Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora

The beneficial modes of probiotic action include regulation of intestinal microbial homeostasis, stabilization of the gastrointestinal barrier function expression of bacteriocins and interference with the ability of pathogens to colonize and infect the mucosa. Organic acids as feed additives have be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Král, Mária Angelovičová, Ebrahim Alfaig, Ondřej Bučko, Maria Walczycka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Agroprint Timisoara 2023-09-01
Series:Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://spasb.ro/index.php/public_html/article/view/129
_version_ 1797214666550673408
author Martin Král
Mária Angelovičová
Ebrahim Alfaig
Ondřej Bučko
Maria Walczycka
author_facet Martin Král
Mária Angelovičová
Ebrahim Alfaig
Ondřej Bučko
Maria Walczycka
author_sort Martin Král
collection DOAJ
description The beneficial modes of probiotic action include regulation of intestinal microbial homeostasis, stabilization of the gastrointestinal barrier function expression of bacteriocins and interference with the ability of pathogens to colonize and infect the mucosa. Organic acids as feed additives have been used to reduce or eliminate pathogenic bacteria and fungal contamination, control microbial growth and reduction of microbial metabolites. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Bacillus subtilis, acetic acid and their combination on the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens (Cobb 500). The experiment was carried out on 4 groups each contains 100 chicks as follows: control (without addition), treatment 1 (acetic acid), treatment 2 (Bacillus subtilis) and treatment 3 (acetic acid+Bacillus subtilis). Six samples from each group were selected as a sample (mixed sex). The highest average number of log CFU.g-1 Lactobacillus sp. was in the treatment 3–7.11 log CFU.g-1 and the lowest was in the control group–6.85. The highest average number of log CFU.g-1 Enterococcus sp. was in the treatment 2–7.17 log CFU.g-1 and the lowest was in the control group–5.65. In both observing additions of Bacillus subtilis and acetic acid increase the number of log CFU.g-1 Lactobacillus sp. and Enterococcus sp. compared with control group. The lower average number of log CFU.g-1 coliform bacteria was in the treatment 2–5.9 log CFU.g-1 and the higher was in control group–6.98. The additional supplement decreased the number of log CFU.g-1 coliform bacteria in the treatment groups compared with the control.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:17:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c031785a80048a9874c870173373f74
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1841-9364
2344-4576
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:17:48Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Agroprint Timisoara
record_format Article
series Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
spelling doaj.art-1c031785a80048a9874c870173373f742024-04-11T05:08:27ZengAgroprint TimisoaraScientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies1841-93642344-45762023-09-014722222129Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal MicrofloraMartin Král0Mária Angelovičová1Ebrahim Alfaig2Ondřej Bučko3Maria Walczycka4Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, SlovakiaSlovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, SlovakiaSlovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, SlovakiaSlovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, SlovakiaUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Food Technology, Department of Animal Product TechnologyThe beneficial modes of probiotic action include regulation of intestinal microbial homeostasis, stabilization of the gastrointestinal barrier function expression of bacteriocins and interference with the ability of pathogens to colonize and infect the mucosa. Organic acids as feed additives have been used to reduce or eliminate pathogenic bacteria and fungal contamination, control microbial growth and reduction of microbial metabolites. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Bacillus subtilis, acetic acid and their combination on the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens (Cobb 500). The experiment was carried out on 4 groups each contains 100 chicks as follows: control (without addition), treatment 1 (acetic acid), treatment 2 (Bacillus subtilis) and treatment 3 (acetic acid+Bacillus subtilis). Six samples from each group were selected as a sample (mixed sex). The highest average number of log CFU.g-1 Lactobacillus sp. was in the treatment 3–7.11 log CFU.g-1 and the lowest was in the control group–6.85. The highest average number of log CFU.g-1 Enterococcus sp. was in the treatment 2–7.17 log CFU.g-1 and the lowest was in the control group–5.65. In both observing additions of Bacillus subtilis and acetic acid increase the number of log CFU.g-1 Lactobacillus sp. and Enterococcus sp. compared with control group. The lower average number of log CFU.g-1 coliform bacteria was in the treatment 2–5.9 log CFU.g-1 and the higher was in control group–6.98. The additional supplement decreased the number of log CFU.g-1 coliform bacteria in the treatment groups compared with the control.https://spasb.ro/index.php/public_html/article/view/129acetic acidbacillus subtiliscobb500intestinal microflora
spellingShingle Martin Král
Mária Angelovičová
Ebrahim Alfaig
Ondřej Bučko
Maria Walczycka
Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
acetic acid
bacillus subtilis
cobb500
intestinal microflora
title Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
title_full Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
title_fullStr Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
title_short Influence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetic Acid on Cobb500 Intestinal Microflora
title_sort influence of bacillus subtilis and acetic acid on cobb500 intestinal microflora
topic acetic acid
bacillus subtilis
cobb500
intestinal microflora
url https://spasb.ro/index.php/public_html/article/view/129
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkral influenceofbacillussubtilisandaceticacidoncobb500intestinalmicroflora
AT mariaangelovicova influenceofbacillussubtilisandaceticacidoncobb500intestinalmicroflora
AT ebrahimalfaig influenceofbacillussubtilisandaceticacidoncobb500intestinalmicroflora
AT ondrejbucko influenceofbacillussubtilisandaceticacidoncobb500intestinalmicroflora
AT mariawalczycka influenceofbacillussubtilisandaceticacidoncobb500intestinalmicroflora