Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients
Aim: To compare the effects of cast partial denture with conventional all acrylic denture in respect to retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort and periodontal health of abutments. Methods: 50 adult partially edentulous patient seeking for replacement of missing teeth having Kennedy cl...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2017-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_7841_e8a2e08f2d0f72b2975d7c1f94fdf074.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818135229002416128 |
|---|---|
| author | Pramita Suwal Raj Kumar Singh Ashok Ayer Deepak Kumar Roy Roshan Kumar Roy |
| author_facet | Pramita Suwal Raj Kumar Singh Ashok Ayer Deepak Kumar Roy Roshan Kumar Roy |
| author_sort | Pramita Suwal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: To compare the effects of cast partial denture with conventional all acrylic denture in respect to retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort and periodontal health of abutments. Methods: 50 adult partially edentulous patient seeking for replacement of missing teeth having Kennedy class I and II arches with or without modification areas were selected for the study. Group-A was treated with cast partial denture and Group-B with acrylic partial denture. Data collected during follow-up visit of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by evaluating retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort, periodontal health of abutment. Results: Chi-square test was applied to find out differences between the groups at 95% confidence interval where p = 0.05. One year comparison shows that cast partial denture maintained retention and stability better than acrylic partial denture (p< 0.05). The masticatory efficiency was significantly compromising from 3rd month to 1 year in all acrylic partial denture groups (p< 0.05). The comfort of patient with cast partial denture was maintained better during the observation period (p< 0.05). Periodontal health of abutment was gradually deteriorated in all acrylic denture group (p |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T09:21:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1cdf58c2031c4c0b8aa9cf893e6c78f3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2322-4150 2252-0317 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T09:21:11Z |
| publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
| publisher | Mashhad University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques |
| spelling | doaj.art-1cdf58c2031c4c0b8aa9cf893e6c78f32022-12-22T01:13:15ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Materials and Techniques2322-41502252-03172017-03-0161273410.22038/jdmt.2016.78417841Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous PatientsPramita Suwal0Raj Kumar Singh1Ashok Ayer2Deepak Kumar Roy3Roshan Kumar Roy4Additional Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, NepalProfessor, Department of Prosthodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, NepalPostgraduate resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.Lecturer, Department of Community Medicine, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepalgunj, Nepal.Aim: To compare the effects of cast partial denture with conventional all acrylic denture in respect to retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort and periodontal health of abutments. Methods: 50 adult partially edentulous patient seeking for replacement of missing teeth having Kennedy class I and II arches with or without modification areas were selected for the study. Group-A was treated with cast partial denture and Group-B with acrylic partial denture. Data collected during follow-up visit of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by evaluating retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort, periodontal health of abutment. Results: Chi-square test was applied to find out differences between the groups at 95% confidence interval where p = 0.05. One year comparison shows that cast partial denture maintained retention and stability better than acrylic partial denture (p< 0.05). The masticatory efficiency was significantly compromising from 3rd month to 1 year in all acrylic partial denture groups (p< 0.05). The comfort of patient with cast partial denture was maintained better during the observation period (p< 0.05). Periodontal health of abutment was gradually deteriorated in all acrylic denture group (phttp://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_7841_e8a2e08f2d0f72b2975d7c1f94fdf074.pdfDental prosthesis retentionDenture baseMasticatory efficiencyperiodontal health of abutmentRemovable partial denture |
| spellingShingle | Pramita Suwal Raj Kumar Singh Ashok Ayer Deepak Kumar Roy Roshan Kumar Roy Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques Dental prosthesis retention Denture base Masticatory efficiency periodontal health of abutment Removable partial denture |
| title | Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients |
| title_full | Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients |
| title_fullStr | Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients |
| title_short | Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients |
| title_sort | cast partial denture versus acrylic partial denture for replacement of missing teeth in partially edentulous patients |
| topic | Dental prosthesis retention Denture base Masticatory efficiency periodontal health of abutment Removable partial denture |
| url | http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_7841_e8a2e08f2d0f72b2975d7c1f94fdf074.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pramitasuwal castpartialdentureversusacrylicpartialdentureforreplacementofmissingteethinpartiallyedentulouspatients AT rajkumarsingh castpartialdentureversusacrylicpartialdentureforreplacementofmissingteethinpartiallyedentulouspatients AT ashokayer castpartialdentureversusacrylicpartialdentureforreplacementofmissingteethinpartiallyedentulouspatients AT deepakkumarroy castpartialdentureversusacrylicpartialdentureforreplacementofmissingteethinpartiallyedentulouspatients AT roshankumarroy castpartialdentureversusacrylicpartialdentureforreplacementofmissingteethinpartiallyedentulouspatients |