A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française
In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe...
Main Author: | Olivier Leclerc |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Marcial Pons
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Quaestio Facti |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22389 |
Similar Items
-
A busca da verdade e a concretização da função Epistêmica do Processo
by: Fabiana Alves Mascarenhas, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Citing Testimony in Proceedings (its Terms, Validity, and Impact on Sentence of the Court)
by: Mysam Taram, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Scientific Questions of Fact Between Free Evaluation of Evidence and Proof Beyond any Reasonable Doubt in the Criminal Trial
by: Gaetano Carlizzi
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Forensic psychologist
by: Tinkara Pavšič Mrevlje
Published: (2011-04-01) -
Psychological criteria for assessing the credibility of testimonies given by the mentally ill
by: Małgorzata Sitarczyk
Published: (2012-12-01)