Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency

Internationally, teachers use oral reading fluency (ORF) measurements to monitor learning progress in reading and adapt instruction to the individual needs of students. In ORF measures, the child reads aloud single syllables, words, or short passages, and the teacher rates in parallel at which items...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jana Jungjohann, Jeffrey M. DeVries, Markus Gebhardt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/624
_version_ 1797595149562281984
author Jana Jungjohann
Jeffrey M. DeVries
Markus Gebhardt
author_facet Jana Jungjohann
Jeffrey M. DeVries
Markus Gebhardt
author_sort Jana Jungjohann
collection DOAJ
description Internationally, teachers use oral reading fluency (ORF) measurements to monitor learning progress in reading and adapt instruction to the individual needs of students. In ORF measures, the child reads aloud single syllables, words, or short passages, and the teacher rates in parallel at which items the child makes a mistake. Since administering paper-based ORF requires increased effort on the part of teachers, computer-based test administration is available. However, there are still concerns about the comparability of paper-based and computer-based test modes. In our study, we examine mode effects between paper-based and computer-based test scores for both reading speed and reading accuracy using a German-language ORF assessment for progress monitoring. 2nd- and 3rd-year-students (<i>N</i> = 359) with and without special education needs participated in the study. Results show comparable and high reliability (<i>r</i> > 0.76) and no differential item functioning for both test modes. Furthermore, students showed significantly higher reading speed on the paper-based test, while no differences were found in reading accuracy. In the absence of differential item functioning, we discuss how mean differences can be accounted for, how teachers can be trained to use the different test modes, and how computer-based tests can be safeguarded in practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:32:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c336c88cc98430b9e61b08b29451c18
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:32:24Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1c336c88cc98430b9e61b08b29451c182023-11-18T10:06:53ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022023-06-0113662410.3390/educsci13060624Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading FluencyJana Jungjohann0Jeffrey M. DeVries1Markus Gebhardt2Faculty of Human Science, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyCenter for Research on Education and School Development, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, GermanyFaculty of Human Science, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyInternationally, teachers use oral reading fluency (ORF) measurements to monitor learning progress in reading and adapt instruction to the individual needs of students. In ORF measures, the child reads aloud single syllables, words, or short passages, and the teacher rates in parallel at which items the child makes a mistake. Since administering paper-based ORF requires increased effort on the part of teachers, computer-based test administration is available. However, there are still concerns about the comparability of paper-based and computer-based test modes. In our study, we examine mode effects between paper-based and computer-based test scores for both reading speed and reading accuracy using a German-language ORF assessment for progress monitoring. 2nd- and 3rd-year-students (<i>N</i> = 359) with and without special education needs participated in the study. Results show comparable and high reliability (<i>r</i> > 0.76) and no differential item functioning for both test modes. Furthermore, students showed significantly higher reading speed on the paper-based test, while no differences were found in reading accuracy. In the absence of differential item functioning, we discuss how mean differences can be accounted for, how teachers can be trained to use the different test modes, and how computer-based tests can be safeguarded in practice.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/624computer-based assessmentdifferential item functioningoral reading fluencymode effectspaper-based assessmentprogress monitoring
spellingShingle Jana Jungjohann
Jeffrey M. DeVries
Markus Gebhardt
Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
Education Sciences
computer-based assessment
differential item functioning
oral reading fluency
mode effects
paper-based assessment
progress monitoring
title Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
title_full Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
title_fullStr Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
title_short Measuring Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Computer-Based and Paper-Based: Examining the Mode Effect in Reading Accuracy and Reading Fluency
title_sort measuring oral reading fluency orf computer based and paper based examining the mode effect in reading accuracy and reading fluency
topic computer-based assessment
differential item functioning
oral reading fluency
mode effects
paper-based assessment
progress monitoring
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/624
work_keys_str_mv AT janajungjohann measuringoralreadingfluencyorfcomputerbasedandpaperbasedexaminingthemodeeffectinreadingaccuracyandreadingfluency
AT jeffreymdevries measuringoralreadingfluencyorfcomputerbasedandpaperbasedexaminingthemodeeffectinreadingaccuracyandreadingfluency
AT markusgebhardt measuringoralreadingfluencyorfcomputerbasedandpaperbasedexaminingthemodeeffectinreadingaccuracyandreadingfluency