Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience

Genuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mika Rubinov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2023-11-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/79559
_version_ 1797242527649103872
author Mika Rubinov
author_facet Mika Rubinov
author_sort Mika Rubinov
collection DOAJ
description Genuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I discuss that this problem can confound key results and estimate that it has affected more than three thousand studies in network neuroscience over the last decade. I suggest that future studies can reduce this problem by limiting the use of speculative evidence, integrating existing knowledge into benchmark models, and rigorously testing proposed discoveries against these models. I conclude with a summary of practical challenges and recommendations.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:44:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d14d1dcef134a46ae9d3e85af3404f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:40:38Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-1d14d1dcef134a46ae9d3e85af3404f42024-03-27T12:57:54ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2023-11-011210.7554/eLife.79559Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscienceMika Rubinov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-7075Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Computer Science, and Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States; Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United StatesGenuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I discuss that this problem can confound key results and estimate that it has affected more than three thousand studies in network neuroscience over the last decade. I suggest that future studies can reduce this problem by limiting the use of speculative evidence, integrating existing knowledge into benchmark models, and rigorously testing proposed discoveries against these models. I conclude with a summary of practical challenges and recommendations.https://elifesciences.org/articles/79559network neurosciencesystems neurosciencecomputational neurosciencestatistical modelsexplanatory modelsbenchmark models
spellingShingle Mika Rubinov
Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
eLife
network neuroscience
systems neuroscience
computational neuroscience
statistical models
explanatory models
benchmark models
title Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
title_full Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
title_fullStr Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
title_short Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
title_sort circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience
topic network neuroscience
systems neuroscience
computational neuroscience
statistical models
explanatory models
benchmark models
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/79559
work_keys_str_mv AT mikarubinov circularandunifiedanalysisinnetworkneuroscience