Methods: A total of forty-two consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis (24 women, 18 men) were included in the study. All of the patients underwent EP examination. MR images were also analyzed. Results: In the group of MG patients, the latency of P100 (113.9 ± 13.9; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) VEP, wave III (3.92 ± 0.29; <i>p</i> = 0.015), wave V (5.93 ± 0.32; <0.0001), interlatency III–V (2.00 ± 0.12; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), interlatency I–V (4.20 ± 0.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001) BAEP, and all components of SEP (N9, P10, N13, P16, N20, P22) were significantly longer. Mean wave I and V amplitude BAEP were relatively lower. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest the presence of disturbances in the bioelectric activities of the central and peripheral nervous system in MG patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:58:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bf3e78985dc4b26b61f4df39b96636e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:58:09Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1bf3e78985dc4b26b61f4df39b96636e2023-11-22T06:59:29ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-08-01118105710.3390/brainsci11081057Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked PotentialsEdyta Dziadkowiak0Marta Waliszewska-Prosół1Małgorzata Wieczorek2Joanna Bladowska3Sławomir Budrewicz4Maria Ejma5Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandFaculty of Earth Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Wroclaw, 50-137 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of General Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandIntroduction: The aim of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the parameters of exogenous evoked potentials (visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype of both neuromuscular junction disease and autoimmune disease. The study also seeks to isolate electrophysiological changes that may indicate disorders within the central and/or peripheral nervous system. Methods: A total of forty-two consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis (24 women, 18 men) were included in the study. All of the patients underwent EP examination. MR images were also analyzed. Results: In the group of MG patients, the latency of P100 (113.9 ± 13.9; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) VEP, wave III (3.92 ± 0.29; <i>p</i> = 0.015), wave V (5.93 ± 0.32; <0.0001), interlatency III–V (2.00 ± 0.12; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), interlatency I–V (4.20 ± 0.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001) BAEP, and all components of SEP (N9, P10, N13, P16, N20, P22) were significantly longer. Mean wave I and V amplitude BAEP were relatively lower. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest the presence of disturbances in the bioelectric activities of the central and peripheral nervous system in MG patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1057myasthenia gravisvisual evoked potentialsbrainstem auditory evoked potentialssomatosensory evoked potentials
spellingShingle Edyta Dziadkowiak
Marta Waliszewska-Prosół
Małgorzata Wieczorek
Joanna Bladowska
Sławomir Budrewicz
Maria Ejma
Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
Brain Sciences
myasthenia gravis
visual evoked potentials
brainstem auditory evoked potentials
somatosensory evoked potentials
title Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
title_full Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
title_short Myasthenia Gravis—An Analysis of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
title_sort myasthenia gravis an analysis of multimodal evoked potentials
topic myasthenia gravis
visual evoked potentials
brainstem auditory evoked potentials
somatosensory evoked potentials
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1057
work_keys_str_mv AT edytadziadkowiak myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials
AT martawaliszewskaprosoł myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials
AT małgorzatawieczorek myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials
AT joannabladowska myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials
AT sławomirbudrewicz myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials
AT mariaejma myastheniagravisananalysisofmultimodalevokedpotentials