Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study

Context: Salivary control and maintenance of a dry operating field is a prime requisite of orthodontic bonding. Moisture insensitive primer (MIP) with a clinical significant bond strength values have a better edge over the conventional hydrophobic bonding systems. Aim: The aim of this study is to i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Kumaraswamy Anand, Kaberi Majumder, Sundaram Venkateswaran, N Rengarajan Krishnaswamy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2014;volume=25;issue=2;spage=191;epage=196;aulast=Anand
_version_ 1828415915462492160
author M Kumaraswamy Anand
Kaberi Majumder
Sundaram Venkateswaran
N Rengarajan Krishnaswamy
author_facet M Kumaraswamy Anand
Kaberi Majumder
Sundaram Venkateswaran
N Rengarajan Krishnaswamy
author_sort M Kumaraswamy Anand
collection DOAJ
description Context: Salivary control and maintenance of a dry operating field is a prime requisite of orthodontic bonding. Moisture insensitive primer (MIP) with a clinical significant bond strength values have a better edge over the conventional hydrophobic bonding systems. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of two hydrophilic primers with respect to conventional hydrophobic primer by comparing their shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive-failure locations after contamination with saliva and saliva substitute. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into five group s ; Group A (Transbond MIP/saliva substitute), Group B (Opal Primo/saliva substitute), Group C (Transbond MIP/natural saliva), Group D (Opal Primo/natural saliva), control group - Group E (Transbond XT/dry), adhesive-Transbond XT used for all five groups and bonded using stainless steel brackets. Shear forces were applied to the samples with a universal testing machine. SBSs was measured in megapascals. The mode of bond failure was determined using the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Results: The mean SBS produced by Transbond MIP was higher than Opal Primo, which was statistically significant according to one-way analysis of variance. Both the tested groups showed lesser bond strength values than Transbond XT (the control). ARI scores revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the site of bond failure between study groups. ARI scores were found to be lower for study groups suggesting adhesive failure, compared to higher ARI scores for the control group suggesting cohesive failure. Conclusion: Transbond XT adhesive with Transbond MIP or Opal Primo have clinically acceptable bond strength in wet fields. Opal Primo is a viable option to use as a hydrophilic primer clinically.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:54:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1cd59bbb34834160bd994f79b7800ab4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:54:49Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-1cd59bbb34834160bd994f79b7800ab42022-12-22T01:46:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032014-01-0125219119610.4103/0970-9290.135919Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro studyM Kumaraswamy AnandKaberi MajumderSundaram VenkateswaranN Rengarajan KrishnaswamyContext: Salivary control and maintenance of a dry operating field is a prime requisite of orthodontic bonding. Moisture insensitive primer (MIP) with a clinical significant bond strength values have a better edge over the conventional hydrophobic bonding systems. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of two hydrophilic primers with respect to conventional hydrophobic primer by comparing their shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive-failure locations after contamination with saliva and saliva substitute. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into five group s ; Group A (Transbond MIP/saliva substitute), Group B (Opal Primo/saliva substitute), Group C (Transbond MIP/natural saliva), Group D (Opal Primo/natural saliva), control group - Group E (Transbond XT/dry), adhesive-Transbond XT used for all five groups and bonded using stainless steel brackets. Shear forces were applied to the samples with a universal testing machine. SBSs was measured in megapascals. The mode of bond failure was determined using the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Results: The mean SBS produced by Transbond MIP was higher than Opal Primo, which was statistically significant according to one-way analysis of variance. Both the tested groups showed lesser bond strength values than Transbond XT (the control). ARI scores revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the site of bond failure between study groups. ARI scores were found to be lower for study groups suggesting adhesive failure, compared to higher ARI scores for the control group suggesting cohesive failure. Conclusion: Transbond XT adhesive with Transbond MIP or Opal Primo have clinically acceptable bond strength in wet fields. Opal Primo is a viable option to use as a hydrophilic primer clinically.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2014;volume=25;issue=2;spage=191;epage=196;aulast=AnandAdhesive remnant indexhydrophilic primersmoisture insensitive primersaliva contaminationorthodontic bonding
spellingShingle M Kumaraswamy Anand
Kaberi Majumder
Sundaram Venkateswaran
N Rengarajan Krishnaswamy
Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Adhesive remnant index
hydrophilic primers
moisture insensitive primer
saliva contamination
orthodontic bonding
title Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using two different hydrophilic primers an in vitro study
topic Adhesive remnant index
hydrophilic primers
moisture insensitive primer
saliva contamination
orthodontic bonding
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2014;volume=25;issue=2;spage=191;epage=196;aulast=Anand
work_keys_str_mv AT mkumaraswamyanand comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedusingtwodifferenthydrophilicprimersaninvitrostudy
AT kaberimajumder comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedusingtwodifferenthydrophilicprimersaninvitrostudy
AT sundaramvenkateswaran comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedusingtwodifferenthydrophilicprimersaninvitrostudy
AT nrengarajankrishnaswamy comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedusingtwodifferenthydrophilicprimersaninvitrostudy