One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation

Abstract Aims Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) results in substantial improvement of prognosis and functional capacity. Currently, duration of MCS as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) is often prolonged due to shortage of donor hearts. Because long‐term results of exercise capacity after MCS are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne E.A. Felix, Martinus I.F. Oerlemans, Faiz Z. Ramjankhan, Steven A. Muller, Hans H. Kirkels, Linda W. vanLaake, Willem J.L. Suyker, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Nicolaas deJonge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13234
_version_ 1797976423863943168
author Susanne E.A. Felix
Martinus I.F. Oerlemans
Faiz Z. Ramjankhan
Steven A. Muller
Hans H. Kirkels
Linda W. vanLaake
Willem J.L. Suyker
Folkert W. Asselbergs
Nicolaas deJonge
author_facet Susanne E.A. Felix
Martinus I.F. Oerlemans
Faiz Z. Ramjankhan
Steven A. Muller
Hans H. Kirkels
Linda W. vanLaake
Willem J.L. Suyker
Folkert W. Asselbergs
Nicolaas deJonge
author_sort Susanne E.A. Felix
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) results in substantial improvement of prognosis and functional capacity. Currently, duration of MCS as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) is often prolonged due to shortage of donor hearts. Because long‐term results of exercise capacity after MCS are largely unknown, we studied serial cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) during the first year after MCS implantation. Methods and results Cardiopulmonary exercise tests at 6 and 12 months after MCS implantation in BTT patients were retrospectively analysed, including clinical factors related to exercise capacity. A total of 105 MCS patients (67% male, 50 ± 12 years) underwent serial CPET at 6 and 12 months after implantation. Power (105 ± 35 to 114 ± 40 W; P ≤ 0.001) and peak VO2 per kilogram (pVO2/kg) improved significantly (16.5 ± 5.0 to 17.2 ± 5.5 mL/kg/min (P = 0.008)). Improvement in pVO2 between 6 and 12 months after LVAD implantation was not related to heart failure aetiology or haemodynamic severity prior to MCS. We identified maximal heart rate at exercise as an important factor for pVO2. Younger age and lower BMI were related to further improvement. At 12 months, 25 (24%) patients had a normal exercise capacity (Weber classification A, pVO2 > 20 mL/kg/min). Conclusions Exercise capacity (power and pVO2) increased significantly between 6 and 12 months after MCS independent of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile or heart failure aetiology. Heart rate at exercise importantly relates to exercise capacity. This long‐term improvement in exercise capacity is important information for the growing group of long‐term MCS patients as this is critical for the quality of life of patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:51:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c72d05de64b4e89904b828598c21a9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:51:51Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-1c72d05de64b4e89904b828598c21a9b2022-12-27T03:53:06ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222021-06-01831796180510.1002/ehf2.13234One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantationSusanne E.A. Felix0Martinus I.F. Oerlemans1Faiz Z. Ramjankhan2Steven A. Muller3Hans H. KirkelsLinda W. vanLaake4Willem J.L. Suyker5Folkert W. Asselbergs6Nicolaas deJonge7Department of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Medical Center of Utrecht Utrecht The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Medical Center of Utrecht Utrecht The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology University Medical Center of Utrecht Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht 3584 CX The NetherlandsAbstract Aims Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) results in substantial improvement of prognosis and functional capacity. Currently, duration of MCS as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) is often prolonged due to shortage of donor hearts. Because long‐term results of exercise capacity after MCS are largely unknown, we studied serial cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) during the first year after MCS implantation. Methods and results Cardiopulmonary exercise tests at 6 and 12 months after MCS implantation in BTT patients were retrospectively analysed, including clinical factors related to exercise capacity. A total of 105 MCS patients (67% male, 50 ± 12 years) underwent serial CPET at 6 and 12 months after implantation. Power (105 ± 35 to 114 ± 40 W; P ≤ 0.001) and peak VO2 per kilogram (pVO2/kg) improved significantly (16.5 ± 5.0 to 17.2 ± 5.5 mL/kg/min (P = 0.008)). Improvement in pVO2 between 6 and 12 months after LVAD implantation was not related to heart failure aetiology or haemodynamic severity prior to MCS. We identified maximal heart rate at exercise as an important factor for pVO2. Younger age and lower BMI were related to further improvement. At 12 months, 25 (24%) patients had a normal exercise capacity (Weber classification A, pVO2 > 20 mL/kg/min). Conclusions Exercise capacity (power and pVO2) increased significantly between 6 and 12 months after MCS independent of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile or heart failure aetiology. Heart rate at exercise importantly relates to exercise capacity. This long‐term improvement in exercise capacity is important information for the growing group of long‐term MCS patients as this is critical for the quality of life of patients.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13234Mechanical circulatory supportQuality of lifeFunctional capacityCardiopulmonary exercise test. VO2
spellingShingle Susanne E.A. Felix
Martinus I.F. Oerlemans
Faiz Z. Ramjankhan
Steven A. Muller
Hans H. Kirkels
Linda W. vanLaake
Willem J.L. Suyker
Folkert W. Asselbergs
Nicolaas deJonge
One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
ESC Heart Failure
Mechanical circulatory support
Quality of life
Functional capacity
Cardiopulmonary exercise test. VO2
title One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
title_full One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
title_fullStr One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
title_full_unstemmed One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
title_short One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
title_sort one year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
topic Mechanical circulatory support
Quality of life
Functional capacity
Cardiopulmonary exercise test. VO2
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13234
work_keys_str_mv AT susanneeafelix oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT martinusifoerlemans oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT faizzramjankhan oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT stevenamuller oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT hanshkirkels oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT lindawvanlaake oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT willemjlsuyker oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT folkertwasselbergs oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation
AT nicolaasdejonge oneyearimprovementofexercisecapacityinpatientswithmechanicalcirculatorysupportasbridgetotransplantation