Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Asian Journal of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213 |
_version_ | 1797367875354230784 |
---|---|
author | Chandra Bhushan Tripathi Puja Kumari Jha Rachna Agarwal |
author_facet | Chandra Bhushan Tripathi Puja Kumari Jha Rachna Agarwal |
author_sort | Chandra Bhushan Tripathi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measurement system/method with an established/referral method is required to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old method or use the two interchangeably. Most commonly Pearson’s product-moment correlation is used to ascertain whether two methods agree sufficiently so that the old method can be replaced by a new method. However, it is the most inappropriate method with number of limitations. In this paper, other methods are discussed with their merits and demerits with examples. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:23:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1cbc08333eb54d3cb94b31a200c77cbf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2467-9100 2091-0576 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:23:24Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara |
record_format | Article |
series | Asian Journal of Medical Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-1cbc08333eb54d3cb94b31a200c77cbf2024-01-03T00:50:25ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762024-01-01151262268https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.58213Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?Chandra Bhushan Tripathi 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1092-0620Puja Kumari Jha 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-9897Rachna Agarwal 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-9809Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India Professor, Department of Neurochemistry, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measurement system/method with an established/referral method is required to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old method or use the two interchangeably. Most commonly Pearson’s product-moment correlation is used to ascertain whether two methods agree sufficiently so that the old method can be replaced by a new method. However, it is the most inappropriate method with number of limitations. In this paper, other methods are discussed with their merits and demerits with examples.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit |
spellingShingle | Chandra Bhushan Tripathi Puja Kumari Jha Rachna Agarwal Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? Asian Journal of Medical Sciences method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit |
title | Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? |
title_full | Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? |
title_fullStr | Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? |
title_full_unstemmed | Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? |
title_short | Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? |
title_sort | method comparison statistical measurement correlation or agreement most appropriate tool |
topic | method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit |
url | https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandrabhushantripathi methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool AT pujakumarijha methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool AT rachnaagarwal methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool |