On a productive dialogue between religion and science
<p>Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pragmaticist manner, we typify the knowledge and select the types of knowl...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Scientia et Fides |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/SetF/article/view/15615 |
| _version_ | 1823934708520583168 |
|---|---|
| author | Enn Kasak Anne Kull |
| author_facet | Enn Kasak Anne Kull |
| author_sort | Enn Kasak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pragmaticist manner, we typify the knowledge and select the types of knowledge that might be useful for understanding the problems that are of interest to us.</p>We pose a question of how it would be possible to obtain practically useful information about reality, first from the perspective of natural sciences, and then from that of theology; that is, to diversify the ways of knowledge and just maybe, to move toward a productive dialogue between science and religion. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T22:24:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1c0a8137a4604a248cf24377fd189ee3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2300-7648 2353-5636 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T22:24:16Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientia et Fides |
| spelling | doaj.art-1c0a8137a4604a248cf24377fd189ee32022-12-21T22:13:55ZengUniwersytet Mikołaja KopernikaScientia et Fides2300-76482353-56362018-04-016112915310.12775/SetF.2018.00914194On a productive dialogue between religion and scienceEnn Kasak0Anne Kull1University of TartuUniversity of Tartu<p>Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pragmaticist manner, we typify the knowledge and select the types of knowledge that might be useful for understanding the problems that are of interest to us.</p>We pose a question of how it would be possible to obtain practically useful information about reality, first from the perspective of natural sciences, and then from that of theology; that is, to diversify the ways of knowledge and just maybe, to move toward a productive dialogue between science and religion.https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/SetF/article/view/15615knowledgepeircepragmaticismrealismtheology |
| spellingShingle | Enn Kasak Anne Kull On a productive dialogue between religion and science Scientia et Fides knowledge peirce pragmaticism realism theology |
| title | On a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| title_full | On a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| title_fullStr | On a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| title_full_unstemmed | On a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| title_short | On a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| title_sort | on a productive dialogue between religion and science |
| topic | knowledge peirce pragmaticism realism theology |
| url | https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/SetF/article/view/15615 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ennkasak onaproductivedialoguebetweenreligionandscience AT annekull onaproductivedialoguebetweenreligionandscience |