The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins

<p>To study the global hydrological cycle and its response to a changing climate, we rely on global climate models (GCMs) and global hydrological models (GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Benedict, C. C. van Heerwaarden, A. H. Weerts, W. Hazeleger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-04-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/1779/2019/hess-23-1779-2019.pdf
_version_ 1818303552888504320
author I. Benedict
C. C. van Heerwaarden
A. H. Weerts
A. H. Weerts
W. Hazeleger
W. Hazeleger
author_facet I. Benedict
C. C. van Heerwaarden
A. H. Weerts
A. H. Weerts
W. Hazeleger
W. Hazeleger
author_sort I. Benedict
collection DOAJ
description <p>To study the global hydrological cycle and its response to a changing climate, we rely on global climate models (GCMs) and global hydrological models (GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detail that can be resolved. Increase in computer power therefore permits increase in resolution, but it is an open question where this resolution is invested best: in the GCM or GHM. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of increased resolution, without modifying the representation of physical processes in the models. By doing so, we can evaluate the benefits of resolution alone. We assess and compare the benefits of an increased resolution for a GCM and a GHM for two basins with long observational records: the Rhine and Mississippi basins. Increasing the resolution of a GCM (1.125 to 0.25<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>) results in an improved precipitation budget over the Rhine basin, attributed to a more realistic large-scale circulation. These improvements with increased resolution are not found for the Mississippi basin, possibly because precipitation is strongly dependent on the representation of still unresolved convective processes. Increasing the resolution of the GCM improved the simulations of the monthly-averaged discharge for the Rhine, but did not improve the representation of extreme streamflow events. For the Mississippi basin, no substantial differences in precipitation and discharge were found with the higher-resolution GCM and GHM. Increasing the resolution of parameters describing vegetation and orography in the high-resolution GHM (from 0.5 to 0.05<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>) shows no significant differences in discharge for both basins. A straightforward resolution increase in the GHM is thus most likely not the best method to improve discharge predictions, which emphasizes the need for better representation of processes and improved parameterizations that go hand in hand with resolution increase in a GHM.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:56:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1ce084a5a20a4aef96eb8ef15f512947
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:56:37Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1ce084a5a20a4aef96eb8ef15f5129472022-12-21T23:57:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382019-04-01231779180010.5194/hess-23-1779-2019The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basinsI. Benedict0C. C. van Heerwaarden1A. H. Weerts2A. H. Weerts3W. Hazeleger4W. Hazeleger5Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 BP Wageningen, the NetherlandsMeteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 BP Wageningen, the NetherlandsHydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 BP Wageningen, the NetherlandsDeltares, P.O. Box 177, 2600 MH Delft, the NetherlandsMeteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 BP Wageningen, the NetherlandsNetherlands eScience Center (NLeSC), Science Park 140, 1098 XG Amsterdam, the Netherlands<p>To study the global hydrological cycle and its response to a changing climate, we rely on global climate models (GCMs) and global hydrological models (GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detail that can be resolved. Increase in computer power therefore permits increase in resolution, but it is an open question where this resolution is invested best: in the GCM or GHM. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of increased resolution, without modifying the representation of physical processes in the models. By doing so, we can evaluate the benefits of resolution alone. We assess and compare the benefits of an increased resolution for a GCM and a GHM for two basins with long observational records: the Rhine and Mississippi basins. Increasing the resolution of a GCM (1.125 to 0.25<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>) results in an improved precipitation budget over the Rhine basin, attributed to a more realistic large-scale circulation. These improvements with increased resolution are not found for the Mississippi basin, possibly because precipitation is strongly dependent on the representation of still unresolved convective processes. Increasing the resolution of the GCM improved the simulations of the monthly-averaged discharge for the Rhine, but did not improve the representation of extreme streamflow events. For the Mississippi basin, no substantial differences in precipitation and discharge were found with the higher-resolution GCM and GHM. Increasing the resolution of parameters describing vegetation and orography in the high-resolution GHM (from 0.5 to 0.05<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>) shows no significant differences in discharge for both basins. A straightforward resolution increase in the GHM is thus most likely not the best method to improve discharge predictions, which emphasizes the need for better representation of processes and improved parameterizations that go hand in hand with resolution increase in a GHM.</p>https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/1779/2019/hess-23-1779-2019.pdf
spellingShingle I. Benedict
C. C. van Heerwaarden
A. H. Weerts
A. H. Weerts
W. Hazeleger
W. Hazeleger
The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
title_full The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
title_fullStr The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
title_full_unstemmed The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
title_short The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
title_sort benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the rhine and mississippi basins
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/1779/2019/hess-23-1779-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ibenedict thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ccvanheerwaarden thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ahweerts thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ahweerts thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT whazeleger thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT whazeleger thebenefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ibenedict benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ccvanheerwaarden benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ahweerts benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT ahweerts benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT whazeleger benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins
AT whazeleger benefitsofspatialresolutionincreaseinglobalsimulationsofthehydrologicalcycleevaluatedfortherhineandmississippibasins