A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column

<p>A common task in oceanography is to model the vertical movement of particles such as microplastics, nanoparticles, mineral particles, gas bubbles, oil droplets, fish eggs, plankton, or algae. In some cases, the distribution of the vertical rise or settling velocities of the particles in que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Nordam, R. Kristiansen, R. Nepstad, E. van Sebille, A. M. Booth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-09-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/5339/2023/gmd-16-5339-2023.pdf
_version_ 1797681427063504896
author T. Nordam
T. Nordam
R. Kristiansen
R. Nepstad
E. van Sebille
A. M. Booth
author_facet T. Nordam
T. Nordam
R. Kristiansen
R. Nepstad
E. van Sebille
A. M. Booth
author_sort T. Nordam
collection DOAJ
description <p>A common task in oceanography is to model the vertical movement of particles such as microplastics, nanoparticles, mineral particles, gas bubbles, oil droplets, fish eggs, plankton, or algae. In some cases, the distribution of the vertical rise or settling velocities of the particles in question can span a wide range, covering several orders of magnitude, often due to a broad particle size distribution or differences in density. This requires numerical methods that are able to adequately resolve a wide and possibly multi-modal velocity distribution.</p> <p>Lagrangian particle methods are commonly used for these applications. A strength of such methods is that each particle can have its own rise or settling speed, which makes it easy to achieve a good representation of a continuous distribution of speeds. An alternative approach is to use Eulerian methods, where the partial differential equations describing the transport problem are solved directly with numerical methods. In Eulerian methods, different rise or settling speeds must be represented as discrete classes, and in practice, only a limited number of classes can be included.</p> <p>Here, we consider three different examples of applications for a water column model: positively buoyant fish eggs, a mixture of positively and negatively buoyant microplastics, and positively buoyant oil droplets being entrained by waves. For each of the three cases, we formulate a model for the vertical transport based on the advection–diffusion equation with suitable boundary conditions and, in one case, a reaction term. We give a detailed description of an Eulerian and a Lagrangian implementation of these models, and we demonstrate that they give equivalent results for selected example cases. We also pay special attention to the convergence of the model results with an increasing number of classes in the Eulerian scheme and with the number of particles in the Lagrangian scheme. For the Lagrangian scheme, we see the <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn><mo>/</mo><msqrt><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></msqrt></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="39pt" height="22pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="d9ca94831737cc2bfbb9f2192576cbc2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00001.svg" width="39pt" height="22pt" src="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> convergence, as expected for a Monte Carlo method, while for the Eulerian implementation, we see a second-order (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn><mo>/</mo><msubsup><mi>N</mi><mi>k</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="28pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="65ed4bae386134bc32043ea4a232773e"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00002.svg" width="28pt" height="16pt" src="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg></span></span>) convergence with the number of classes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:44:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cd1e18ada9645249604026ccf8a2001
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:44:40Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-1cd1e18ada9645249604026ccf8a20012023-09-19T09:55:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032023-09-01165339536310.5194/gmd-16-5339-2023A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water columnT. Nordam0T. Nordam1R. Kristiansen2R. Nepstad3E. van Sebille4A. M. Booth5SINTEF Ocean AS, Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwaySINTEF Ocean AS, Trondheim, NorwayInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the NetherlandsSINTEF Ocean AS, Trondheim, Norway<p>A common task in oceanography is to model the vertical movement of particles such as microplastics, nanoparticles, mineral particles, gas bubbles, oil droplets, fish eggs, plankton, or algae. In some cases, the distribution of the vertical rise or settling velocities of the particles in question can span a wide range, covering several orders of magnitude, often due to a broad particle size distribution or differences in density. This requires numerical methods that are able to adequately resolve a wide and possibly multi-modal velocity distribution.</p> <p>Lagrangian particle methods are commonly used for these applications. A strength of such methods is that each particle can have its own rise or settling speed, which makes it easy to achieve a good representation of a continuous distribution of speeds. An alternative approach is to use Eulerian methods, where the partial differential equations describing the transport problem are solved directly with numerical methods. In Eulerian methods, different rise or settling speeds must be represented as discrete classes, and in practice, only a limited number of classes can be included.</p> <p>Here, we consider three different examples of applications for a water column model: positively buoyant fish eggs, a mixture of positively and negatively buoyant microplastics, and positively buoyant oil droplets being entrained by waves. For each of the three cases, we formulate a model for the vertical transport based on the advection–diffusion equation with suitable boundary conditions and, in one case, a reaction term. We give a detailed description of an Eulerian and a Lagrangian implementation of these models, and we demonstrate that they give equivalent results for selected example cases. We also pay special attention to the convergence of the model results with an increasing number of classes in the Eulerian scheme and with the number of particles in the Lagrangian scheme. For the Lagrangian scheme, we see the <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn><mo>/</mo><msqrt><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></msqrt></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="39pt" height="22pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="d9ca94831737cc2bfbb9f2192576cbc2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00001.svg" width="39pt" height="22pt" src="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> convergence, as expected for a Monte Carlo method, while for the Eulerian implementation, we see a second-order (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn><mo>/</mo><msubsup><mi>N</mi><mi>k</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="28pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="65ed4bae386134bc32043ea4a232773e"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00002.svg" width="28pt" height="16pt" src="gmd-16-5339-2023-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg></span></span>) convergence with the number of classes.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/5339/2023/gmd-16-5339-2023.pdf
spellingShingle T. Nordam
T. Nordam
R. Kristiansen
R. Nepstad
E. van Sebille
A. M. Booth
A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
Geoscientific Model Development
title A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
title_full A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
title_fullStr A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
title_short A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
title_sort comparison of eulerian and lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/5339/2023/gmd-16-5339-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tnordam acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT tnordam acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT rkristiansen acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT rnepstad acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT evansebille acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT ambooth acomparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT tnordam comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT tnordam comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT rkristiansen comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT rnepstad comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT evansebille comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn
AT ambooth comparisonofeulerianandlagrangianmethodsforverticalparticletransportinthewatercolumn