Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain is a controversial syndrome because insight in etiology and prognosis is lacking. The controversy relates to factors eliciting pain and some prognostic factors such as the interpre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klabbers Aldegonda BA, Bastiaanssen Janneke M, Vlaeyen Johan WS, Wolters Pieter MJC, de Bie Rob A, Bastiaenen Caroline HG, Heuts Annie, van den Brandt Piet A, Essed Gerard GM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/4/67
_version_ 1818551704676728832
author Klabbers Aldegonda BA
Bastiaanssen Janneke M
Vlaeyen Johan WS
Wolters Pieter MJC
de Bie Rob A
Bastiaenen Caroline HG
Heuts Annie
van den Brandt Piet A
Essed Gerard GM
author_facet Klabbers Aldegonda BA
Bastiaanssen Janneke M
Vlaeyen Johan WS
Wolters Pieter MJC
de Bie Rob A
Bastiaenen Caroline HG
Heuts Annie
van den Brandt Piet A
Essed Gerard GM
author_sort Klabbers Aldegonda BA
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain is a controversial syndrome because insight in etiology and prognosis is lacking. The controversy relates to factors eliciting pain and some prognostic factors such as the interpretation of pain at the symphysis. Recent research about treatment strategies also reflects those various opinions, in fact suggesting there is professional uncertainty about the optimal approach. Currently, physiotherapists often prescribe a pain-contingent treatment regime of relative rest and avoiding several day-to-day activities. Additionally, treatment more often includes an exercise program to guide rectification of the muscle imbalance and alignment of the pelvic girdle. Effectiveness of those interventions is not proven and the majority of the studies are methodologically flawed. Investigators draw particular attention to biomedical factors but there is growing evidence that important prognostic issues such as biopsychosocial factors appear to be even more important as point of action in a treatment program.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>This pragmatic randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailor-made treatment program with respect to biopsychosocial factors in primary care. The effect of the experimental intervention and usual care are evaluated as they are applied in primary health care. The trial is embedded in a cohort study that is designed as a longitudinal, prospective study, which studies prevalence, etiology, severity and prognosis during pregnancy until one year after delivery. The present paper focuses on choices regarding recruitment procedures, in-/exclusion criteria and the development of a well-timed intervention.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This section briefly discusses the actions taken to minimize bias in the design, the proper time-window for the experimental intervention and the contrast between the experimental intervention and usual care.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:03:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c118a72a8c84d4eabc0c5c2608eafd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:03:27Z
publishDate 2004-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-1c118a72a8c84d4eabc0c5c2608eafd72022-12-22T00:29:45ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582004-12-01416710.1186/1471-2458-4-67Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]Klabbers Aldegonda BABastiaanssen Janneke MVlaeyen Johan WSWolters Pieter MJCde Bie Rob ABastiaenen Caroline HGHeuts Annievan den Brandt Piet AEssed Gerard GM<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain is a controversial syndrome because insight in etiology and prognosis is lacking. The controversy relates to factors eliciting pain and some prognostic factors such as the interpretation of pain at the symphysis. Recent research about treatment strategies also reflects those various opinions, in fact suggesting there is professional uncertainty about the optimal approach. Currently, physiotherapists often prescribe a pain-contingent treatment regime of relative rest and avoiding several day-to-day activities. Additionally, treatment more often includes an exercise program to guide rectification of the muscle imbalance and alignment of the pelvic girdle. Effectiveness of those interventions is not proven and the majority of the studies are methodologically flawed. Investigators draw particular attention to biomedical factors but there is growing evidence that important prognostic issues such as biopsychosocial factors appear to be even more important as point of action in a treatment program.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>This pragmatic randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailor-made treatment program with respect to biopsychosocial factors in primary care. The effect of the experimental intervention and usual care are evaluated as they are applied in primary health care. The trial is embedded in a cohort study that is designed as a longitudinal, prospective study, which studies prevalence, etiology, severity and prognosis during pregnancy until one year after delivery. The present paper focuses on choices regarding recruitment procedures, in-/exclusion criteria and the development of a well-timed intervention.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This section briefly discusses the actions taken to minimize bias in the design, the proper time-window for the experimental intervention and the contrast between the experimental intervention and usual care.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/4/67
spellingShingle Klabbers Aldegonda BA
Bastiaanssen Janneke M
Vlaeyen Johan WS
Wolters Pieter MJC
de Bie Rob A
Bastiaenen Caroline HG
Heuts Annie
van den Brandt Piet A
Essed Gerard GM
Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
BMC Public Health
title Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
title_full Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
title_fullStr Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
title_short Treatment of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study [ISRCTN08477490]
title_sort treatment of pregnancy related pelvic girdle and or low back pain after delivery design of a randomized clinical trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study isrctn08477490
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/4/67
work_keys_str_mv AT klabbersaldegondaba treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT bastiaanssenjannekem treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT vlaeyenjohanws treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT wolterspietermjc treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT debieroba treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT bastiaenencarolinehg treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT heutsannie treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT vandenbrandtpieta treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490
AT essedgerardgm treatmentofpregnancyrelatedpelvicgirdleandorlowbackpainafterdeliverydesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialwithinacomprehensiveprognosticcohortstudyisrctn08477490