Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele

Summary: Background: Rectocele is often associated with chronic constipation. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair rectoceles, but the results vary. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of transanal repair (TAR) and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy (TAR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joo Hyung Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Yong Pyo Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958419301289
_version_ 1818251985639440384
author Joo Hyung Kim
Dae Hyun Kim
Yong Pyo Lee
author_facet Joo Hyung Kim
Dae Hyun Kim
Yong Pyo Lee
author_sort Joo Hyung Kim
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Rectocele is often associated with chronic constipation. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair rectoceles, but the results vary. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of transanal repair (TAR) and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy (TAR + PC). Methods: While 44 patients underwent TAR, 49 patients underwent TAR + PC for surgical repair of rectocele. Patients were followed up 3 months post-surgery for anorectal physiological changes. From the entire cohort of patients who underwent the surgical repair, 22 patients who underwent TAR and 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC agreed to participate in the 3-year post-treatment check-up. Results: Out of the 22 patients who underwent TAR, 3 patients (13.6%) scored more than 15 on the constipation scoring system (CSS), while 1 out of 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC scored more than 15 on the CSS 3 months post-treatment, which is considered as recurrence (p = 0.237). With 7 patients from the TAR group (31.8%) and 2 patients from the TAR + PC group (8.0%) showing recurrence of rectocele at 3-year post-treatment follow-up, this study found that TAR + PC had a much lower rate of recurrence than TAR. Furthermore, TAR + PC was found to be more effective than TAR in terms of rectal sensation, sensory threshold (p = 0.001), and early defecation urge (p = 0.003). Conclusions: TAR + PC can help alleviate some symptoms by restoring the rectal sensation and improving the rectovaginal septum. It can be inferred that the addition of a simple treatment method can lead to a lower rate of recurrence. Keywords: Posterior colporrhaphy, Rectocele, Transanal rectocele repair
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:16:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cb36a94947441f1856f320676b6f321
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1015-9584
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:16:59Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Surgery
spelling doaj.art-1cb36a94947441f1856f320676b6f3212022-12-22T00:19:04ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842020-01-01431265271Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectoceleJoo Hyung Kim0Dae Hyun Kim1Yong Pyo Lee2Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea; Corresponding author. 164 Worldcup-ro, Youngtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499 Republic of Korea. Fax: +82 31 219 5755.Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Surgery, Hanvit Hospital, Suwon, Republic of KoreaSummary: Background: Rectocele is often associated with chronic constipation. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair rectoceles, but the results vary. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of transanal repair (TAR) and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy (TAR + PC). Methods: While 44 patients underwent TAR, 49 patients underwent TAR + PC for surgical repair of rectocele. Patients were followed up 3 months post-surgery for anorectal physiological changes. From the entire cohort of patients who underwent the surgical repair, 22 patients who underwent TAR and 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC agreed to participate in the 3-year post-treatment check-up. Results: Out of the 22 patients who underwent TAR, 3 patients (13.6%) scored more than 15 on the constipation scoring system (CSS), while 1 out of 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC scored more than 15 on the CSS 3 months post-treatment, which is considered as recurrence (p = 0.237). With 7 patients from the TAR group (31.8%) and 2 patients from the TAR + PC group (8.0%) showing recurrence of rectocele at 3-year post-treatment follow-up, this study found that TAR + PC had a much lower rate of recurrence than TAR. Furthermore, TAR + PC was found to be more effective than TAR in terms of rectal sensation, sensory threshold (p = 0.001), and early defecation urge (p = 0.003). Conclusions: TAR + PC can help alleviate some symptoms by restoring the rectal sensation and improving the rectovaginal septum. It can be inferred that the addition of a simple treatment method can lead to a lower rate of recurrence. Keywords: Posterior colporrhaphy, Rectocele, Transanal rectocele repairhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958419301289
spellingShingle Joo Hyung Kim
Dae Hyun Kim
Yong Pyo Lee
Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
Asian Journal of Surgery
title Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
title_full Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
title_fullStr Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
title_full_unstemmed Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
title_short Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
title_sort long term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958419301289
work_keys_str_mv AT joohyungkim longtermcomparisonofphysiologicanorectalchangesandrecurrencebetweentransanalrepairandtransanalrepairwithposteriorcolporrhaphyinrectocele
AT daehyunkim longtermcomparisonofphysiologicanorectalchangesandrecurrencebetweentransanalrepairandtransanalrepairwithposteriorcolporrhaphyinrectocele
AT yongpyolee longtermcomparisonofphysiologicanorectalchangesandrecurrencebetweentransanalrepairandtransanalrepairwithposteriorcolporrhaphyinrectocele