The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay

A sustainable diet that respects planetary boundaries is becoming increasingly important. When purchasing food, labels are one way to communicate sustainability features of a food product to the consumer. Recently, more and more sustainability labels are coming on the market or are being developed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristin Jürkenbeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784323000323
_version_ 1797682986496294912
author Kristin Jürkenbeck
author_facet Kristin Jürkenbeck
author_sort Kristin Jürkenbeck
collection DOAJ
description A sustainable diet that respects planetary boundaries is becoming increasingly important. When purchasing food, labels are one way to communicate sustainability features of a food product to the consumer. Recently, more and more sustainability labels are coming on the market or are being developed and tested. Therefore, this research evaluates the provision of information about different labels addressing sustainability and the resulting differences in consumers' preferences and willingness to pay. Data were obtained from an online survey consisting of choice experiments to assess four sustainability labels (Nutri-Score, Eco-Score, nutrition claims, and organic labels) and price. In total, 1087 consumers took part in the online survey in Germany. Consumers exhibited a high preference for interpretative labels and nutrition claims. With further information provided, consumers’ preferences or avoidance were even stronger for the interpretative labels. However, interpretative labels worked remarkably well without providing additional information. The willingness to pay was highest for the Eco-Score A and Nutri-Score A. Furthermore, the label category C of the interpretative labels seemed to have no effect on consumer preference. These findings hold great potential for marketing of food products and companies pricing policies.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:07:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c1963ed41f44eb89d44de6a1701d7bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-7843
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:07:52Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
spelling doaj.art-1c1963ed41f44eb89d44de6a1701d7bc2023-09-16T05:31:51ZengElsevierCleaner and Responsible Consumption2666-78432023-09-0110100131The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to payKristin Jürkenbeck0University of Goettingen, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073, Göttingen, GermanyA sustainable diet that respects planetary boundaries is becoming increasingly important. When purchasing food, labels are one way to communicate sustainability features of a food product to the consumer. Recently, more and more sustainability labels are coming on the market or are being developed and tested. Therefore, this research evaluates the provision of information about different labels addressing sustainability and the resulting differences in consumers' preferences and willingness to pay. Data were obtained from an online survey consisting of choice experiments to assess four sustainability labels (Nutri-Score, Eco-Score, nutrition claims, and organic labels) and price. In total, 1087 consumers took part in the online survey in Germany. Consumers exhibited a high preference for interpretative labels and nutrition claims. With further information provided, consumers’ preferences or avoidance were even stronger for the interpretative labels. However, interpretative labels worked remarkably well without providing additional information. The willingness to pay was highest for the Eco-Score A and Nutri-Score A. Furthermore, the label category C of the interpretative labels seemed to have no effect on consumer preference. These findings hold great potential for marketing of food products and companies pricing policies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784323000323Eco-scoreNutri-scoreOrganicChoice experimentFood labellingNutrition claim
spellingShingle Kristin Jürkenbeck
The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Eco-score
Nutri-score
Organic
Choice experiment
Food labelling
Nutrition claim
title The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
title_full The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
title_fullStr The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
title_full_unstemmed The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
title_short The effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay
title_sort effect of information among established and new sustainability labelling on consumers preference and willingness to pay
topic Eco-score
Nutri-score
Organic
Choice experiment
Food labelling
Nutrition claim
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784323000323
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinjurkenbeck theeffectofinformationamongestablishedandnewsustainabilitylabellingonconsumerspreferenceandwillingnesstopay
AT kristinjurkenbeck effectofinformationamongestablishedandnewsustainabilitylabellingonconsumerspreferenceandwillingnesstopay