Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy

Objective: There continues to be controversy over whether operative delay is necessary for patients on antiplatelet therapy, particularly for elderly patients with hip fractures. This study sought to assess current clinical practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding perioperative management of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian A. Pean MS, Abraham Goch BS, Anthony Christiano BA, Sanjit Konda MD, Kenneth Egol MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-12-01
Series:Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458515605156
_version_ 1818537476842586112
author Christian A. Pean MS
Abraham Goch BS
Anthony Christiano BA
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth Egol MD
author_facet Christian A. Pean MS
Abraham Goch BS
Anthony Christiano BA
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth Egol MD
author_sort Christian A. Pean MS
collection DOAJ
description Objective: There continues to be controversy over whether operative delay is necessary for patients on antiplatelet therapy, particularly for elderly patients with hip fractures. This study sought to assess current clinical practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding perioperative management of these patients. Methods: A 12-question, Web-based survey was distributed to orthopedic surgeons via e-mail. Questions regarding timing of surgery assumed patients were on antiplatelet therapy and assessed attitudes toward emergent and nonemergent orthopedic cases as well as operative delay for specific closed fracture types. Responses were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed Student t tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value <.05. Results: Overall 67 orthopedic surgeons responded. Fifty-two percent (n = 35) of the respondents described their practice as academic. Thirty-nine percent (n = 25) of the surgeons indicated that no delay was acceptable for urgent but nonemergent surgery, and 78% (n = 50) reported no delay for emergent surgery was acceptable. Sixty-eight percent (n = 46) of respondents felt patients on antiplatelet therapy with closed hip fractures did not require operative delay. Surgeons who opted for surgical delay in hip fractures were more likely to delay surgery in other lower extremity fracture types (OR = 16.4, 95% CI 4.48-60.61, P < .001). Sixty-four percent (n = 41) of the surgeons indicated there was no protocol in place at their institution. Conclusions: There continues to be wide variability among orthopedic surgeons with regard to management of patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy. Over a quarter of surgeons continue to opt for surgical delay in patients with hip fracture. This survey highlights the need to formulate and better disseminate practice management guidelines for patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy, particularly given the aging population in the United States.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:51:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c58c79f89454d2783e618355f985831
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2151-4585
2151-4593
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:51:14Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-1c58c79f89454d2783e618355f9858312022-12-22T00:54:17ZengSAGE PublishingGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation2151-45852151-45932015-12-01610.1177/2151458515605156Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet TherapyChristian A. Pean MS0Abraham Goch BS1Anthony Christiano BA2Sanjit Konda MD3Kenneth Egol MD4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USAObjective: There continues to be controversy over whether operative delay is necessary for patients on antiplatelet therapy, particularly for elderly patients with hip fractures. This study sought to assess current clinical practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding perioperative management of these patients. Methods: A 12-question, Web-based survey was distributed to orthopedic surgeons via e-mail. Questions regarding timing of surgery assumed patients were on antiplatelet therapy and assessed attitudes toward emergent and nonemergent orthopedic cases as well as operative delay for specific closed fracture types. Responses were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed Student t tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value <.05. Results: Overall 67 orthopedic surgeons responded. Fifty-two percent (n = 35) of the respondents described their practice as academic. Thirty-nine percent (n = 25) of the surgeons indicated that no delay was acceptable for urgent but nonemergent surgery, and 78% (n = 50) reported no delay for emergent surgery was acceptable. Sixty-eight percent (n = 46) of respondents felt patients on antiplatelet therapy with closed hip fractures did not require operative delay. Surgeons who opted for surgical delay in hip fractures were more likely to delay surgery in other lower extremity fracture types (OR = 16.4, 95% CI 4.48-60.61, P < .001). Sixty-four percent (n = 41) of the surgeons indicated there was no protocol in place at their institution. Conclusions: There continues to be wide variability among orthopedic surgeons with regard to management of patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy. Over a quarter of surgeons continue to opt for surgical delay in patients with hip fracture. This survey highlights the need to formulate and better disseminate practice management guidelines for patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy, particularly given the aging population in the United States.https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458515605156
spellingShingle Christian A. Pean MS
Abraham Goch BS
Anthony Christiano BA
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth Egol MD
Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
title Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
title_full Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
title_fullStr Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
title_short Current Practices Regarding Perioperative Management of Patients With Fracture on Antiplatelet Therapy
title_sort current practices regarding perioperative management of patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458515605156
work_keys_str_mv AT christianapeanms currentpracticesregardingperioperativemanagementofpatientswithfractureonantiplatelettherapy
AT abrahamgochbs currentpracticesregardingperioperativemanagementofpatientswithfractureonantiplatelettherapy
AT anthonychristianoba currentpracticesregardingperioperativemanagementofpatientswithfractureonantiplatelettherapy
AT sanjitkondamd currentpracticesregardingperioperativemanagementofpatientswithfractureonantiplatelettherapy
AT kennethegolmd currentpracticesregardingperioperativemanagementofpatientswithfractureonantiplatelettherapy