A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards
Abstract Teachers are a critical component to standards-based reform systems, which require that reforms conceived at the national level pass through several layers of the educational system before impacting learning in the classroom. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are an example of th...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00073-6 |
| _version_ | 1797846063739043840 |
|---|---|
| author | Jamie Tanas Gavin Fulmer |
| author_facet | Jamie Tanas Gavin Fulmer |
| author_sort | Jamie Tanas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Teachers are a critical component to standards-based reform systems, which require that reforms conceived at the national level pass through several layers of the educational system before impacting learning in the classroom. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are an example of this type of reform and pose significant challenges for alignment between levels given their three-dimensional nature alongside inclusion of ambitious and novel reform ideas. To examine translation of NGSS reforms across levels, we provide a content analysis of alignment messages conveyed to teachers through practitioner literature. Analysis indicates some coherence with national messaging around alignment to performance expectations and science and engineering practices. Additionally, alignment to broader reform ideas like engaging in science practices, integration, engineering, and focus on phenomena were represented to teachers. However, qualitative analysis of these representations indicate that reforms are often superficially portrayed, variably defined, or missing altogether. Findings indicate that teachers receive numerous messages regarding what it means to align to the NGSS and few elaborations on how to operationalize reforms. Our work suggests a need for intentional consideration of how to design representations for practitioners that consider teacher sensemaking around novel reforms. Additionally, we see a need for further development of coherence among the research community regarding alignment to the NGSS and agreement on definition of key reform ideas. Future work should consider how teachers use and understand these representations as they enact the NGSS in their local contexts. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:50:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1c39b11adeae4d2b81dbc75b32d456e2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2662-2300 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:50:03Z |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-1c39b11adeae4d2b81dbc75b32d456e22023-04-16T11:06:12ZengSpringerOpenDisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research2662-23002023-04-015111810.1186/s43031-023-00073-6A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science StandardsJamie Tanas0Gavin Fulmer1Department of Teaching and Learning, University of Iowa College of EducationDepartment of Teaching and Learning, University of Iowa College of EducationAbstract Teachers are a critical component to standards-based reform systems, which require that reforms conceived at the national level pass through several layers of the educational system before impacting learning in the classroom. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are an example of this type of reform and pose significant challenges for alignment between levels given their three-dimensional nature alongside inclusion of ambitious and novel reform ideas. To examine translation of NGSS reforms across levels, we provide a content analysis of alignment messages conveyed to teachers through practitioner literature. Analysis indicates some coherence with national messaging around alignment to performance expectations and science and engineering practices. Additionally, alignment to broader reform ideas like engaging in science practices, integration, engineering, and focus on phenomena were represented to teachers. However, qualitative analysis of these representations indicate that reforms are often superficially portrayed, variably defined, or missing altogether. Findings indicate that teachers receive numerous messages regarding what it means to align to the NGSS and few elaborations on how to operationalize reforms. Our work suggests a need for intentional consideration of how to design representations for practitioners that consider teacher sensemaking around novel reforms. Additionally, we see a need for further development of coherence among the research community regarding alignment to the NGSS and agreement on definition of key reform ideas. Future work should consider how teachers use and understand these representations as they enact the NGSS in their local contexts.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00073-6Next Generation Science StandardsAlignmentSensemakingStandards-based reform |
| spellingShingle | Jamie Tanas Gavin Fulmer A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research Next Generation Science Standards Alignment Sensemaking Standards-based reform |
| title | A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards |
| title_full | A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards |
| title_fullStr | A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards |
| title_full_unstemmed | A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards |
| title_short | A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards |
| title_sort | content analysis of alignment messages to the next generation science standards |
| topic | Next Generation Science Standards Alignment Sensemaking Standards-based reform |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00073-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jamietanas acontentanalysisofalignmentmessagestothenextgenerationsciencestandards AT gavinfulmer acontentanalysisofalignmentmessagestothenextgenerationsciencestandards AT jamietanas contentanalysisofalignmentmessagestothenextgenerationsciencestandards AT gavinfulmer contentanalysisofalignmentmessagestothenextgenerationsciencestandards |