Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes’ rule in elementary situations
This paper has two aims. First, we investigate how often people make choices conforming to Bayes’ rule when natural sampling is applied. Second, we show that using Bayes’ rule is not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes’ rule. Simpler methods, even fallacious heuristics, might prescribe correc...
Main Authors: | Artur eDomurat, Olga eKowalczuk, Katarzyna eIdzikowska, Zuzanna eBorzymowska, Marta eNowak-Przygodzka |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01194/full |
Similar Items
-
From Bayes-optimal to heuristic decision-making in a two-alternative forced choice task with an information-theoretic bounded rationality model
by: Cecilia Lindig-León, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Optimal interference range for minimum Bayes risk in binomial and Poisson wireless networks
by: Min Ouyang, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
The recognition heuristic: A decade of research
by: Gerd Gigerenzer, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Retesting the institutional memory hypothesis: An experimental study
by: Burakov Dmitry
Published: (2018-01-01) -
BFpack: Flexible Bayes Factor Testing of Scientific Theories in R
by: Joris Mulder, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)