Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies

A long standing hypothesis in the neuroscience community is that the CNS generates the muscle activities to accomplish movements by combining a relatively small number of stereotyped patterns of muscle activations, often referred to as muscle synergies. Different definitions of synergies have been g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enrico eChiovetto, Bastien eBerret, Ioannis eDelis, Stefano ePanzeri, Thierry ePozzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00011/full
_version_ 1811204551149092864
author Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Bastien eBerret
Bastien eBerret
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Stefano ePanzeri
Stefano ePanzeri
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
author_facet Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Bastien eBerret
Bastien eBerret
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Stefano ePanzeri
Stefano ePanzeri
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
author_sort Enrico eChiovetto
collection DOAJ
description A long standing hypothesis in the neuroscience community is that the CNS generates the muscle activities to accomplish movements by combining a relatively small number of stereotyped patterns of muscle activations, often referred to as muscle synergies. Different definitions of synergies have been given in the literature. The most well-known are those of synchronous, time-varying and temporal muscle synergies. Each one of them is based on a different mathematical model used to factor some EMG array recordings collected during the execution of variety of motor tasks into a well-determined spatial, temporal or spatio-temporal organization. This plurality of definitions and their separate application to complex tasks have so far complicated the comparison and interpretation of the results obtained across studies, and it has always remained unclear why and when one synergistic decomposition should be preferred to another one. By using well-understood motor tasks such as elbow flexions and extensions, we aimed in this study to clarify better what are the motor features characterized by each kind of decomposition and to assess whether, when and why one of them should be preferred to the others. We found that three temporal synergies, each one of them accounting for specific temporal phases of the movements could account for the majority of the data variation. Similar performances could be achieved by two synchronous synergies, encoding the agonist-antagonist nature of the two muscles considered, and by two time-varying muscle synergies, encoding each one a task-related feature of the elbow movements, specifically their direction. Our findings support the notion that each EMG decomposition provides a set of well-interpretable muscle synergies, identifying reduction of dimensionality in different aspects of the movements. Taken together, our findings suggest that all decompositions are not equivalent and may imply different neurophysiological substrates to be implemented.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:16:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d00e137178f419f8a96c059a4892ec5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5188
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:16:12Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-1d00e137178f419f8a96c059a4892ec52022-12-22T03:50:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882013-02-01710.3389/fncom.2013.0001140686Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergiesEnrico eChiovetto0Enrico eChiovetto1Enrico eChiovetto2Enrico eChiovetto3Bastien eBerret4Bastien eBerret5Ioannis eDelis6Ioannis eDelis7Ioannis eDelis8Stefano ePanzeri9Stefano ePanzeri10Thierry ePozzo11Thierry ePozzo12Thierry ePozzo13Hertie Institute of Clinical Brain ResearchUniversity of TuebingenUniversity Clinic TuebingenIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversité Paris-Sud 11Istituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversity of GenoaUniversity of GlasgowIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversity of GlasgowIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversité de BourgogneINSERMA long standing hypothesis in the neuroscience community is that the CNS generates the muscle activities to accomplish movements by combining a relatively small number of stereotyped patterns of muscle activations, often referred to as muscle synergies. Different definitions of synergies have been given in the literature. The most well-known are those of synchronous, time-varying and temporal muscle synergies. Each one of them is based on a different mathematical model used to factor some EMG array recordings collected during the execution of variety of motor tasks into a well-determined spatial, temporal or spatio-temporal organization. This plurality of definitions and their separate application to complex tasks have so far complicated the comparison and interpretation of the results obtained across studies, and it has always remained unclear why and when one synergistic decomposition should be preferred to another one. By using well-understood motor tasks such as elbow flexions and extensions, we aimed in this study to clarify better what are the motor features characterized by each kind of decomposition and to assess whether, when and why one of them should be preferred to the others. We found that three temporal synergies, each one of them accounting for specific temporal phases of the movements could account for the majority of the data variation. Similar performances could be achieved by two synchronous synergies, encoding the agonist-antagonist nature of the two muscles considered, and by two time-varying muscle synergies, encoding each one a task-related feature of the elbow movements, specifically their direction. Our findings support the notion that each EMG decomposition provides a set of well-interpretable muscle synergies, identifying reduction of dimensionality in different aspects of the movements. Taken together, our findings suggest that all decompositions are not equivalent and may imply different neurophysiological substrates to be implemented.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00011/fullEMGdimensionality reductionnon-negative matrix factorizationmuscle synergiesElbow RotationsTriphasic Pattern
spellingShingle Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Enrico eChiovetto
Bastien eBerret
Bastien eBerret
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Ioannis eDelis
Stefano ePanzeri
Stefano ePanzeri
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
Thierry ePozzo
Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
EMG
dimensionality reduction
non-negative matrix factorization
muscle synergies
Elbow Rotations
Triphasic Pattern
title Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
title_full Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
title_fullStr Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
title_full_unstemmed Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
title_short Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies
title_sort investigating reduction of dimensionality during single joint elbow movements a case study on muscle synergies
topic EMG
dimensionality reduction
non-negative matrix factorization
muscle synergies
Elbow Rotations
Triphasic Pattern
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00011/full
work_keys_str_mv AT enricoechiovetto investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT enricoechiovetto investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT enricoechiovetto investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT enricoechiovetto investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT bastieneberret investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT bastieneberret investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT ioannisedelis investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT ioannisedelis investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT ioannisedelis investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT stefanoepanzeri investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT stefanoepanzeri investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT thierryepozzo investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT thierryepozzo investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies
AT thierryepozzo investigatingreductionofdimensionalityduringsinglejointelbowmovementsacasestudyonmusclesynergies