Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle>
Abstract. Many studies have evaluated the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) validity and reliability. Unfortunately, research on PID-5 in Southeast Asian countries is still limited. This study aimed to identify the structural validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of PID-5. We invo...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Hogrefe Publishing Group
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Psychological Test Adaptation and Development |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/2698-1866/a000010 |
| _version_ | 1827964005775310848 |
|---|---|
| author | Widhi Adhiatma Magdalena S. Halim |
| author_facet | Widhi Adhiatma Magdalena S. Halim |
| author_sort | Widhi Adhiatma |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract. Many studies have evaluated the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) validity and reliability. Unfortunately, research on PID-5 in Southeast Asian countries is still limited. This study aimed to identify the structural validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of PID-5. We involved 963 participants, and 68 of these participants filled the PID-5 twice. Facets and domains showed a satisfactory test–retest reliability (median r for facets = .84; median r for domains = .88), and acceptable McDonald’s omega indices (median ω for facets = .85; median ω for domains = .79). The hierarchical factor structure suggested that five-factor solution was interpretable, and this model showed a high congruency to its original version (ϕ = .97). Unfortunately, we could not achieve a model fit of this five-factor model. We hypothesized that the cultural influence and sample characteristics might explain this poor model fit. Finally, cautious administration and interpretation of PID-5 in Indonesia are highly recommended. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:07:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1c0b10bdf93a456d895349d35afdf62e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2698-1866 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:07:24Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Hogrefe Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Psychological Test Adaptation and Development |
| spelling | doaj.art-1c0b10bdf93a456d895349d35afdf62e2023-04-20T09:28:57ZengHogrefe Publishing GroupPsychological Test Adaptation and Development2698-18662021-12-0121627110.1027/2698-1866/a000010Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle>Widhi Adhiatma0Magdalena S. Halim1Faculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaAbstract. Many studies have evaluated the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) validity and reliability. Unfortunately, research on PID-5 in Southeast Asian countries is still limited. This study aimed to identify the structural validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of PID-5. We involved 963 participants, and 68 of these participants filled the PID-5 twice. Facets and domains showed a satisfactory test–retest reliability (median r for facets = .84; median r for domains = .88), and acceptable McDonald’s omega indices (median ω for facets = .85; median ω for domains = .79). The hierarchical factor structure suggested that five-factor solution was interpretable, and this model showed a high congruency to its original version (ϕ = .97). Unfortunately, we could not achieve a model fit of this five-factor model. We hypothesized that the cultural influence and sample characteristics might explain this poor model fit. Finally, cautious administration and interpretation of PID-5 in Indonesia are highly recommended.https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/2698-1866/a000010DSM-5PID-5structural validityfactor analysisreliability |
| spellingShingle | Widhi Adhiatma Magdalena S. Halim Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> Psychological Test Adaptation and Development DSM-5 PID-5 structural validity factor analysis reliability |
| title | Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> |
| title_full | Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> |
| title_fullStr | Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> |
| title_full_unstemmed | Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> |
| title_short | Structural Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of PID-5 <subtitle>Study on Community and Student Sample</subtitle> |
| title_sort | structural validity and reliability of the indonesian version of pid 5 subtitle study on community and student sample subtitle |
| topic | DSM-5 PID-5 structural validity factor analysis reliability |
| url | https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/2698-1866/a000010 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT widhiadhiatma structuralvalidityandreliabilityoftheindonesianversionofpid5subtitlestudyoncommunityandstudentsamplesubtitle AT magdalenashalim structuralvalidityandreliabilityoftheindonesianversionofpid5subtitlestudyoncommunityandstudentsamplesubtitle |