Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases

Abstract Background Hip fractures are common in elderly populations and can be life threatening. Changes in healthcare delivery and outcomes for patients with hip fracture treated with intramedullary nails are not well characterized. The objectives of our study were: 1) the characterization of patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher G. Finkemeier, Chantal E. Holy, Jill W. Ruppenkamp, Mollie Vanderkarr, C. Sparks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05772-1
_version_ 1798004283463958528
author Christopher G. Finkemeier
Chantal E. Holy
Jill W. Ruppenkamp
Mollie Vanderkarr
C. Sparks
author_facet Christopher G. Finkemeier
Chantal E. Holy
Jill W. Ruppenkamp
Mollie Vanderkarr
C. Sparks
author_sort Christopher G. Finkemeier
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Hip fractures are common in elderly populations and can be life threatening. Changes in healthcare delivery and outcomes for patients with hip fracture treated with intramedullary nails are not well characterized. The objectives of our study were: 1) the characterization of patients treated with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail -Advanced™(TFNA) Proximal Femoral Nailing System or comparable nails (index) and estimate 12-month all-cause readmissions (ACR) and reoperations following index; and 2) the evaluation of 10-year healthcare utilization (HCU) trends for treatment of femoral fractures with femoral nails. Methods This is a retrospective database analysis using the Premier hospital database. All adults with femoral fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, from 2010 to Q3 2019, in the inpatient setting, were identified. Exclusion criteria included patients with bilateral hip surgery and presence of breakage at time of initial surgery. The primary outcome was ACR and reoperation, the secondary outcomes were healthcare utilization metrics. Variables included demographics, comorbidities (Elixhauser Index (EI)), surgical intervention variables and hospital characteristics. Results Forty-one thousand one hundred four patients were included in the study, of which 14,069 TFNA patients, with average age 77.9 (Standard deviation (SD): 12.0), more than 60% with 3 or more comorbidities (more than 64% for TFNA), 40% with severe or extreme disease severity and one third with severe or extreme risk for mortality. ACR reached 60.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.6%-60.5%) – for TFNA: 60.0% (95%CI: 59.2%-60.8%). The reoperation rate was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.8%-4.2%) – for TFNA: 3.8% (95%CI: 3.5%-4.1%). Length of stay (LOS) averaged 5.8 days (SD: 4.8), and 12-month hip reoperation was 4.0% (3.8%-4.2%), in TFNA cohort: 3.8% (3.5%-4.1%). From 2010 to 2019: the percentage patients operated within 48 h of admission significantly increased, from 75.2% (95%CI: 74.3%-76.1%) to 84.3% (95%CI: 83.9%-84.6%); LOS significantly decreased, from 6.2 (95%CI: 6.0–6.4) to 5.6 (95%CI: 5.5–5.7) days; discharge to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) increased from 56.0% (95%CI: 54.8%-57.2%) to 61.5% (95%CI: 60.8%-62.2%); ACR rates decreased but reoperation rates remained constant. Conclusions ACR and reoperation rates were similar across device types and averaged 60.1% and 4.0%, respectively. Ten-year analyses showed reductions in hospital HCU and greater reliance on SNF.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:21:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1c88fa54d82c49f0b08554aecc976fda
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:21:10Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-1c88fa54d82c49f0b08554aecc976fda2022-12-22T04:24:05ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742022-09-012311910.1186/s12891-022-05772-1Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 CasesChristopher G. Finkemeier0Chantal E. Holy1Jill W. Ruppenkamp2Mollie Vanderkarr3C. Sparks4Sutter HealthMedTech Epidemiology, Johnson & JohnsonMedTech Epidemiology, Johnson & JohnsonDePuy SynthesDePuy SynthesAbstract Background Hip fractures are common in elderly populations and can be life threatening. Changes in healthcare delivery and outcomes for patients with hip fracture treated with intramedullary nails are not well characterized. The objectives of our study were: 1) the characterization of patients treated with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail -Advanced™(TFNA) Proximal Femoral Nailing System or comparable nails (index) and estimate 12-month all-cause readmissions (ACR) and reoperations following index; and 2) the evaluation of 10-year healthcare utilization (HCU) trends for treatment of femoral fractures with femoral nails. Methods This is a retrospective database analysis using the Premier hospital database. All adults with femoral fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, from 2010 to Q3 2019, in the inpatient setting, were identified. Exclusion criteria included patients with bilateral hip surgery and presence of breakage at time of initial surgery. The primary outcome was ACR and reoperation, the secondary outcomes were healthcare utilization metrics. Variables included demographics, comorbidities (Elixhauser Index (EI)), surgical intervention variables and hospital characteristics. Results Forty-one thousand one hundred four patients were included in the study, of which 14,069 TFNA patients, with average age 77.9 (Standard deviation (SD): 12.0), more than 60% with 3 or more comorbidities (more than 64% for TFNA), 40% with severe or extreme disease severity and one third with severe or extreme risk for mortality. ACR reached 60.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.6%-60.5%) – for TFNA: 60.0% (95%CI: 59.2%-60.8%). The reoperation rate was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.8%-4.2%) – for TFNA: 3.8% (95%CI: 3.5%-4.1%). Length of stay (LOS) averaged 5.8 days (SD: 4.8), and 12-month hip reoperation was 4.0% (3.8%-4.2%), in TFNA cohort: 3.8% (3.5%-4.1%). From 2010 to 2019: the percentage patients operated within 48 h of admission significantly increased, from 75.2% (95%CI: 74.3%-76.1%) to 84.3% (95%CI: 83.9%-84.6%); LOS significantly decreased, from 6.2 (95%CI: 6.0–6.4) to 5.6 (95%CI: 5.5–5.7) days; discharge to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) increased from 56.0% (95%CI: 54.8%-57.2%) to 61.5% (95%CI: 60.8%-62.2%); ACR rates decreased but reoperation rates remained constant. Conclusions ACR and reoperation rates were similar across device types and averaged 60.1% and 4.0%, respectively. Ten-year analyses showed reductions in hospital HCU and greater reliance on SNF.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05772-1Fracture fixationIntramedullaryRetrospective studiesLength of stayPatient dischargeReoperation
spellingShingle Christopher G. Finkemeier
Chantal E. Holy
Jill W. Ruppenkamp
Mollie Vanderkarr
C. Sparks
Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Fracture fixation
Intramedullary
Retrospective studies
Length of stay
Patient discharge
Reoperation
title Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
title_full Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
title_fullStr Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
title_short Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails – a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases
title_sort demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails a 10 year analysis of more than 40 000 cases
topic Fracture fixation
Intramedullary
Retrospective studies
Length of stay
Patient discharge
Reoperation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05772-1
work_keys_str_mv AT christophergfinkemeier demographicandclinicalprofileofpatientstreatedwithproximalfemoralnailsa10yearanalysisofmorethan40000cases
AT chantaleholy demographicandclinicalprofileofpatientstreatedwithproximalfemoralnailsa10yearanalysisofmorethan40000cases
AT jillwruppenkamp demographicandclinicalprofileofpatientstreatedwithproximalfemoralnailsa10yearanalysisofmorethan40000cases
AT mollievanderkarr demographicandclinicalprofileofpatientstreatedwithproximalfemoralnailsa10yearanalysisofmorethan40000cases
AT csparks demographicandclinicalprofileofpatientstreatedwithproximalfemoralnailsa10yearanalysisofmorethan40000cases