Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia

Introduction: Response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia is a main concern. We aimed to compare the effect of Remifentanil and Lidocaine on response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 80...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kambiz Sadegi, Daryoush Rostami, Mania Kaveh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2014-08-01
Series:Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jctm.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3105_093b476a1e65195706dc4c4e2655fdc6.html
_version_ 1818055885819215872
author Kambiz Sadegi
Daryoush Rostami
Mania Kaveh
author_facet Kambiz Sadegi
Daryoush Rostami
Mania Kaveh
author_sort Kambiz Sadegi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia is a main concern. We aimed to compare the effect of Remifentanil and Lidocaine on response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 80 consecutive patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I–II, who underwent general anesthesia for general surgery in Amir-Al-Momenin Hospital on Zabol University of medical sciences from May 2011 to September 2011. Patients received either i.v. lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg (Group L) or 0.5mic/kg/min of Remifentanil (Group R) for emergence from anesthesia. Results: The frequency of cough during emergence from general anesthesia was significantly higher in Group L than in Group R (70.7% vs. 40.3%, P=0.014). Also the grade of cough during the emergence was significantly higher in Group L than in Group R (P=0.013).The difference between two groups regarding sedation level, visual analogue scale (VAS), and pethidine consumption were not significant (P=0.08). Conclusion: we specified Remifentanil reduces cough during the emergence from general anesthesia more effective than Lidocaine in patients undergoing general surgery. In addition, Remifentanil and i.v. lidocaine revealed comparable impact regarding VAS scoring, sedation level and pethidine consumption.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:20:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cd5573be96e4070b14fa0e8a8c1315b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-2447
2322-5750
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:20:04Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1cd5573be96e4070b14fa0e8a8c1315b2022-12-22T01:49:05ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine2345-24472322-57502014-08-01231982023105Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General AnesthesiaKambiz Sadegi0Daryoush Rostami1Mania Kaveh2Anesthesiologist,Department of Anesthesiology, Amir‐Al‐Momenin Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, IranMaster of Science , Department of Anesthesiology, Amir‐Al‐Momenin Hospital ,Faculty of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, IranGynecology and Obstetrics Resident, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IranIntroduction: Response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia is a main concern. We aimed to compare the effect of Remifentanil and Lidocaine on response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 80 consecutive patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I–II, who underwent general anesthesia for general surgery in Amir-Al-Momenin Hospital on Zabol University of medical sciences from May 2011 to September 2011. Patients received either i.v. lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg (Group L) or 0.5mic/kg/min of Remifentanil (Group R) for emergence from anesthesia. Results: The frequency of cough during emergence from general anesthesia was significantly higher in Group L than in Group R (70.7% vs. 40.3%, P=0.014). Also the grade of cough during the emergence was significantly higher in Group L than in Group R (P=0.013).The difference between two groups regarding sedation level, visual analogue scale (VAS), and pethidine consumption were not significant (P=0.08). Conclusion: we specified Remifentanil reduces cough during the emergence from general anesthesia more effective than Lidocaine in patients undergoing general surgery. In addition, Remifentanil and i.v. lidocaine revealed comparable impact regarding VAS scoring, sedation level and pethidine consumption.http://jctm.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3105_093b476a1e65195706dc4c4e2655fdc6.htmlEmergence General AnesthesiaLidocaineRemifentanilTracheal Extubation
spellingShingle Kambiz Sadegi
Daryoush Rostami
Mania Kaveh
Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine
Emergence General Anesthesia
Lidocaine
Remifentanil
Tracheal Extubation
title Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
title_full Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
title_fullStr Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
title_short Remifentanil vs. Lidocaine on Response to Tracheal Tube during Emergence of General Anesthesia
title_sort remifentanil vs lidocaine on response to tracheal tube during emergence of general anesthesia
topic Emergence General Anesthesia
Lidocaine
Remifentanil
Tracheal Extubation
url http://jctm.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3105_093b476a1e65195706dc4c4e2655fdc6.html
work_keys_str_mv AT kambizsadegi remifentanilvslidocaineonresponsetotrachealtubeduringemergenceofgeneralanesthesia
AT daryoushrostami remifentanilvslidocaineonresponsetotrachealtubeduringemergenceofgeneralanesthesia
AT maniakaveh remifentanilvslidocaineonresponsetotrachealtubeduringemergenceofgeneralanesthesia