Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?

In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chandra Bhushan Tripathi, Puja Kumari Jha, Rachna Agarwal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2024-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213
_version_ 1797367875354230784
author Chandra Bhushan Tripathi
Puja Kumari Jha
Rachna Agarwal
author_facet Chandra Bhushan Tripathi
Puja Kumari Jha
Rachna Agarwal
author_sort Chandra Bhushan Tripathi
collection DOAJ
description In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measurement system/method with an established/referral method is required to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old method or use the two interchangeably. Most commonly Pearson’s product-moment correlation is used to ascertain whether two methods agree sufficiently so that the old method can be replaced by a new method. However, it is the most inappropriate method with number of limitations. In this paper, other methods are discussed with their merits and demerits with examples.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:23:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cbc08333eb54d3cb94b31a200c77cbf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:23:24Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1cbc08333eb54d3cb94b31a200c77cbf2024-01-03T00:50:25ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762024-01-01151262268https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.58213Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?Chandra Bhushan Tripathi 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1092-0620Puja Kumari Jha 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-9897Rachna Agarwal 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-9809Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India Professor, Department of Neurochemistry, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measurement system/method with an established/referral method is required to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old method or use the two interchangeably. Most commonly Pearson’s product-moment correlation is used to ascertain whether two methods agree sufficiently so that the old method can be replaced by a new method. However, it is the most inappropriate method with number of limitations. In this paper, other methods are discussed with their merits and demerits with examples.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit
spellingShingle Chandra Bhushan Tripathi
Puja Kumari Jha
Rachna Agarwal
Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit
title Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
title_full Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
title_fullStr Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
title_full_unstemmed Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
title_short Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?
title_sort method comparison statistical measurement correlation or agreement most appropriate tool
topic method comparison; pearson’s product-moment correlation; bland–altman method; intra class correlation coefficient; clinical tolerance limit
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/58213
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrabhushantripathi methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool
AT pujakumarijha methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool
AT rachnaagarwal methodcomparisonstatisticalmeasurementcorrelationoragreementmostappropriatetool