Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.

Small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) may be useful for conducting high-precision, low-disturbance waterbird surveys, but limited data exist on their effectiveness. We evaluated the capacity of a small UAS to census a large (>6,000 nests) coastal Common tern (Sterna hirundo) colony of which groun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dominique Chabot, Shawn R Craik, David M Bird
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122588
_version_ 1818584351770673152
author Dominique Chabot
Shawn R Craik
David M Bird
author_facet Dominique Chabot
Shawn R Craik
David M Bird
author_sort Dominique Chabot
collection DOAJ
description Small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) may be useful for conducting high-precision, low-disturbance waterbird surveys, but limited data exist on their effectiveness. We evaluated the capacity of a small UAS to census a large (>6,000 nests) coastal Common tern (Sterna hirundo) colony of which ground surveys are particularly disruptive and time-consuming. We compared aerial photographic tern counts to ground nest counts in 45 plots (5-m radius) throughout the colony at three intervals over a nine-day period in order to identify sources of variation and establish a coefficient to estimate nest numbers from UAS surveys. We also compared a full colony ground count to full counts from two UAS surveys conducted the following day. Finally, we compared colony disturbance levels over the course of UAS flights to matched control periods. Linear regressions between aerial and ground counts in plots had very strong correlations in all three comparison periods (R2 = 0.972-0.989, P < 0.001) and regression coefficients ranged from 0.928-0.977 terns/nest. Full colony aerial counts were 93.6% and 94.0%, respectively, of the ground count. Varying visibility of terns with ground cover, weather conditions and image quality, and changing nest attendance rates throughout incubation were likely sources of variation in aerial detection rates. Optimally timed UAS surveys of Common tern colonies following our method should yield population estimates in the 93-96% range of ground counts. Although the terns were initially disturbed by the UAS flying overhead, they rapidly habituated to it. Overall, we found no evidence of sustained disturbance to the colony by the UAS. We encourage colonial waterbird researchers and managers to consider taking advantage of this burgeoning technology.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:19:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cc358d275ee4c24b7c42396e24379c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:19:48Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1cc358d275ee4c24b7c42396e24379c02022-12-21T22:38:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012258810.1371/journal.pone.0122588Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.Dominique ChabotShawn R CraikDavid M BirdSmall unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) may be useful for conducting high-precision, low-disturbance waterbird surveys, but limited data exist on their effectiveness. We evaluated the capacity of a small UAS to census a large (>6,000 nests) coastal Common tern (Sterna hirundo) colony of which ground surveys are particularly disruptive and time-consuming. We compared aerial photographic tern counts to ground nest counts in 45 plots (5-m radius) throughout the colony at three intervals over a nine-day period in order to identify sources of variation and establish a coefficient to estimate nest numbers from UAS surveys. We also compared a full colony ground count to full counts from two UAS surveys conducted the following day. Finally, we compared colony disturbance levels over the course of UAS flights to matched control periods. Linear regressions between aerial and ground counts in plots had very strong correlations in all three comparison periods (R2 = 0.972-0.989, P < 0.001) and regression coefficients ranged from 0.928-0.977 terns/nest. Full colony aerial counts were 93.6% and 94.0%, respectively, of the ground count. Varying visibility of terns with ground cover, weather conditions and image quality, and changing nest attendance rates throughout incubation were likely sources of variation in aerial detection rates. Optimally timed UAS surveys of Common tern colonies following our method should yield population estimates in the 93-96% range of ground counts. Although the terns were initially disturbed by the UAS flying overhead, they rapidly habituated to it. Overall, we found no evidence of sustained disturbance to the colony by the UAS. We encourage colonial waterbird researchers and managers to consider taking advantage of this burgeoning technology.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122588
spellingShingle Dominique Chabot
Shawn R Craik
David M Bird
Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
PLoS ONE
title Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
title_full Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
title_fullStr Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
title_full_unstemmed Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
title_short Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft.
title_sort population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122588
work_keys_str_mv AT dominiquechabot populationcensusofalargecommonterncolonywithasmallunmannedaircraft
AT shawnrcraik populationcensusofalargecommonterncolonywithasmallunmannedaircraft
AT davidmbird populationcensusofalargecommonterncolonywithasmallunmannedaircraft