Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain
Abstract Background Movement dysfunctions have been associated with persistent low back pain (LBP) but optimal treatment remains unclear. One possibility is that subgroups of persistent LBP patients have differing movement characteristics and therefore different responses to interventions. This stud...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2233-1 |
_version_ | 1819150557010460672 |
---|---|
author | Robert A. Laird Jennifer L. Keating Peter Kent |
author_facet | Robert A. Laird Jennifer L. Keating Peter Kent |
author_sort | Robert A. Laird |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Movement dysfunctions have been associated with persistent low back pain (LBP) but optimal treatment remains unclear. One possibility is that subgroups of persistent LBP patients have differing movement characteristics and therefore different responses to interventions. This study examined if there were patterns of flexion-related lumbo-pelvic kinematic and EMG parameters that might define subgroups of movement. Methods This was a cross-sectional, observational study of 126 people without any history of significant LBP and 140 people with persistent LBP (n = 266). Wireless motion and surface EMG sensors collected lumbo-pelvic data on flexion parameters (range of motion (ROM) of trunk, lumbar, and pelvis), speed, sequence coordination and timing, and EMG extensor muscle activity in forward bending (flexion relaxation)), and sitting parameters (relative position, pelvic tilt range and tilt ratio). Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns in these parameters. Results Four subgroups with high probabilities of membership were found (mean 94.9%, SD10.1%). Subgroup 1 (n = 133 people, 26% LBP) had the greatest range of trunk flexion, fastest movement, full flexion relaxation, and synchronous lumbar versus pelvic movement. Subgroup 2 (n = 73, 71% LBP) had the greatest lumbar ROM, less flexion relaxation, and a 0.9 s lag of pelvic movement. Subgroup 3 (n = 41, 83% LBP) had the smallest lumbar ROM, a 0.6 s delay of lumbar movement (compared to pelvic movement), and less flexion relaxation than subgroup 2. Subgroup 4 (n = 19 people, 100% LBP) had the least flexion relaxation, slowest movement, greatest delay of pelvic movement and the smallest pelvic ROM. These patterns could be described as standard (subgroup 1), lumbar dominant (subgroup 2), pelvic dominant (subgroup 3) and guarded (subgroup 4). Significant post-hoc differences were seen between subgroups for most lumbo-pelvic kinematic and EMG parameters. There was greater direction-specific pain and activity limitation scores for subgroup 4 compared to other groups, and a greater percentage of people with leg pain in subgroups 2 and 4. Conclusion Four subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics were revealed with an unequal distribution among people with and without a history of persistent LBP. Such subgroups may have implications for which patients are likely to respond to movement-based interventions. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T14:19:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1cff6a951e6c444f8f68571098a4458c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2474 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T14:19:23Z |
publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
spelling | doaj.art-1cff6a951e6c444f8f68571098a4458c2022-12-21T18:23:02ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742018-08-0119111310.1186/s12891-018-2233-1Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back painRobert A. Laird0Jennifer L. Keating1Peter Kent2Department of Physiotherapy, Monash UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Monash UniversitySchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin UniversityAbstract Background Movement dysfunctions have been associated with persistent low back pain (LBP) but optimal treatment remains unclear. One possibility is that subgroups of persistent LBP patients have differing movement characteristics and therefore different responses to interventions. This study examined if there were patterns of flexion-related lumbo-pelvic kinematic and EMG parameters that might define subgroups of movement. Methods This was a cross-sectional, observational study of 126 people without any history of significant LBP and 140 people with persistent LBP (n = 266). Wireless motion and surface EMG sensors collected lumbo-pelvic data on flexion parameters (range of motion (ROM) of trunk, lumbar, and pelvis), speed, sequence coordination and timing, and EMG extensor muscle activity in forward bending (flexion relaxation)), and sitting parameters (relative position, pelvic tilt range and tilt ratio). Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns in these parameters. Results Four subgroups with high probabilities of membership were found (mean 94.9%, SD10.1%). Subgroup 1 (n = 133 people, 26% LBP) had the greatest range of trunk flexion, fastest movement, full flexion relaxation, and synchronous lumbar versus pelvic movement. Subgroup 2 (n = 73, 71% LBP) had the greatest lumbar ROM, less flexion relaxation, and a 0.9 s lag of pelvic movement. Subgroup 3 (n = 41, 83% LBP) had the smallest lumbar ROM, a 0.6 s delay of lumbar movement (compared to pelvic movement), and less flexion relaxation than subgroup 2. Subgroup 4 (n = 19 people, 100% LBP) had the least flexion relaxation, slowest movement, greatest delay of pelvic movement and the smallest pelvic ROM. These patterns could be described as standard (subgroup 1), lumbar dominant (subgroup 2), pelvic dominant (subgroup 3) and guarded (subgroup 4). Significant post-hoc differences were seen between subgroups for most lumbo-pelvic kinematic and EMG parameters. There was greater direction-specific pain and activity limitation scores for subgroup 4 compared to other groups, and a greater percentage of people with leg pain in subgroups 2 and 4. Conclusion Four subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics were revealed with an unequal distribution among people with and without a history of persistent LBP. Such subgroups may have implications for which patients are likely to respond to movement-based interventions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2233-1Low back painSubgroupsPatternsMovement disordersRange of movement (ROM)Flexion relaxation |
spellingShingle | Robert A. Laird Jennifer L. Keating Peter Kent Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Low back pain Subgroups Patterns Movement disorders Range of movement (ROM) Flexion relaxation |
title | Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
title_full | Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
title_fullStr | Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
title_short | Subgroups of lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
title_sort | subgroups of lumbo pelvic flexion kinematics are present in people with and without persistent low back pain |
topic | Low back pain Subgroups Patterns Movement disorders Range of movement (ROM) Flexion relaxation |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2233-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertalaird subgroupsoflumbopelvicflexionkinematicsarepresentinpeoplewithandwithoutpersistentlowbackpain AT jenniferlkeating subgroupsoflumbopelvicflexionkinematicsarepresentinpeoplewithandwithoutpersistentlowbackpain AT peterkent subgroupsoflumbopelvicflexionkinematicsarepresentinpeoplewithandwithoutpersistentlowbackpain |