Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial

Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objective This clinical study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive material by comparing it with a resin composite (RC) in the restoration of Class II cavities over a year. Methodology A hundred Class II cavities were restored at 31 participants. Gro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Fatma Dilsad OZ, Ece MERAL, Sevil GURGAN
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	University of São Paulo 2023-06-01
Series:	Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:	Composite resins Permanent dental restoration Randomized controlled trial
Online Access:	http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572023000100429&tlng=en

Similar Items

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
by: Fatma Dilsad Oz, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations
by: Flavia Bittencourt Pazinatto, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)

Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of esthetic composite resins
by: Ceren Özge Biçer, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Mechanical Behavior of Alkasite Posterior Restorations in Comparison to Polymeric Materials: A 3D-FEA Study
by: Pietro Ausiello, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Microleakage of Class II Combined Amalgam-Composite Restorations Using Different Composites and Bonding Agents
by: F. Sharafeddin, et al.
Published: (2008-09-01)

A Randomised Clinical Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Compomer and Composite Materials in Class II Primary Molar Restorations: 24-Month Results
by: Esra Oz, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up
by: Rafael MENEZES-SILVA, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Six month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial
by: Patricio Vildósola, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Three-year follow-up of flowable bulk-fill resin restorations in posterior teeth: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
by: Matheus Kury, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

AWARENESS REGARDING USE OF LINING UNDER POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS AMONG GENERAL DENTISTS OF LAHORE
by: Salman Ashraf Khan, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Influence of Vestibular Bevel on the Success of Traumatized Teeth Restorations: Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial - Preliminary Results with 6-Months Follow-Up
by: Marcela Baraúna Magno, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
by: Fábio Herrmann Coelho-De-Souza, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01)

Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities
by: Elham Zajkani, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial
by: Marcos de Oliveira BARCELEIRO, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Clinical Outcome of Class I and II Restorations with and without an Intermediary Layer of a Flowable Composite after 24 Months: A Prospective, Randomized, Split-Mouth-Designed, Controlled and Single-Blinded Clinical Trial
by: Christian Ralf Gernhardt, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Clinical follow-up at 18 months of two Bulk Fill occlusal composite resins. A double-blind randomized clinical study.
by: Patricio Vildósola Grez, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Effect of Saliva Contamination on Microleakage of Open Sandwich Restorations
by: Çiğdem Çelik, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Water sorption, solubility and surface roughness of resin surface sealants
by: Jaqueline Biazuz, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

Clinical evaluation of universal adhesives used with different application modes on the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: preliminary findings of a 12-month randomized, controlled clinical trial
by: Fatma Dilşad Öz, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Assessment of a conservative approach for restoration of extensively destroyed posterior teeth
by: José MONDELLI, et al.

A Descriptive Study of Alkasite, Bulk Fill, and Fiber-Reinforced Restoration Bioactivities
by: Shaymaa A. AL Dabbagh, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Restorations with Bulk Fill restorative system: case report
by: Mirella Aline Batista da COSTA, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Influence of silane content and filler distribution on chemical-mechanical properties of resin composites
by: Tathy Aparecida XAVIER, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
by: Fatma Dilsad OZ, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Evaluation of hardness and wear resistance of interim restorative materials
by: Omid Savabi, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Recomendaciones para el empleo práctico de resinas compuestas en restauraciones estéticas
by: Alain Manuel Chaple Gil, et al.

Assessment of prevalence and causative factors for replacement of composite and amalgam restorations: An observational study
by: Rahaf Naseer Alhoshani, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer
by: Fariba Motevasselian, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Effect of the ceramic translucency on the long-term water sorption and solubility of resin cements
by: Ana Paula Menezes Vaz Queiroz, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Effect of Various Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on the Microhardness of Bulkfill Restorative Composite Resin used as a Pre-endodontic Restoration
by: Anuradha Patil, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Influence of dental bleaching on marginal leakage of Class V restorations
by: Andréia Cristina Ramos Dorini, et al.
Published: (2010-04-01)

Survival time of direct dental restorations in adults
by: Thaís Torres Barros Dutra, et al.

Microleakage evaluation of photopolymerization efficiency in different layering methods of new generation LED light devices
by: Yücel Merve, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Background and surrounding colors affect the color blending of a single-shade composite
by: Mariana Silva BARROS, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Atraumatic restorative treatment in atypical cavities
by: Letícia Simino Carvalho, et al.
Published: (2009-10-01)

Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin and layered composite resin restoration in class I cavity of permanent molar teeth
by: Mohammad Fida Hasan Talukder, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Cost-effectiveness of selective caries removal versus stepwise excavation for deep caries lesions
by: Juliana Jobim Jardim, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Clinical Evaluation of Composite Restorations with and without Polyethylene Fiber in First Permanent Molars: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Trial
by: Semanur Özüdoğru, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Clinical performance of some resin-based materials in restoring non-carious cervical lesions
by: Diana Onet, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Microbial microleakage assessment of class V cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study
by: Hossein Nematollahi, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)