Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida

Abstract Background In recent years the use of peer specialists in the delivery of mental health of care across the US has increased. Although data on the benefits of using peer specialists is limited and/or equivocal, states are making policy and funding decisions to support the expansion of peer s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Castellanos, Mayte Capo, Diana Valderrama, Melissa Jean-Francois, Aniuska Luna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0239-6
_version_ 1828414630883491840
author Daniel Castellanos
Mayte Capo
Diana Valderrama
Melissa Jean-Francois
Aniuska Luna
author_facet Daniel Castellanos
Mayte Capo
Diana Valderrama
Melissa Jean-Francois
Aniuska Luna
author_sort Daniel Castellanos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In recent years the use of peer specialists in the delivery of mental health of care across the US has increased. Although data on the benefits of using peer specialists is limited and/or equivocal, states are making policy and funding decisions to support the expansion of peer specialist services. This data is even more limited in the state of Florida where no studies were found to document the effect of peer specialists on mental health care outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether local decisions to use peer specialists can be supported through the measurement of outcomes of service utilization and mental health functioning when peer specialists are involved in the treatment of individuals living with serious mental illness. Methods The study was conducted using service data collected by South Florida Behavioral Health Network (SFBHN). SFBHN is the Managing Entity for publicly funded mental health and substance abuse services in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties in Florida. We compared mental health outcomes and service utilization between individuals who received peer specialist services (n = 367) and a treatment as usual group (n = 1468) matched on gender, age and severity of diagnosis in the period July 2013 and June 2015. Multilevel models were used to evaluate the functioning outcomes between the groups. Service utilization was assessed using negative binomial regression. Results Individuals in the treatment group receiving peer specialist services utilized more ambulatory/lower levels of care services and had more frequent crisis stabilization unit admissions. Those in the treatment group also displayed more functional difficulties with a variety of practical activities, employment and housing and violent temper, hostility, threatening behaviors. Conclusions The findings of the study further support existing evidence documenting the mixed benefits of using peer services compared to treatment as usual care. Policy makers and other stakeholders are encouraged to advance mental health recovery by examining outcomes more comprehensively. Future research should include examination of the subjective benefits of peer support for recipients, understanding the impact on service utilization and a better definition of the roles, supervision and expectations of peer support programs.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:29:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c7c4432b63b429e83570c5b4be40909
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-4458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:29:59Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Mental Health Systems
spelling doaj.art-1c7c4432b63b429e83570c5b4be409092022-12-22T01:47:00ZengBMCInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems1752-44582018-10-011211910.1186/s13033-018-0239-6Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South FloridaDaniel Castellanos0Mayte Capo1Diana Valderrama2Melissa Jean-Francois3Aniuska Luna4Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International UniversitySouth Florida Behavioral Health NetworkSouth Florida Behavioral Health NetworkRobert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International UniversityAbstract Background In recent years the use of peer specialists in the delivery of mental health of care across the US has increased. Although data on the benefits of using peer specialists is limited and/or equivocal, states are making policy and funding decisions to support the expansion of peer specialist services. This data is even more limited in the state of Florida where no studies were found to document the effect of peer specialists on mental health care outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether local decisions to use peer specialists can be supported through the measurement of outcomes of service utilization and mental health functioning when peer specialists are involved in the treatment of individuals living with serious mental illness. Methods The study was conducted using service data collected by South Florida Behavioral Health Network (SFBHN). SFBHN is the Managing Entity for publicly funded mental health and substance abuse services in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties in Florida. We compared mental health outcomes and service utilization between individuals who received peer specialist services (n = 367) and a treatment as usual group (n = 1468) matched on gender, age and severity of diagnosis in the period July 2013 and June 2015. Multilevel models were used to evaluate the functioning outcomes between the groups. Service utilization was assessed using negative binomial regression. Results Individuals in the treatment group receiving peer specialist services utilized more ambulatory/lower levels of care services and had more frequent crisis stabilization unit admissions. Those in the treatment group also displayed more functional difficulties with a variety of practical activities, employment and housing and violent temper, hostility, threatening behaviors. Conclusions The findings of the study further support existing evidence documenting the mixed benefits of using peer services compared to treatment as usual care. Policy makers and other stakeholders are encouraged to advance mental health recovery by examining outcomes more comprehensively. Future research should include examination of the subjective benefits of peer support for recipients, understanding the impact on service utilization and a better definition of the roles, supervision and expectations of peer support programs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0239-6Peer specialistsMental healthOutcomes
spellingShingle Daniel Castellanos
Mayte Capo
Diana Valderrama
Melissa Jean-Francois
Aniuska Luna
Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Peer specialists
Mental health
Outcomes
title Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
title_full Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
title_fullStr Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
title_short Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida
title_sort relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in south florida
topic Peer specialists
Mental health
Outcomes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0239-6
work_keys_str_mv AT danielcastellanos relationshipofpeerspecialiststomentalhealthoutcomesinsouthflorida
AT maytecapo relationshipofpeerspecialiststomentalhealthoutcomesinsouthflorida
AT dianavalderrama relationshipofpeerspecialiststomentalhealthoutcomesinsouthflorida
AT melissajeanfrancois relationshipofpeerspecialiststomentalhealthoutcomesinsouthflorida
AT aniuskaluna relationshipofpeerspecialiststomentalhealthoutcomesinsouthflorida