VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?

Introduction: Between 14–20% of patients with critical lower-limb ischemia (CLI) are not candidates for revascularization due to extensive occlusions in crural/pedal vessels. Frequently these patients are young and functionally active. In these cases, the concept of shunting blood through veins to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inês Antunes, Carlos Pereira, Luís Loureiro, Gabriela Teixeira, Carlos Veiga, Daniel Mendes, Carlos Veterano, Henrique Rocha, João Castro, Rui Almeida
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular 2020-02-01
Series:Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/242
_version_ 1797951913488023552
author Inês Antunes
Carlos Pereira
Luís Loureiro
Gabriela Teixeira
Carlos Veiga
Daniel Mendes
Carlos Veterano
Henrique Rocha
João Castro
Rui Almeida
author_facet Inês Antunes
Carlos Pereira
Luís Loureiro
Gabriela Teixeira
Carlos Veiga
Daniel Mendes
Carlos Veterano
Henrique Rocha
João Castro
Rui Almeida
author_sort Inês Antunes
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Between 14–20% of patients with critical lower-limb ischemia (CLI) are not candidates for revascularization due to extensive occlusions in crural/pedal vessels. Frequently these patients are young and functionally active. In these cases, the concept of shunting blood through veins to get this reversed flow to reach the nutritive tissue capillary bed becomes attractive. Our aim is to report our very recent experience in venous arterialization. Material/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of venous arterialization performed in our institution between April 2018–2019. Results: Four patients were treated: 3 males/1 female with mean age of 58.5 years. All patients had PAD stage 4. All patients were studied with arteriography and ultrasound and were considerate no revascularizable (2 of them after an attempt of endovascular/surgical treatment). In one patient a trial with endovenous prostaglandin was performed, without clinical response. In all cases, the patients were facing a major amputation. Arterialization was performed as a last attempt to save the limb. Regarding the surgical procedures, the donor inflow artery was the infragenicular popliteal artery in 2 cases, distal femoral artery in 1 case and anterior tibial artery in 1 case. In 3 cases the bypass used the great saphenous vein (GSV) in situ to arterialize the medial marginal vein; in 1 case was used an inverted GSV bypass with the distal anastomosis at the posterior tibial vein. The venous valves were destroyed by combination of Fogarty catheter (proximally) and angioplasty balloon (distally). Collaterals were ligated to focalize the blood flow. In all patients marked improvement in foot perfusion was achieved. Two of them had excellent evolution in the postoperative period and healed foot lesions. One patient was amputated with permeable bypass. One patient presented good initial evolution but later had bypass thrombosis (presum- ably due to inadequate arterial inflow from the anterior tibial artery) and undergone major amputation. Discussion/Conclusions: Despite advances in surgical and endovascular techniques, an important number of patients with CLI are not candidates to arterial revascularization and most patients with inoperable CLI will face a major amputation. In that setting, venous arterialization should be considered but not all patients are candidates to this procedure and a careful preoperative evaluation is required. Our preliminary experience is encouraging: the procedure was relatively straightforward, the resulting improve in foot perfusion was surprisingly good, the patency rate and limb salvage rate was 75 and 50%. In our opinion the major issues are selection of inflow artery and outflow vein and the learning curve in interpretation of the angiographic result to guide optimal focalization of the blood flow.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:38:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c3042ef067d49fbaa521716f19268df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1646-706X
2183-0096
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:38:06Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
record_format Article
series Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
spelling doaj.art-1c3042ef067d49fbaa521716f19268df2023-01-16T09:09:12ZporSociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia VascularAngiologia e Cirurgia Vascular1646-706X2183-00962020-02-0115410.48750/acv.242VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?Inês Antunes0Carlos Pereira1Luís Loureiro2Gabriela Teixeira3Carlos Veiga4Daniel Mendes5Carlos Veterano6Henrique Rocha7João Castro8Rui Almeida9Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, PortugalServiço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal Introduction: Between 14–20% of patients with critical lower-limb ischemia (CLI) are not candidates for revascularization due to extensive occlusions in crural/pedal vessels. Frequently these patients are young and functionally active. In these cases, the concept of shunting blood through veins to get this reversed flow to reach the nutritive tissue capillary bed becomes attractive. Our aim is to report our very recent experience in venous arterialization. Material/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of venous arterialization performed in our institution between April 2018–2019. Results: Four patients were treated: 3 males/1 female with mean age of 58.5 years. All patients had PAD stage 4. All patients were studied with arteriography and ultrasound and were considerate no revascularizable (2 of them after an attempt of endovascular/surgical treatment). In one patient a trial with endovenous prostaglandin was performed, without clinical response. In all cases, the patients were facing a major amputation. Arterialization was performed as a last attempt to save the limb. Regarding the surgical procedures, the donor inflow artery was the infragenicular popliteal artery in 2 cases, distal femoral artery in 1 case and anterior tibial artery in 1 case. In 3 cases the bypass used the great saphenous vein (GSV) in situ to arterialize the medial marginal vein; in 1 case was used an inverted GSV bypass with the distal anastomosis at the posterior tibial vein. The venous valves were destroyed by combination of Fogarty catheter (proximally) and angioplasty balloon (distally). Collaterals were ligated to focalize the blood flow. In all patients marked improvement in foot perfusion was achieved. Two of them had excellent evolution in the postoperative period and healed foot lesions. One patient was amputated with permeable bypass. One patient presented good initial evolution but later had bypass thrombosis (presum- ably due to inadequate arterial inflow from the anterior tibial artery) and undergone major amputation. Discussion/Conclusions: Despite advances in surgical and endovascular techniques, an important number of patients with CLI are not candidates to arterial revascularization and most patients with inoperable CLI will face a major amputation. In that setting, venous arterialization should be considered but not all patients are candidates to this procedure and a careful preoperative evaluation is required. Our preliminary experience is encouraging: the procedure was relatively straightforward, the resulting improve in foot perfusion was surprisingly good, the patency rate and limb salvage rate was 75 and 50%. In our opinion the major issues are selection of inflow artery and outflow vein and the learning curve in interpretation of the angiographic result to guide optimal focalization of the blood flow. https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/242venous arterializationcritical limb ischemiamajor amputationrevascularization procedures
spellingShingle Inês Antunes
Carlos Pereira
Luís Loureiro
Gabriela Teixeira
Carlos Veiga
Daniel Mendes
Carlos Veterano
Henrique Rocha
João Castro
Rui Almeida
VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
venous arterialization
critical limb ischemia
major amputation
revascularization procedures
title VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
title_full VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
title_fullStr VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
title_full_unstemmed VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
title_short VENOUS ARTERIALIZATION FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH NO OPTION CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA ! A DESPERATE ATTEMPT OR AN EXPERIENCE"PROVED SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE?
title_sort venous arterialization for some patients with no option critical limb ischemia a desperate attempt or an experience proved successful technique
topic venous arterialization
critical limb ischemia
major amputation
revascularization procedures
url https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/242
work_keys_str_mv AT inesantunes venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT carlospereira venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT luisloureiro venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT gabrielateixeira venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT carlosveiga venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT danielmendes venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT carlosveterano venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT henriquerocha venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT joaocastro venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique
AT ruialmeida venousarterializationforsomepatientswithnooptioncriticallimbischemiaadesperateattemptoranexperienceprovedsuccessfultechnique