Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation

The annotation of functional neuroimaging results for data sharing and reuse is particularly challenging, due to the diversity of terminologies of neuroanatomical structures and cortical parcellation schemes. To address this challenge, we extended the Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology (FMA) to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica A Turner, Jose L. V Mejino, James F Brinkley, Landon T Detwiler, Hyo Jong Lee, Maryann E Martone, Daniel L Rubin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00010/full
_version_ 1819241121191034880
author Jessica A Turner
Jose L. V Mejino
James F Brinkley
Landon T Detwiler
Hyo Jong Lee
Maryann E Martone
Daniel L Rubin
author_facet Jessica A Turner
Jose L. V Mejino
James F Brinkley
Landon T Detwiler
Hyo Jong Lee
Maryann E Martone
Daniel L Rubin
author_sort Jessica A Turner
collection DOAJ
description The annotation of functional neuroimaging results for data sharing and reuse is particularly challenging, due to the diversity of terminologies of neuroanatomical structures and cortical parcellation schemes. To address this challenge, we extended the Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology (FMA) to include cytoarchitectural, Brodmann area labels, and a morphological cortical labeling scheme (e.g., the part of Brodmann area 6 in the left precentral gyrus). This representation was also used to augment the neuroanatomical axis of RadLex, the ontology for clinical imaging. The resulting neuroanatomical ontology contains explicit relationships indicating which brain regions are “part of” which other regions, across cytoarchitectural and morphological labeling schemas. We annotated a large functional neuroimaging dataset with terms from the ontology and applied a reasoning engine to analyze this dataset in conjunction with the ontology, and achieved successful inferences from the most specific level (e.g., how many subjects showed activation in a sub-part of the middle frontal gyrus) to more general (how many activations were found in areas connected via a known white matter tract?). In summary, we have produced a neuroanatomical ontology that harmonizes several different terminologies of neuroanatomical structures and cortical parcellation schemes. This neuranatomical ontology is publicly available as a view of FMA at the Bioportal website at http://rest.bioontology.org/bioportal/ontologies/download/10005. The ontological encoding of anatomic knowledge can be exploited by computer reasoning engines to make inferences about neuroanatomical relationships described in imaging datasets using different terminologies. This approach could ultimately enable knowledge discovery from large, distributed fMRI studies or medical record mining.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T14:18:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1bfc5d76bc8b4c729a994137f05288d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5196
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T14:18:52Z
publishDate 2010-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
spelling doaj.art-1bfc5d76bc8b4c729a994137f05288d52022-12-21T17:43:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics1662-51962010-06-01410.3389/fninf.2010.000101317Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotationJessica A Turner0Jose L. V Mejino1James F Brinkley2Landon T Detwiler3Hyo Jong Lee4Maryann E Martone5Daniel L Rubin6MIND Research NetworkUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonMIND Research NetworkUniversity of California Stanford UniversityThe annotation of functional neuroimaging results for data sharing and reuse is particularly challenging, due to the diversity of terminologies of neuroanatomical structures and cortical parcellation schemes. To address this challenge, we extended the Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology (FMA) to include cytoarchitectural, Brodmann area labels, and a morphological cortical labeling scheme (e.g., the part of Brodmann area 6 in the left precentral gyrus). This representation was also used to augment the neuroanatomical axis of RadLex, the ontology for clinical imaging. The resulting neuroanatomical ontology contains explicit relationships indicating which brain regions are “part of” which other regions, across cytoarchitectural and morphological labeling schemas. We annotated a large functional neuroimaging dataset with terms from the ontology and applied a reasoning engine to analyze this dataset in conjunction with the ontology, and achieved successful inferences from the most specific level (e.g., how many subjects showed activation in a sub-part of the middle frontal gyrus) to more general (how many activations were found in areas connected via a known white matter tract?). In summary, we have produced a neuroanatomical ontology that harmonizes several different terminologies of neuroanatomical structures and cortical parcellation schemes. This neuranatomical ontology is publicly available as a view of FMA at the Bioportal website at http://rest.bioontology.org/bioportal/ontologies/download/10005. The ontological encoding of anatomic knowledge can be exploited by computer reasoning engines to make inferences about neuroanatomical relationships described in imaging datasets using different terminologies. This approach could ultimately enable knowledge discovery from large, distributed fMRI studies or medical record mining.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00010/fullData MiningNeuroanatomyontology
spellingShingle Jessica A Turner
Jose L. V Mejino
James F Brinkley
Landon T Detwiler
Hyo Jong Lee
Maryann E Martone
Daniel L Rubin
Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Data Mining
Neuroanatomy
ontology
title Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
title_full Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
title_fullStr Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
title_full_unstemmed Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
title_short Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
title_sort application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation
topic Data Mining
Neuroanatomy
ontology
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00010/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicaaturner applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT joselvmejino applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT jamesfbrinkley applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT landontdetwiler applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT hyojonglee applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT maryannemartone applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation
AT daniellrubin applicationofneuroanatomicalontologiesforneuroimagingdataannotation