The Quality of Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation in Predatory Dental Journals Was Lower Than in Non-Predatory Journals
Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliable scientific journals. The aim of this study was to compare whether the quality of statistical reporting and data presentation differs among articles published in ‘predatory dental journals’ and in other denta...
Main Authors: | Pentti Nieminen, Sergio E. Uribe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/4/468 |
Similar Items
-
THE EFFECTS OF PREDATORY JOURNALS ON QUALITY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
by: Hasanian Ghazi
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Ten Points for High-Quality Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation
by: Pentti Nieminen
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Predatory journals as threats to the academic publishing: a review
by: Jiban Shrestha
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Disseminating biomedical research: Predatory journals and practices
by: Hassan Khan, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Avoiding publishing in predatory journals: An evaluation algorithm
by: Albana Berisha Qehaja
Published: (2020-09-01)