Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach

The division of an arable field into zones of different productivity requires a reliable, discriminatory tool. This hypothesis was validated by analyzing the spatial variability of yield and N indicators in the crop rotation of winter oilseed rape (WOSR)/winter triticale (WTR) during 2016/2017 and 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Remigiusz Łukowiak, Witold Grzebisz, Jakub Ceglarek, Adam Podolski, Cezary Kaźmierowski, Jan Piekarczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/12/1959
_version_ 1827700168944779264
author Remigiusz Łukowiak
Witold Grzebisz
Jakub Ceglarek
Adam Podolski
Cezary Kaźmierowski
Jan Piekarczyk
author_facet Remigiusz Łukowiak
Witold Grzebisz
Jakub Ceglarek
Adam Podolski
Cezary Kaźmierowski
Jan Piekarczyk
author_sort Remigiusz Łukowiak
collection DOAJ
description The division of an arable field into zones of different productivity requires a reliable, discriminatory tool. This hypothesis was validated by analyzing the spatial variability of yield and N indicators in the crop rotation of winter oilseed rape (WOSR)/winter triticale (WTR) during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 in a field of 30 ha (Przebędowo, Poland). The direct, measurable variables were: yield, N accumulated in—seeds/grain and crop residues, mineral N in spring, and harvest. The basic N indicators were total N uptake (TN), N-partial factor productivity, and N balance (N<sub>b</sub>). The attainable yields of WOSR and WTR were 4.93 and 6.51 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, and a yield gap of −2.04 and −2.10 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The management of 50 kg of the non-used N by crops, i.e. nitrogen gap (NG) could cover 36% and 65% of the yield gap (YG), respectively. The N<sub>b</sub>, based on N input (N<sub>in</sub> = N<sub>min</sub> + N<sub>f</sub>) and TN, was the key field indicator, defining both yield and NG. Geostatic parameters, i.e., the nugget to sill ratio, spatial dependence range, and mean correlation distance, were very stable (≤0.2–0.17; 94–100 m; 28 m for WOSR and WTR). The spatial stability of N<sub>b</sub>, irrespective of the crop and growing conditions, corroborates its suitability for discriminating high and low-productivity field zones.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:06:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d0a3b8ee5d64dfe8c0341abfc2900de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:06:36Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-1d0a3b8ee5d64dfe8c0341abfc2900de2023-11-21T00:34:34ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952020-12-011012195910.3390/agronomy10121959Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation ApproachRemigiusz Łukowiak0Witold Grzebisz1Jakub Ceglarek2Adam Podolski3Cezary Kaźmierowski4Jan Piekarczyk5Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, PolandEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Soil Science Research Unit, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, PolandEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Soil Science Research Unit, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680 Poznan, PolandEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Soil Science Research Unit, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680 Poznan, PolandThe division of an arable field into zones of different productivity requires a reliable, discriminatory tool. This hypothesis was validated by analyzing the spatial variability of yield and N indicators in the crop rotation of winter oilseed rape (WOSR)/winter triticale (WTR) during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 in a field of 30 ha (Przebędowo, Poland). The direct, measurable variables were: yield, N accumulated in—seeds/grain and crop residues, mineral N in spring, and harvest. The basic N indicators were total N uptake (TN), N-partial factor productivity, and N balance (N<sub>b</sub>). The attainable yields of WOSR and WTR were 4.93 and 6.51 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, and a yield gap of −2.04 and −2.10 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The management of 50 kg of the non-used N by crops, i.e. nitrogen gap (NG) could cover 36% and 65% of the yield gap (YG), respectively. The N<sub>b</sub>, based on N input (N<sub>in</sub> = N<sub>min</sub> + N<sub>f</sub>) and TN, was the key field indicator, defining both yield and NG. Geostatic parameters, i.e., the nugget to sill ratio, spatial dependence range, and mean correlation distance, were very stable (≤0.2–0.17; 94–100 m; 28 m for WOSR and WTR). The spatial stability of N<sub>b</sub>, irrespective of the crop and growing conditions, corroborates its suitability for discriminating high and low-productivity field zones.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/12/1959winter oilseed rape → winter triticale cropping sequencemineral NN inputN total uptakeN balanceN gap
spellingShingle Remigiusz Łukowiak
Witold Grzebisz
Jakub Ceglarek
Adam Podolski
Cezary Kaźmierowski
Jan Piekarczyk
Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
Agronomy
winter oilseed rape → winter triticale cropping sequence
mineral N
N input
N total uptake
N balance
N gap
title Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
title_full Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
title_fullStr Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
title_short Spatial Variability of Yield and Nitrogen Indicators—A Crop Rotation Approach
title_sort spatial variability of yield and nitrogen indicators a crop rotation approach
topic winter oilseed rape → winter triticale cropping sequence
mineral N
N input
N total uptake
N balance
N gap
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/12/1959
work_keys_str_mv AT remigiuszłukowiak spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach
AT witoldgrzebisz spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach
AT jakubceglarek spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach
AT adampodolski spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach
AT cezarykazmierowski spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach
AT janpiekarczyk spatialvariabilityofyieldandnitrogenindicatorsacroprotationapproach