Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review

Additive manufacturing (AM) is the owner of a huge potential as a manufacturing technology in fabricating functional implants, and scaffolds for biomedical applications. AM, which includes 3D printing (3DP) and 3D bioprinting, can be the solution to produce several needs such as scaffolds/implants,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evlen Hatice, Ziyamukhamedova Umida, Juraev Dilmurod, Abdukarimov Mirzohid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/38/e3sconf_conmechydro23_03040.pdf
_version_ 1797775880854962176
author Evlen Hatice
Ziyamukhamedova Umida
Juraev Dilmurod
Abdukarimov Mirzohid
author_facet Evlen Hatice
Ziyamukhamedova Umida
Juraev Dilmurod
Abdukarimov Mirzohid
author_sort Evlen Hatice
collection DOAJ
description Additive manufacturing (AM) is the owner of a huge potential as a manufacturing technology in fabricating functional implants, and scaffolds for biomedical applications. AM, which includes 3D printing (3DP) and 3D bioprinting, can be the solution to produce several needs such as scaffolds/implants, tissue or organs, or medical devices by combining different biomaterials with nanomaterials. Titanium and its alloys and Polylactic acid (PLA) are commonly used in bone tissue repair with their superior bio-functionality. The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has enabled the fabrication of porous titanium and polymer composite scaffolds with controllable microstructures, which is regarded as an effective method for promoting rapid bone repair. An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Elsevier, Embase, and other numerous databases up to December 2021 which are accessed by Karabuk university. To evaluate the possibility of bias and methodological quality, the SYRCLE tool and the last version of the CAMARADES list were used, respectively, a meta-analysis could not be performed. This systematic review is aimed to evaluate the common biomedical potential of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V (Ti64) and PLA matrix scaffold for repairing bone defects to investigate the influential factors that might affect its osteogenic availability. The most ideal parameters for designing the Ti64 scaffold were found to be a pore size of around 300-400 m and porosity of 60-70%, while PLA scaffolds show 350-400 m and nearly the same percentage in porosity as Ti64.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:42:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cd4341b6a7a435cb964d3a10dc44179
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:42:01Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-1cd4341b6a7a435cb964d3a10dc441792023-07-21T09:33:48ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422023-01-014010304010.1051/e3sconf/202340103040e3sconf_conmechydro23_03040Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic reviewEvlen Hatice0Ziyamukhamedova Umida1Juraev Dilmurod2Abdukarimov Mirzohid3Karabuk UniversityTashkent State Transport UniversityKarabuk UniversityTashkent State Technical University Named after Islam KarimovAdditive manufacturing (AM) is the owner of a huge potential as a manufacturing technology in fabricating functional implants, and scaffolds for biomedical applications. AM, which includes 3D printing (3DP) and 3D bioprinting, can be the solution to produce several needs such as scaffolds/implants, tissue or organs, or medical devices by combining different biomaterials with nanomaterials. Titanium and its alloys and Polylactic acid (PLA) are commonly used in bone tissue repair with their superior bio-functionality. The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has enabled the fabrication of porous titanium and polymer composite scaffolds with controllable microstructures, which is regarded as an effective method for promoting rapid bone repair. An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Elsevier, Embase, and other numerous databases up to December 2021 which are accessed by Karabuk university. To evaluate the possibility of bias and methodological quality, the SYRCLE tool and the last version of the CAMARADES list were used, respectively, a meta-analysis could not be performed. This systematic review is aimed to evaluate the common biomedical potential of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V (Ti64) and PLA matrix scaffold for repairing bone defects to investigate the influential factors that might affect its osteogenic availability. The most ideal parameters for designing the Ti64 scaffold were found to be a pore size of around 300-400 m and porosity of 60-70%, while PLA scaffolds show 350-400 m and nearly the same percentage in porosity as Ti64.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/38/e3sconf_conmechydro23_03040.pdf
spellingShingle Evlen Hatice
Ziyamukhamedova Umida
Juraev Dilmurod
Abdukarimov Mirzohid
Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
E3S Web of Conferences
title Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
title_full Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
title_fullStr Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
title_short Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review
title_sort additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on ti6al4v and pla a systematic review
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/38/e3sconf_conmechydro23_03040.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT evlenhatice additivemanufacturingofbionanomaterialsforbiomedicalapplicationsbasedonti6al4vandplaasystematicreview
AT ziyamukhamedovaumida additivemanufacturingofbionanomaterialsforbiomedicalapplicationsbasedonti6al4vandplaasystematicreview
AT juraevdilmurod additivemanufacturingofbionanomaterialsforbiomedicalapplicationsbasedonti6al4vandplaasystematicreview
AT abdukarimovmirzohid additivemanufacturingofbionanomaterialsforbiomedicalapplicationsbasedonti6al4vandplaasystematicreview