Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
Background: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO2 when using SCBA. Methods: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Safety and Health at Work |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117300975 |
_version_ | 1797765795633168384 |
---|---|
author | David Hostler David R. Pendergast |
author_facet | David Hostler David R. Pendergast |
author_sort | David Hostler |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO2 when using SCBA. Methods: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. Results: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption (V.O2) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO2 in controls but not firefighters. Conclusions: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO2, and presumably increased arterial CO2, during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO2 sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO2 sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined. Keywords: Carbon dioxide retention, Exercise, Protective equipment, Self-contained breathing apparatus |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:16:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1c4476a52a7a483786d5752675c62c23 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2093-7911 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:16:14Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Safety and Health at Work |
spelling | doaj.art-1c4476a52a7a483786d5752675c62c232023-08-02T01:18:22ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112018-12-0194468472Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and NonfirefightersDavid Hostler0David R. Pendergast1SUNY University at Buffalo, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Center for Research and Education in Special Environments (CRESE), USA; Corresponding author. University at Buffalo Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, 212 Kimball Tower Buffalo NY 14213, USA.SUNY University at Buffalo, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, USABackground: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO2 when using SCBA. Methods: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. Results: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption (V.O2) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO2 in controls but not firefighters. Conclusions: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO2, and presumably increased arterial CO2, during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO2 sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO2 sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined. Keywords: Carbon dioxide retention, Exercise, Protective equipment, Self-contained breathing apparatushttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117300975 |
spellingShingle | David Hostler David R. Pendergast Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters Safety and Health at Work |
title | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_full | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_fullStr | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_short | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_sort | respiratory responses during exercise in self contained breathing apparatus among firefighters and nonfirefighters |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117300975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidhostler respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters AT davidrpendergast respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters |