Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis
Abstract Background This study investigated if the evidence on the success of the Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes in healthcare is changing as the schemes continue to evolve by updating a previous systematic review. Methods A meta-regression analysis using 116 studies evaluating P4P schemes publis...
Main Authors: | Arezou Zaresani, Anthony Scott |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06118-8 |
Similar Items
-
Paying for improvements in quality: recent experience in the NHS in England
by: Rachel Meacock, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
Financial reporting fraud and CEO pay-performance incentives
by: Dong Chen, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
How are pay-for-performance schemes in healthcare designed in low- and middle-income countries? Typology and systematic literature review
by: Roxanne J. Kovacs, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Willingness-to-Pay for Produce: A Meta-Regression Analysis Comparing the Stated Preferences of Producers and Consumers
by: Alice Kilduff, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Long-Term Effects of Financial Incentives for General Practitioners on Quality Indicators in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care—A Follow-Up Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial
by: Rahel Meier, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)