Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Both endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS‐TBB) and computed tomography‐guided transthoracic needle biopsy (CT‐TTNB) are approaches commonly utilized to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The present meta‐analysis was, therefore, designed to provi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu‐Fei Fu, Jing‐Hao Zhang, Tao Wang, Yi‐Bing Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13275
_version_ 1828725863149993984
author Yu‐Fei Fu
Jing‐Hao Zhang
Tao Wang
Yi‐Bing Shi
author_facet Yu‐Fei Fu
Jing‐Hao Zhang
Tao Wang
Yi‐Bing Shi
author_sort Yu‐Fei Fu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Both endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS‐TBB) and computed tomography‐guided transthoracic needle biopsy (CT‐TTNB) are approaches commonly utilized to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The present meta‐analysis was, therefore, designed to provide more reliable evidence regarding the relative advantages of these two approaches to PPL diagnosis in order to guide clinical decision making. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published as of May 2020. Endpoint data pertaining to technical success rates, diagnostic accuracy, and complication rates were then extracted from these studies. Meta‐analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3. Results We identified nine total relevant studies for inclusion in the present meta‐analysis, incorporating 2025 total patients (2035 total procedures) that underwent EBUS‐TBB (n = 994) or CT‐TTNB (n = 1041) for the purposes of PPL diagnosis. Rates of technical success were comparable between these two groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.16; P = 0.21). However, CT‐TTNB was associated with higher diagnostic yield (OR: 0.23; P < 0.00001), greater accuracy (OR: 0.43; P = 0.002), and higher rates of complications (OR: 7.27; P < 0.00001) than was EBUS‐TBB. Subgroup analyses revealed that CT‐TTNB was associated with better diagnostic yield and accuracy when analyzing small lesions and lesions that were proximal to the pleura. Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected with respect to both technical success rates and diagnostic yield, but there was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions When diagnosing PPLs, CT‐TTNB is associated with higher diagnostic yield and accuracy but with poorer safety outcomes than EBUS‐TBB.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:33:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c5a3f426b1a47a197d70d300a5f977f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-6981
1752-699X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:33:29Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Clinical Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj.art-1c5a3f426b1a47a197d70d300a5f977f2022-12-22T03:31:05ZengWileyThe Clinical Respiratory Journal1752-69811752-699X2021-01-0115131010.1111/crj.13275Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysisYu‐Fei Fu0Jing‐Hao Zhang1Tao Wang2Yi‐Bing Shi3Department of Radiology Xuzhou Central Hospital Xuzhou ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Xuzhou Central Hospital Xuzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiology Xuzhou Central Hospital Xuzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiology Xuzhou Central Hospital Xuzhou ChinaAbstract Background Both endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS‐TBB) and computed tomography‐guided transthoracic needle biopsy (CT‐TTNB) are approaches commonly utilized to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The present meta‐analysis was, therefore, designed to provide more reliable evidence regarding the relative advantages of these two approaches to PPL diagnosis in order to guide clinical decision making. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published as of May 2020. Endpoint data pertaining to technical success rates, diagnostic accuracy, and complication rates were then extracted from these studies. Meta‐analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3. Results We identified nine total relevant studies for inclusion in the present meta‐analysis, incorporating 2025 total patients (2035 total procedures) that underwent EBUS‐TBB (n = 994) or CT‐TTNB (n = 1041) for the purposes of PPL diagnosis. Rates of technical success were comparable between these two groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.16; P = 0.21). However, CT‐TTNB was associated with higher diagnostic yield (OR: 0.23; P < 0.00001), greater accuracy (OR: 0.43; P = 0.002), and higher rates of complications (OR: 7.27; P < 0.00001) than was EBUS‐TBB. Subgroup analyses revealed that CT‐TTNB was associated with better diagnostic yield and accuracy when analyzing small lesions and lesions that were proximal to the pleura. Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected with respect to both technical success rates and diagnostic yield, but there was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions When diagnosing PPLs, CT‐TTNB is associated with higher diagnostic yield and accuracy but with poorer safety outcomes than EBUS‐TBB.https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13275biopsycomputed tomographyendobronchial ultrasoundperipheral pulmonary lesion
spellingShingle Yu‐Fei Fu
Jing‐Hao Zhang
Tao Wang
Yi‐Bing Shi
Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
biopsy
computed tomography
endobronchial ultrasound
peripheral pulmonary lesion
title Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
title_full Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
title_short Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis
title_sort endobronchial ultrasound guided versus computed tomography guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions a meta analysis
topic biopsy
computed tomography
endobronchial ultrasound
peripheral pulmonary lesion
url https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13275
work_keys_str_mv AT yufeifu endobronchialultrasoundguidedversuscomputedtomographyguidedbiopsyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsametaanalysis
AT jinghaozhang endobronchialultrasoundguidedversuscomputedtomographyguidedbiopsyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsametaanalysis
AT taowang endobronchialultrasoundguidedversuscomputedtomographyguidedbiopsyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsametaanalysis
AT yibingshi endobronchialultrasoundguidedversuscomputedtomographyguidedbiopsyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsametaanalysis