Total lumbar disc arthroplasty
Objective. To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of M6-L artificial disc in lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Material and Methods. A total of 109 patients with diagnosed lumbar DDD and spinal stenosis were operated on after 6 months of unsuc- cessful conservative treatment in 2011–2015....
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"
2016-03-01
|
| Series: | Хирургия позвоночника |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/259/1229 |
| _version_ | 1797723740530802688 |
|---|---|
| author | Medetbek D. Abakirov Ivan A. Kruglov Rinat R. Abdrakhmanov Aleksandr S. Seleznev Aleksandr E. Mader |
| author_facet | Medetbek D. Abakirov Ivan A. Kruglov Rinat R. Abdrakhmanov Aleksandr S. Seleznev Aleksandr E. Mader |
| author_sort | Medetbek D. Abakirov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of M6-L artificial disc in lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Material and Methods. A total of 109 patients with diagnosed lumbar DDD and spinal stenosis were operated on after 6 months of unsuc-
cessful conservative treatment in 2011–2015. All patients underwent M6-L artificial lumbar disc implantation. Average follow-up period
was 1.5 years (range: 4 months to 6 years). Patient satisfaction after treatment, regression of pain score, increase in activities of daily liv-
ing, as well as radiographic parameters (recovery of intervertebral space height, mobility in the operated segment), and frequency of com-
plications, reoperations and revision surgeries were evaluated.
Results. Good and excellent clinical outcomes were revealed in most of patients. The average VAS score of back and leg pain regression
was 27 mm, improvement in daily activity – 24.3 points on ODI, increase in the disc space height – 7.6 mm, and mobility in the operated
segment – 8.5°. Serious complications were not detected, spontaneous fusion at the operated level was noted in 2.0 % of cases, revision
surgery due to implant migration (implant removal and ALIF with cage) was required in 0.9 % of cases.
Conclusion. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty with M6-L is a safe and highly effective procedure that maintains mobility in the operated
segment and prevents adjacent disc degeneration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:06:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1ca06407c4344805b665d5cdf7901244 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1810-8997 2313-1497 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:06:04Z |
| publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Хирургия позвоночника |
| spelling | doaj.art-1ca06407c4344805b665d5cdf79012442023-09-02T11:11:34ZengMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"Хирургия позвоночника1810-89972313-14972016-03-01131596610.14531/ss2016.1.59-66Total lumbar disc arthroplastyMedetbek D. Abakirov0Ivan A. Kruglov1Rinat R. Abdrakhmanov2Aleksandr S. Seleznev3Aleksandr E. Mader4Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RussiaDistrict Military Hospital, Moscow, RussiaPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RussiaDistrict Military Hospital, Moscow, RussiaPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RussiaObjective. To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of M6-L artificial disc in lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Material and Methods. A total of 109 patients with diagnosed lumbar DDD and spinal stenosis were operated on after 6 months of unsuc- cessful conservative treatment in 2011–2015. All patients underwent M6-L artificial lumbar disc implantation. Average follow-up period was 1.5 years (range: 4 months to 6 years). Patient satisfaction after treatment, regression of pain score, increase in activities of daily liv- ing, as well as radiographic parameters (recovery of intervertebral space height, mobility in the operated segment), and frequency of com- plications, reoperations and revision surgeries were evaluated. Results. Good and excellent clinical outcomes were revealed in most of patients. The average VAS score of back and leg pain regression was 27 mm, improvement in daily activity – 24.3 points on ODI, increase in the disc space height – 7.6 mm, and mobility in the operated segment – 8.5°. Serious complications were not detected, spontaneous fusion at the operated level was noted in 2.0 % of cases, revision surgery due to implant migration (implant removal and ALIF with cage) was required in 0.9 % of cases. Conclusion. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty with M6-L is a safe and highly effective procedure that maintains mobility in the operated segment and prevents adjacent disc degeneration.https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/259/1229disc herniationм6-l implantdegenerative disease of the spinelumbar spine |
| spellingShingle | Medetbek D. Abakirov Ivan A. Kruglov Rinat R. Abdrakhmanov Aleksandr S. Seleznev Aleksandr E. Mader Total lumbar disc arthroplasty Хирургия позвоночника disc herniation м6-l implant degenerative disease of the spine lumbar spine |
| title | Total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| title_full | Total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| title_fullStr | Total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| title_full_unstemmed | Total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| title_short | Total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| title_sort | total lumbar disc arthroplasty |
| topic | disc herniation м6-l implant degenerative disease of the spine lumbar spine |
| url | https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/259/1229 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT medetbekdabakirov totallumbardiscarthroplasty AT ivanakruglov totallumbardiscarthroplasty AT rinatrabdrakhmanov totallumbardiscarthroplasty AT aleksandrsseleznev totallumbardiscarthroplasty AT aleksandremader totallumbardiscarthroplasty |